IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v56y2022i2d10.1007_s11135-021-01142-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fuzzy set based intra-urban inequality indicator

Author

Listed:
  • Matheus Pereira Libório

    (Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais)

  • Petr Yakovlevitch Ekel

    (Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais
    Federal University of Minas Gerais)

  • Oseias da Silva Martinuci

    (State University of Maringá)

  • Letícia Ribeiro Figueiredo

    (Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais)

  • Renato Moreira Hadad

    (Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais)

  • Renata de Mello Lyrio

    (Federal University of Minas Gerais)

  • Patrícia Bernardes

    (Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais)

Abstract

Intra-urban inequality is not strictly defined and therefore cannot be measured accurately. The literature shows that the measurement of inequality varies depending on the judgment of the experts and that this judgment can be realized in several ways. Taking this into account, the capabilities created using fuzzy set theory and consensus schemes can be useful in the process of measuring inequality. The objective of their use is twofold. First, analyze the degree to which experts diverge on an ill-defined phenomenon such as inequality. Second, build a fuzzy set based Intra-Urban Inequality Indicator (F-II-I). The results of the present research show that F-II-I is adequate to represent the intra-urban inequality. The experts involved agree 93% on the weight of the inequality variables. The correlation coefficient and the proportion of outliers between the F-II-I and the Average Monthly Income per Household is 0.61 and 0.06, respectively. The degree of uncertainty associated with the different ways of normalizing and aggregating the F-II-I variables was 0.11. The pattern of inequality represented by F-II-I is consistent with similar studies and with the World Bank's Poverty Line. This research contributes to the practice as it combines methods and techniques that make it possible to measure phenomena without strict definition and to consider conflicting opinions expressed in different ways. As a theoretical contribution, this research demonstrates a certain degree of a satisfactory definition of intra-urban inequality. Besides, even if this definition's limits remain unclear, there is a reasonable consensus degree on specific aspects of inequality.

