IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v307y2021i1d10.1007_s10479-021-04168-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Appointment games with unobservable and observable schedules

Author

Listed:
  • Matthias Deceuninck

    (Ghent University)

  • Stijn Vuyst

    (Ghent University
    Flanders Make)

  • Dieter Claeys

    (Ghent University
    Flanders Make)

  • Dieter Fiems

    (Ghent University)

Abstract

Appointment scheduling assigns start times in a session or consultation block to a set of tasks that share a common resource. For a generic repeated appointment scheduling problem, we study the trade-off between waiting for an appointment and waiting at the appointed time. Assuming that being scheduled later during a session implies that one has to wait longer for service (on average), it is often beneficial to choose a consultation block further away. We study this trade-off both when the patients have no information on how many patients are already scheduled in future consultation blocks and when they can observe the future block schedules. By some numerical examples, we find that in both cases the rational choice considerably changes between consecutive appointment blocks, patients favouring later blocks when the next appointment block starts in the near future. We also compare the rational choice with the socially optimal schedule and find that socially optimal scheduling can significantly reduce the waiting cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthias Deceuninck & Stijn Vuyst & Dieter Claeys & Dieter Fiems, 2021. "Appointment games with unobservable and observable schedules," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 307(1), pages 93-110, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:307:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-021-04168-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-021-04168-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-021-04168-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-021-04168-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jacob Feldman & Nan Liu & Huseyin Topaloglu & Serhan Ziya, 2014. "Appointment Scheduling Under Patient Preference and No-Show Behavior," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(4), pages 794-811, August.
    2. Wen-Ya Wang & Diwakar Gupta, 2011. "Adaptive Appointment Systems with Patient Preferences," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 373-389, July.
    3. Fiems, Dieter & Prabhu, Balakrishna & De Turck, Koen, 2019. "Travel times, rational queueing and the macroscopic fundamental diagram of traffic flow," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 524(C), pages 412-421.
    4. Lawrence W. Robinson & Rachel R. Chen, 2010. "A Comparison of Traditional and Open-Access Policies for Appointment Scheduling," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 330-346, June.
    5. Laurens G. Debo & Christine Parlour & Uday Rajan, 2012. "Signaling Quality via Queues," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(5), pages 876-891, May.
    6. Youngsub Chun & Nari Park & Duygu Yengin, 2015. "Coincidence of Cooperative Game Theoretic Solutions in the Appointment Problem," School of Economics and Public Policy Working Papers 2015-09, University of Adelaide, School of Economics and Public Policy.
    7. Nikolay Osadchiy & Diwas KC, 2017. "Are Patients Patient? The Role of Time to Appointment in Patient Flow," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(3), pages 469-490, March.
    8. Maniquet, Francois, 2003. "A characterization of the Shapley value in queueing problems," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 90-103, March.
    9. De Vuyst, Stijn & Bruneel, Herwig & Fiems, Dieter, 2014. "Computationally efficient evaluation of appointment schedules in health care," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(3), pages 1142-1154.
    10. Jonathan Patrick & Martin L. Puterman & Maurice Queyranne, 2008. "Dynamic Multipriority Patient Scheduling for a Diagnostic Resource," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(6), pages 1507-1525, December.
    11. Chun, Youngsub & Mitra, Manipushpak & Mutuswami, Suresh, 2019. "Egalitarianism in the queueing problem," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 48-56.
    12. Naor, P, 1969. "The Regulation of Queue Size by Levying Tolls," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 37(1), pages 15-24, January.
    13. Diwakar Gupta & Lei Wang, 2008. "Revenue Management for a Primary-Care Clinic in the Presence of Patient Choice," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(3), pages 576-592, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seokjun Youn & H. Neil Geismar & Michael Pinedo, 2022. "Planning and scheduling in healthcare for better care coordination: Current understanding, trending topics, and future opportunities," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4407-4423, December.
    2. Ahmadi-Javid, Amir & Jalali, Zahra & Klassen, Kenneth J, 2017. "Outpatient appointment systems in healthcare: A review of optimization studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 3-34.
    3. Katsumi Morikawa & Katsuhiko Takahashi & Daisuke Hirotani, 2018. "Performance evaluation of candidate appointment schedules using clearing functions," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 509-518, March.
    4. Namakshenas, Mohammad & Mazdeh, Mohammad Mahdavi & Braaksma, Aleida & Heydari, Mehdi, 2023. "Appointment scheduling for medical diagnostic centers considering time-sensitive pharmaceuticals: A dynamic robust optimization approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 1018-1031.
    5. Nan Liu & Stacey R. Finkelstein & Margaret E. Kruk & David Rosenthal, 2018. "When Waiting to See a Doctor Is Less Irritating: Understanding Patient Preferences and Choice Behavior in Appointment Scheduling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(5), pages 1975-1996, May.
    6. Yu Fu & Amarnath Banerjee, 2021. "A Stochastic Programming Model for Service Scheduling with Uncertain Demand: an Application in Open-Access Clinic Scheduling," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 1-32, September.
    7. Christos Zacharias & Michael Pinedo, 2017. "Managing Customer Arrivals in Service Systems with Multiple Identical Servers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 639-656, October.
    8. Van-Anh Truong, 2015. "Optimal Advance Scheduling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(7), pages 1584-1597, July.
    9. Kılıç, Hakan & Güneş, Evrim Didem, 2024. "Patient adherence in healthcare operations: A narrative review," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    10. Jiayi Liu & Jingui Xie & Kum Khiong Yang & Zhichao Zheng, 2019. "Effects of Rescheduling on Patient No-Show Behavior in Outpatient Clinics," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 780-797, October.
    11. Dogru, Ali K. & Melouk, Sharif H., 2019. "Adaptive appointment scheduling for patient-centered medical homes," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 166-181.
    12. Gang Du & Xinyue Li & Hui Hu & Xiaoling Ouyang, 2018. "Optimizing Daily Service Scheduling for Medical Diagnostic Equipment Considering Patient Satisfaction and Hospital Revenue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, September.
    13. Tugba Cayirli & Pinar Dursun & Evrim D. Gunes, 2019. "An integrated analysis of capacity allocation and patient scheduling in presence of seasonal walk-ins," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 524-561, June.
    14. Isabel Kaluza & Guido Voigt & Knut Haase & Antonia Dietze, 2024. "Control of Online-Appointment Systems When the Booking Status Signals Quality of Service," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 76(3), pages 397-432, September.
    15. Clifford Stein & Van-Anh Truong & Xinshang Wang, 2020. "Advance Service Reservations with Heterogeneous Customers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(7), pages 2929-2950, July.
    16. Lara Wiesche & Matthias Schacht & Brigitte Werners, 2017. "Strategies for interday appointment scheduling in primary care," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 403-418, September.
    17. Kazim Topuz & Timothy L. Urban & Robert A. Russell & Mehmet B. Yildirim, 2024. "Decision support system for appointment scheduling and overbooking under patient no-show behavior," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(1), pages 845-873, November.
    18. Yu Zhang & Vidyadhar G. Kulkarni, 2017. "Two-day appointment scheduling with patient preferences and geometric arrivals," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 85(1), pages 173-209, February.
    19. Jiang, Yangzi & Abouee-Mehrizi, Hossein & Diao, Yuhe, 2020. "Data-driven analytics to support scheduling of multi-priority multi-class patients with wait time targets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(3), pages 597-611.
    20. Paola Cappanera & Filippo Visintin & Carlo Banditori & Daniele Feo, 2019. "Evaluating the long-term effects of appointment scheduling policies in a magnetic resonance imaging setting," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 212-254, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:307:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-021-04168-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.