IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v310y2022i2d10.1007_s10479-021-04118-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Queueing models for cognitive wireless networks with sensing time of secondary users

Author

Listed:
  • Tuan Phung-Duc

    (University of Tsukuba)

  • Kohei Akutsu

    (University of Tsukuba)

  • Ken’ichi Kawanishi

    (Gunma University)

  • Osama Salameh

    (Arab American University)

  • Sabine Wittevrongel

    (Ghent University)

Abstract

This paper considers queueing models for cognitive radio networks that account for the sensing time of secondary users (SUs). In cognitive radio networks, secondary users are allowed to opportunistically use idle channels originally allocated to primary users (PUs). To this end, SUs must sense the state of the channels before transmission. After sensing, if an idle channel is available, the SU can start transmission immediately; otherwise, the SU must carry out another channel sensing. In this paper, we study two retrial queueing models with an unlimited number of sensing SUs, where PUs have preemptive priority over SUs. The two models differ in whether or not an arriving PU can interrupt a SU transmission also in case there are still idle channels available. We show that both models have the same stability condition and that the model without interruptions in case of available idle channels has a slightly lower number of sensing SUs than the model with interruptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Tuan Phung-Duc & Kohei Akutsu & Ken’ichi Kawanishi & Osama Salameh & Sabine Wittevrongel, 2022. "Queueing models for cognitive wireless networks with sensing time of secondary users," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 310(2), pages 641-660, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:310:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-021-04118-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-021-04118-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-021-04118-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-021-04118-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey Diamond & Attahiru Alfa, 1999. "Matrix analytic methods for a multi-server retrial queue with buffer," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 7(2), pages 249-266, December.
    2. J. Keilson & J. Cozzolino & H. Young, 1968. "A Service System with Unfilled Requests Repeated," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(6), pages 1126-1137, December.
    3. I. L. Mitrany & B. Avi-Itzhak, 1968. "A Many-Server Queue with Service Interruptions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 628-638, June.
    4. Hiroyuki Sakurai & Tuan Phung-Duc, 2015. "Two-way communication retrial queues with multiple types of outgoing calls," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 23(2), pages 466-492, July.
    5. Osama Salameh & Koen De Turck & Herwig Bruneel & Chris Blondia & Sabine Wittevrongel, 2017. "Analysis of secondary user performance in cognitive radio networks with reactive spectrum handoff," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 65(3), pages 539-550, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jain, Madhu & Dhibar, Sibasish, 2023. "ANFIS and metaheuristic optimization for strategic joining policy with re-attempt and vacation," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 57-84.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evsey Morozov & Stepan Rogozin & Hung Q. Nguyen & Tuan Phung-Duc, 2022. "Modified Erlang Loss System for Cognitive Wireless Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Sheng Zhu & Jinting Wang & Bin Liu, 2020. "Equilibrium joining strategies in the Mn/G/1 queue with server breakdowns and repairs," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 2163-2187, December.
    3. KM Rashmi & S. K. Samanta, 2024. "Analysis of Two-Way Communication in $$M_1^X, M_2/G_1,G_2/1$$ M 1 X , M 2 / G 1 , G 2 / 1 Retrial Queue Under the Constant Retrial Policy," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 1-32, December.
    4. Se Won Lee & Bara Kim & Jeongsim Kim, 2022. "Analysis of the waiting time distribution in M/G/1 retrial queues with two way communication," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 310(2), pages 505-518, March.
    5. Ying-Mei Tu & Hsin-Nan Chen, 2010. "Capacity planning with sequential time constraints under various control policies in the back-end of wafer fabrications," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(8), pages 1258-1264, August.
    6. Muthukrishnan Senthil Kumar & Aresh Dadlani & Kiseon Kim, 2020. "Performance analysis of an unreliable M/G/1 retrial queue with two-way communication," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 2267-2280, December.
    7. Madhu Jain & Sandeep Kaur & Parminder Singh, 2021. "Supplementary variable technique (SVT) for non-Markovian single server queue with service interruption (QSI)," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 2203-2246, December.
    8. Jeongsim Kim & Bara Kim, 2016. "A survey of retrial queueing systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 247(1), pages 3-36, December.
    9. Sauer Cornelia & Daduna Hans, 2003. "Availability Formulas and Performance Measures for Separable Degradable Networks," Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 18(2), pages 165-194, January.
    10. Legros, Benjamin, 2021. "Routing analyses for call centers with human and automated services," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    11. Pedram Sahba & Bariş Balciog̃lu & Dragan Banjevic, 2013. "Analysis of the finite‐source multiclass priority queue with an unreliable server and setup time," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(4), pages 331-342, June.
    12. Miaomiao Yu & Yinghui Tang, 2022. "Analysis of a renewal batch arrival queue with a fault-tolerant server using shift operator method," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2831-2858, July.
    13. Hoseinpour, Pooya & Ahmadi-Javid, Amir, 2016. "A profit-maximization location-capacity model for designing a service system with risk of service interruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 113-134.
    14. Quan-Lin Li & Yu Ying & Yiqiang Zhao, 2006. "A BMAP/G/1 Retrial Queue with a Server Subject to Breakdowns and Repairs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 233-270, January.
    15. Florin Avram & Donatien Fotso Chedom, 2011. "On symbolic RG factorization of quasi-birth-and-death processes," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 19(2), pages 317-335, December.
    16. Jain, Madhu & Dhibar, Sibasish, 2023. "ANFIS and metaheuristic optimization for strategic joining policy with re-attempt and vacation," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 57-84.
    17. Krishnamoorthy, A. & Babu, S. & Narayanan, Viswanath C., 2009. "The MAP/(PH/PH)/1 queue with self-generation of priorities and non-preemptive service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(1), pages 174-185, May.
    18. B. Krishna Kumar & R. Rukmani & A. Thanikachalam & V. Kanakasabapathi, 2018. "Performance analysis of retrial queue with server subject to two types of breakdowns and repairs," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 521-559, July.
    19. Baykal-Gürsoy, M. & Xiao, W. & Ozbay, K., 2009. "Modeling traffic flow interrupted by incidents," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(1), pages 127-138, May.
    20. Nadav Lavi & Hanoch Levy, 2020. "Admit or preserve? Addressing server failures in cloud computing task management," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 94(3), pages 279-325, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:310:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-021-04118-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.