IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v293y2020i2d10.1007_s10479-019-03354-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A weight-consistent model for fuzzy supplier selection and order allocation problem

Author

Listed:
  • Sirin Suprasongsin

    (Thammasat University
    Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)

  • Pisal Yenradee

    (Thammasat University)

  • Van-Nam Huynh

    (Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)

Abstract

Decision support for Supplier Selection and Order Allocation (SSOA) is an important application area of multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) problems. In Amid et al. (Int J Prod Econ 131(1):139–145, 2011) proposed and developed a weighted maximin model to ensure the weight-consistent solution for SSOA in an MCDM problem under an uncertain environment. Essentially, this model is based on a weight-consistent constraint and a maximin aggregation operator. This paper reanalyzes the weighted maximin model in terms of the weight-consistent constraint, and then proposes a general weight-consistent model for SSOA in MCDM problems under uncertainty. In this paper, two existing models are reviewed and compared with the proposed model. Three datasets with different ranges of fuzzy demand and full factorial patterns of criteria weights are used to test the performances of the related models. The results showed that the proposed model always generates a weight-consistent Pareto-optimal solution in all cases, while the other existing models do not.

Suggested Citation

  • Sirin Suprasongsin & Pisal Yenradee & Van-Nam Huynh, 2020. "A weight-consistent model for fuzzy supplier selection and order allocation problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 293(2), pages 587-605, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:293:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-019-03354-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-019-03354-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-019-03354-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-019-03354-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pritee Ray & Mamata Jenamani, 2016. "Sourcing decision under disruption risk with supply and demand uncertainty: A newsvendor approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 237-262, February.
    2. Ravi Anupindi & Ram Akella, 1993. "Diversification Under Supply Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(8), pages 944-963, August.
    3. Ramanathan, R. & Ganesh, L. S., 1994. "Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(2), pages 249-265, December.
    4. Pritee Ray & Mamata Jenamani, 2016. "Sourcing decision under disruption risk with supply and demand uncertainty: A newsvendor approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 237-262, February.
    5. Gholamreza Bodaghi & Fariborz Jolai & Masoud Rabbani, 2018. "An integrated weighted fuzzy multi-objective model for supplier selection and order scheduling in a supply chain," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(10), pages 3590-3614, May.
    6. Zhang, Ju-liang & Zhang, Ming-yu, 2011. "Supplier selection and purchase problem with fixed cost and constrained order quantities under stochastic demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 1-7, January.
    7. Amid, Amin & Ghodsypour, S.H. & O'Brien, Christopher, 2009. "A weighted additive fuzzy multiobjective model for the supplier selection problem under price breaks in a supply Chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 323-332, October.
    8. Kuei-Hu Chang, 2019. "A novel supplier selection method that integrates the intuitionistic fuzzy weighted averaging method and a soft set with imprecise data," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 272(1), pages 139-157, January.
    9. Amid, A. & Ghodsypour, S.H. & O'Brien, C., 2011. "A weighted max-min model for fuzzy multi-objective supplier selection in a supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 139-145, May.
    10. Jose L. Andrade-Pineda & David Canca & Pedro L. Gonzalez-R, 2017. "On modelling non-linear quantity discounts in a supplier selection problem by mixed linear integer optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 258(2), pages 301-346, November.
    11. Weihua Liu & Shuqing Wang & DongLei Zhu & Di Wang & Xinran Shen, 2018. "Order allocation of logistics service supply chain with fairness concern and demand updating: model analysis and empirical examination," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 268(1), pages 177-213, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Federico Toffano & Michele Garraffa & Yiqing Lin & Steven Prestwich & Helmut Simonis & Nic Wilson, 2022. "A multi-objective supplier selection framework based on user-preferences," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 308(1), pages 609-640, January.
    2. Xu, Jianjun & Keblis, Matthew F. & Feng, Youyi & Chang, Yanling, 2017. "Optimal sourcing from a pool of suppliers with nonidentical salvage values," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 392-405.
    3. Svoboda, Josef & Minner, Stefan & Yao, Man, 2021. "Typology and literature review on multiple supplier inventory control models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 1-23.
    4. Jie Wu & Zhixin Chen & Xiang Ji, 2020. "Sustainable trade promotion decisions under demand disruption in manufacturer-retailer supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 115-143, July.
    5. Garvey, Myles D. & Carnovale, Steven, 2020. "The rippled newsvendor: A new inventory framework for modeling supply chain risk severity in the presence of risk propagation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    6. Md. Tarek Chowdhury & Aditi Sarkar & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Md. Abdul Moktadir, 2022. "A case study on strategies to deal with the impacts of COVID-19 pandemic in the food and beverage industry," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 166-178, June.
    7. Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Sobhan Asian & Mark Goh & S. Ali Torabi, 2019. "Managing sudden transportation disruptions in supply chains under delivery delay and quantity loss," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 783-814, February.
    8. Khadija Echefaj & Abdelkabir Charkaoui & Anass Cherrafi & Dmitry Ivanov, 2024. "Design of resilient and viable sourcing strategies in intertwined circular supply networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 337(1), pages 459-498, June.
    9. PrasannaVenkatesan, S. & Goh, M., 2016. "Multi-objective supplier selection and order allocation under disruption risk," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 124-142.
    10. Li, Zhaolin & Ou, Jinwen & Liang, Guitian, 2021. "Optimizing hospital drug procurement with rebate contracts," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    11. Mori, Masakatsu & Kobayashi, Ryoji & Samejima, Masaki & Komoda, Norihisa, 2017. "Risk-cost optimization for procurement planning in multi-tier supply chain by Pareto Local Search with relaxed acceptance criterion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 88-96.
    12. Guo Li & Lin Li & Mengqi Liu & Suresh P. Sethi, 2020. "Impact of power structures in a subcontracting assembly system," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 475-498, August.
    13. Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Priyabrata Chowdhury, 2020. "Strategies for Managing the Impacts of Disruptions During COVID-19: an Example of Toilet Paper," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(3), pages 283-293, September.
    14. Manerba, Daniele & Mansini, Renata & Perboli, Guido, 2018. "The Capacitated Supplier Selection problem with Total Quantity Discount policy and Activation Costs under uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 119-132.
    15. Shahin Mokhlesian, 2014. "How Do Contractors Select Suppliers for Greener Construction Projects? The Case of Three Swedish Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(7), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Manerba, Daniele & Mansini, Renata, 2012. "An exact algorithm for the Capacitated Total Quantity Discount Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(2), pages 287-300.
    17. Kelei Xue & Yongjian Li & Xueping Zhen & Wen Wang, 2020. "Managing the supply disruption risk: option contract or order commitment contract?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 985-1026, August.
    18. Hongtao Ren & Wenji Zhou & Marek Makowski & Hongbin Yan & Yadong Yu & Tieju Ma, 2021. "Incorporation of life cycle emissions and carbon price uncertainty into the supply chain network management of PVC production," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(2), pages 601-620, May.
    19. Guo, Cong & Li, Xueping, 2014. "A multi-echelon inventory system with supplier selection and order allocation under stochastic demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 37-47.
    20. Md. Rokonuzzaman, 2018. "The Integration of Extended Supply Chain with Sales and Operation Planning: A Conceptual Framework," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-21, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:293:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-019-03354-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.