Suggested Citation

  • Matheus Pereira Libório & Petr Yakovlevitch Ekel & Oseias da Silva Martinuci & Letícia Ribeiro Figueiredo & Renato Moreira Hadad & Renata de Mello Lyrio & Patrícia Bernardes, 2022. "Fuzzy set based intra-urban inequality indicator," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 667-687, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:56:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-021-01142-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-021-01142-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-021-01142-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-021-01142-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gianni Betti & Francesca Gagliardi & Vijay Verma, 2018. "Simplified Jackknife Variance Estimates for Fuzzy Measures of Multidimensional Poverty," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 86(1), pages 68-86, April.
    2. Jolliffe, Dean & Prydz, Espen Beer, 2015. "Global Poverty Goals and Prices: How Purchasing Power Parity Matters," IZA Discussion Papers 9064, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Michela Nardo & Michaela Saisana & Andrea Saltelli & Stefano Tarantola & Anders Hoffman & Enrico Giovannini, 2005. "Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide," OECD Statistics Working Papers 2005/3, OECD Publishing.
    4. Matheus Pereira Libório & Oseias da Silva Martinuci & Sandro Laudares & Renata de Mello Lyrio & Alexei Manso Correa Machado & Patrícia Bernardes & Petr Ekel, 2020. "Measuring Intra-Urban Inequality with Structural Equation Modeling: A Theory-Grounded Indicator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Francisco H. G. Ferreira & Shaohua Chen & Andrew Dabalen & Yuri Dikhanov & Nada Hamadeh & Dean Jolliffe & Ambar Narayan & Espen Beer Prydz & Ana Revenga & Prem Sangraula & Umar Serajuddin & Nobuo Yosh, 2016. "A global count of the extreme poor in 2012: data issues, methodology and initial results," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 14(2), pages 141-172, June.
    6. Mauricio Gallardo, 2020. "Measuring Vulnerability to Multidimensional Poverty," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 67-103, February.
    7. James Foster & Joel Greer & Erik Thorbecke, 2010. "The Foster–Greer–Thorbecke (FGT) poverty measures: 25 years later," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 8(4), pages 491-524, December.
    8. James E. Foster & Joel Greer & Erik Thorbecke, 2010. "The Foster-Greer-Thorbecke (FGT) Poverty Measures: Twenty-Five Years Later," Working Papers 2010-14, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    9. Syrovátka, Miroslav & Schlossarek, Martin, 2019. "Measuring development with inequality: How (should) aggregate indicators of development account for inequality?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Dean Jolliffe & Espen Beer Prydz, 2016. "Estimating international poverty lines from comparable national thresholds," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 14(2), pages 185-198, June.
    11. Gordon Anderson & Maria Pittau & Roberto Zelli, 2014. "Poverty status probability: a new approach to measuring poverty and the progress of the poor," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 12(4), pages 469-488, December.
    12. Herrera-Viedma, E. & Herrera, F. & Chiclana, F. & Luque, M., 2004. "Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(1), pages 98-109, April.
    13. Salvatore Greco & Alessio Ishizaka & Menelaos Tasiou & Gianpiero Torrisi, 2019. "On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 61-94, January.
    14. Martin Schlossarek & Miroslav Syrovátka & Ondřej Vencálek, 2019. "The Importance of Variables in Composite Indices: A Contribution to the Methodology and Application to Development Indices," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 145(3), pages 1125-1160, October.
    15. Samira El Gibari & Trinidad Gómez & Francisco Ruiz, 2019. "Building composite indicators using multicriteria methods: a review," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(1), pages 1-24, February.
    16. Margherita Casini & Simone Bastianoni & Francesca Gagliardi & Massimo Gigliotti & Angelo Riccaboni & Gianni Betti, 2019. "Sustainable Development Goals Indicators: A Methodological Proposal for a Multidimensional Fuzzy Index in the Mediterranean Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexei Manso Correa Machado & Petr Iakovlevitch Ekel & Matheus Pereira Libório, 2023. "Goal-based participatory weighting scheme: balancing objectivity and subjectivity in the construction of composite indicators," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 4387-4407, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manzoor Hussain Memon, 2023. "Poverty, Gap and Severity Estimates for Disaster Prone Rural Areas of Pakistan," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 645-663, April.
    2. Matheus Pereira Libório & Oseias da Silva Martinuci & Alexei Manso Correa Machado & Renata de Mello Lyrio & Patrícia Bernardes, 2022. "Time–Space Analysis of Multidimensional Phenomena: A Composite Indicator of Social Exclusion Through k-Means," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 159(2), pages 569-591, January.
    3. Ilaria Benedetti & Federico Crescenzi & Tiziana Laureti, 2020. "Measuring Uncertainty for Poverty Indicators at Regional Level: The Case of Mediterranean Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Alexei Manso Correa Machado & Petr Iakovlevitch Ekel & Matheus Pereira Libório, 2023. "Goal-based participatory weighting scheme: balancing objectivity and subjectivity in the construction of composite indicators," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 4387-4407, October.
    5. Olga Bogdanov & Veljko Jeremiæ & Sandra Jednak & Mladen Èudanov, 2019. "Scrutinizing the Smart City Index: a multivariate statistical approach," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 37(2), pages 777-799.
    6. Clarke, Philip & Erreygers, Guido, 2020. "Defining and measuring health poverty," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    7. Mariateresa Ciommi & Chiara Gigliarano & Francesco M. Chelli & Mauro Gallegati, 2022. "It is the Total that Does [Not] Make the Sum: Nature, Economy and Society in the Equitable and Sustainable Well-Being of the Italian Provinces," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 491-522, June.
    8. Tomáš Želinský & Martina Mysíková & Thesia I. Garner, 2022. "Trends in Subjective Income Poverty Rates in the European Union," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(5), pages 2493-2516, October.
    9. Leonardo Lucchetti & Andrés Castañeda & Santiago Garriga & Leonardo Gasparini & Daniel Valderrama, 2018. "How Sensitive Is Regional Poverty Measurement in Latin America to the Value of the Poverty Line?," Economía Journal, The Latin American and Caribbean Economic Association - LACEA, vol. 0(Fall 2018), pages 33-58, November.
    10. Haqiqi, Iman & Yasharel, Sepideh, 2018. "Removing Fossil Fuel Subsidies to Help the Poor," MPRA Paper 95907, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Ravi Kanbur & Tuuli Paukkeri & Jukka Pirttilä & Matti Tuomala, 2018. "Optimal taxation and public provision for poverty reduction," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 25(1), pages 64-98, February.
    12. Ye, Yuxiang & Koch, Steven F., 2021. "Measuring energy poverty in South Africa based on household required energy consumption," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    13. Dean Jolliffe & Espen Beer Prydz, 2016. "Estimating international poverty lines from comparable national thresholds," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 14(2), pages 185-198, June.
    14. Ewa Roszkowska & Bartłomiej Jefmański, 2021. "Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Synthetic Measure (I-VIFSM) Based on Hellwig’s Approach in the Analysis of Survey Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, January.
    15. Hisatoshi Hoken & Hiroshi Sato, 2022. "Effects of Public Transfers on Income Inequality and Poverty in Rural China," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 30(5), pages 29-48, September.
    16. Decerf, Benoit & Ferreira, Francisco H.G. & Mahler, Daniel G. & Sterck, Olivier, 2021. "Lives and livelihoods: Estimates of the global mortality and poverty effects of the Covid-19 pandemic," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    17. Espinoza-Delgado, José & Klasen, Stephan, 2018. "Gender and multidimensional poverty in Nicaragua: An individual based approach," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 466-491.
    18. García-Pérez, Carmelo & Prieto-Alaiz, Mercedes & Simón, Hipólito, 2020. "Multidimensional measurement of precarious employment using hedonic weights: Evidence from Spain," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 348-359.
    19. Romanus Osabohien & Alexander Nimo Wiredu & Paul Matin Dontsop Nguezet & Djana Babatima Mignouna & Tahirou Abdoulaye & Victor Manyong & Zoumana Bamba & Bola Amoke Awotide, 2021. "Youth Participation in Agriculture and Poverty Reduction in Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    20. Ali Enami & Ugo Gentilini & Patricio Larroulet & Nora Lustig & Emma Monsalve & Siyu Quan & Jamele Rigolini, 2023. "Universal Basic Income Programs: How Much Would Taxes Need to Rise? Evidence for Brazil, Chile, India, Russia, and South Africa," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(9), pages 1443-1463, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:56:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11135-021-01142-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.