IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v250y2016i3p816-826.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selective majority additive ordered weighting averaging operatorAuthor-Name: Karanik, Marcelo

Author

Listed:
  • Peláez, José Ignacio
  • Bernal, Rubén

Abstract

Usually, in order to summarize various opinions about a particular situation (mainly product or service valuation on Internet) a process called aggregation is used. This process basically consists of determining the appropriate value to represent the majority's opinion and many strategies and operators can be used for this purpose. Simple arithmetic mean is widely used to resume several opinions in a single value, but this value is generally not representative or it is affected by the extreme values. An alternative to aggregate opinions are the Ordered Weighting Averaging (OWA) operators. Nevertheless, they have distribution problems when applied to aggregates with cardinalities. These problems may be solved by using Majority Additive OWA (MA-OWA) operator, a sort of arithmetic mean of arithmetic means. MA-OWA operator works adequately but, in some cases, discards the minority's opinion, specifically when it does not coincide with the largest cardinality value. In order to generalize the usage of MA-OWA operator, the rest of opinions are taken into account using a Cardinality Relevance Factor. This paper introduces a Selective Majority Additive OWA (SMA-OWA) which manages the significance of all opinions varying the Cardinality Relevance Factor. Mathematical extension of SMA-OWA, its properties and some illustrative examples are presented in this article.

Suggested Citation

  • Peláez, José Ignacio & Bernal, Rubén, 2016. "Selective majority additive ordered weighting averaging operatorAuthor-Name: Karanik, Marcelo," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(3), pages 816-826.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:250:y:2016:i:3:p:816-826
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.10.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221715009182
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.10.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bustince, H. & Jurio, A. & Pradera, A. & Mesiar, R. & Beliakov, G., 2013. "Generalization of the weighted voting method using penalty functions constructed via faithful restricted dissimilarity functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(3), pages 472-478.
    2. Yan, Hong-Bin & Ma, Tieju, 2015. "A group decision-making approach to uncertain quality function deployment based on fuzzy preference relation and fuzzy majority," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(3), pages 815-829.
    3. Michel Grabisch & Jean-Luc Marichal & Radko Mesiar & Endre Pap, 2011. "Aggregation functions: Means," Post-Print hal-00539028, HAL.
    4. Llamazares, Bonifacio, 2004. "Simple and absolute special majorities generated by OWA operators," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(3), pages 707-720, November.
    5. Cabrerizo, Francisco Javier & Herrera-Viedma, Enrique & Pedrycz, Witold, 2013. "A method based on PSO and granular computing of linguistic information to solve group decision making problems defined in heterogeneous contexts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(3), pages 624-633.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Hierro, A.F. Roldán López & Bustince, H. & Fernández, J. & Mesiar, R. & Roldán, C., 2018. "Two novel methodologies for considering aggregation functions by implicit equations and minimization problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 670-681.
    2. Zhou, Wei & Xu, Zeshui, 2016. "Generalized asymmetric linguistic term set and its application to qualitative decision making involving risk appetites," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 610-621.
    3. Bustince, H. & Fernandez, J. & Kolesárová, A. & Mesiar, R., 2015. "Directional monotonicity of fusion functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 300-308.
    4. Llamazares, Bonifacio & Pérez-Asurmendi, Patrizia, 2013. "Triple-acyclicity in majorities based on difference in support," MPRA Paper 52218, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Jaume Belles‐Sampera & Montserrat Guillén & Miguel Santolino, 2014. "Beyond Value‐at‐Risk: GlueVaR Distortion Risk Measures," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(1), pages 121-134, January.
    6. Merigó, José M. & Palacios-Marqués, Daniel & Ribeiro-Navarrete, Belén, 2015. "Aggregation systems for sales forecasting," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 2299-2304.
    7. Merigó, José M. & Palacios-Marqués, Daniel & del Mar Benavides-Espinosa, María, 2015. "Aggregation methods to calculate the average price," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1574-1580.
    8. Richard Baron & Mostapha Diss & Eric Rémila & Philippe Solal, 2015. "A geometric examination of majorities based on difference in support," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 45(1), pages 123-153, June.
    9. Kelin Luo & Yinfeng Xu & Bowen Zhang & Huili Zhang, 2018. "Creating an acceptable consensus ranking for group decision making," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 307-328, July.
    10. Gagolewski, Marek, 2015. "Spread measures and their relation to aggregation functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(2), pages 469-477.
    11. Belles-Sampera, Jaume & Merigó, José M. & Guillén, Montserrat & Santolino, Miguel, 2013. "The connection between distortion risk measures and ordered weighted averaging operators," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 411-420.
    12. Juan Bernabé-Moreno & Álvaro Tejeda-Lorente & Carlos Porcel-Gallego & Enrique Herrera-Viedma, 2018. "Leveraging Localized Social Media Insights for Industry Early Warning Systems," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 357-385, January.
    13. Yucheng Dong & Yao Li & Ying He & Xia Chen, 2021. "Preference–Approval Structures in Group Decision Making: Axiomatic Distance and Aggregation," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 273-295, December.
    14. Dombi, József & Jónás, Tamás, 2022. "Weighted aggregation systems and an expectation level-based weighting and scoring procedure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(2), pages 580-588.
    15. Michel Grabisch & Jean-Luc Marichal & Radko Mesiar & Endre Pap, 2011. "Aggregation functions: construction methods, conjunctive, disjunctive and mixed classes," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-00539032, HAL.
    16. Yupeng Li & Zhaotong Wang & Xiaoyu Zhong & Fan Zou, 2019. "Identification of influential function modules within complex products and systems based on weighted and directed complex networks," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(6), pages 2375-2390, August.
    17. D. E. Ighravwe & S. A. Oke, 2017. "A manufacturing system energy-efficient optimisation model for maintenance-production workforce size determination using integrated fuzzy logic and quality function deployment approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(4), pages 683-703, December.
    18. Mario Maggi & Maria-Laura Torrente & Pierpaolo Uberti, 2020. "Proper measures of connectedness," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 547-571, December.
    19. Mostapha Diss & Patrizia Pérez-Asurmendi, 2016. "Probabilities of Consistent Election Outcomes with Majorities Based on Difference in Support," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 967-994, September.
    20. Veronica Cappelli & Simone Cerreia-Vioglio & Fabio Maccheroni & Massimo Marinacci & Stefania Minardi, 2021. "Sources of Uncertainty and Subjective Prices," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 19(2), pages 872-912.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:250:y:2016:i:3:p:816-826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.