IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v258y2017i2d10.1007_s10479-016-2135-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative note on the relaxation algorithms for the linear semi-infinite feasibility problem

Author

Listed:
  • A. Ferrer

    (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya)

  • M. A. Goberna

    (Alicante University)

  • E. González-Gutiérrez

    (Polytechnic University of Tulancingo)

  • M. I. Todorov

    (UDLAP)

Abstract

The problem (LFP) of finding a feasible solution to a given linear semi-infinite system arises in different contexts. This paper provides an empirical comparative study of relaxation algorithms for (LFP). In this study we consider, together with the classical algorithm, implemented with different values of the fixed parameter (the step size), a new relaxation algorithm with random parameter which outperforms the classical one in most test problems whatever fixed parameter is taken. This new algorithm converges geometrically to a feasible solution under mild conditions. The relaxation algorithms under comparison have been implemented using the extended cutting angle method for solving the global optimization subproblems.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Ferrer & M. A. Goberna & E. González-Gutiérrez & M. I. Todorov, 2017. "A comparative note on the relaxation algorithms for the linear semi-infinite feasibility problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 258(2), pages 587-612, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:258:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-016-2135-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-016-2135-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-016-2135-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-016-2135-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goberna, M.A. & Jeyakumar, V. & Li, G. & Vicente-Pérez, J., 2015. "Robust solutions to multi-objective linear programs with uncertain data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(3), pages 730-743.
    2. A.M. Bagirov & A.M. Rubinov, 2000. "Global Minimization of Increasing Positively Homogeneous Functions over the Unit Simplex," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 98(1), pages 171-187, December.
    3. A. Auslender & A. Ferrer & M. Goberna & M. López, 2015. "Comparative study of RPSALG algorithm for convex semi-infinite programming," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 59-87, January.
    4. Gleb Beliakov & Albert Ferrer, 2010. "Bounded lower subdifferentiability optimization techniques: applications," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 211-231, June.
    5. E. González-Gutiérrez & L. Hernández Rebollar & Maxim Todorov, 2012. "Relaxation methods for solving linear inequality systems: converging results," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 20(2), pages 426-436, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Le Thanh Tung, 2022. "Karush–Kuhn–Tucker optimality conditions and duality for multiobjective semi-infinite programming with vanishing constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(2), pages 1307-1334, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. A. Goberna & M. A. López, 2018. "Recent contributions to linear semi-infinite optimization: an update," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(1), pages 237-278, December.
    2. M. A. Goberna & M. A. López, 2017. "Recent contributions to linear semi-infinite optimization," 4OR, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 221-264, September.
    3. A. Auslender & A. Ferrer & M. Goberna & M. López, 2015. "Comparative study of RPSALG algorithm for convex semi-infinite programming," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 59-87, January.
    4. Goberna, M.A. & Jeyakumar, V. & Li, G. & Vicente-Pérez, J., 2022. "The radius of robust feasibility of uncertain mathematical programs: A Survey and recent developments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(3), pages 749-763.
    5. Groetzner, Patrick & Werner, Ralf, 2022. "Multiobjective optimization under uncertainty: A multiobjective robust (relative) regret approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(1), pages 101-115.
    6. Dranichak, Garrett M. & Wiecek, Margaret M., 2019. "On highly robust efficient solutions to uncertain multiobjective linear programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 20-30.
    7. Goberna, M.A. & Jeyakumar, V. & Li, G. & Vicente-Pérez, J., 2018. "Guaranteeing highly robust weakly efficient solutions for uncertain multi-objective convex programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(1), pages 40-50.
    8. Klamroth, Kathrin & Köbis, Elisabeth & Schöbel, Anita & Tammer, Christiane, 2017. "A unified approach to uncertain optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(2), pages 403-420.
    9. Frauke Liers & Lars Schewe & Johannes Thürauf, 2022. "Radius of Robust Feasibility for Mixed-Integer Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 243-261, January.
    10. Erin K. Doolittle & Hervé L. M. Kerivin & Margaret M. Wiecek, 2018. "Robust multiobjective optimization with application to Internet routing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 487-525, December.
    11. Nguyen Minh Tung & Mai Duy, 2023. "Constraint qualifications and optimality conditions for robust nonsmooth semi-infinite multiobjective optimization problems," 4OR, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 151-176, March.
    12. Botte, Marco & Schöbel, Anita, 2019. "Dominance for multi-objective robust optimization concepts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 430-440.
    13. Jiawei Chen & Jun Li & Xiaobing Li & Yibing Lv & Jen-Chih Yao, 2020. "Radius of Robust Feasibility of System of Convex Inequalities with Uncertain Data," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 184(2), pages 384-399, February.
    14. Ariel Neufeld & Antonis Papapantoleon & Qikun Xiang, 2023. "Model-Free Bounds for Multi-Asset Options Using Option-Implied Information and Their Exact Computation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(4), pages 2051-2068, April.
    15. Albert Ferrer & Adil Bagirov & Gleb Beliakov, 2015. "Solving DC programs using the cutting angle method," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 71-89, January.
    16. Thai Doan Chuong, 2021. "Radius of Robust Global Error Bound for Piecewise Linear Inequality Systems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 191(1), pages 68-82, October.
    17. Morteza Rahimi & Majid Soleimani-damaneh, 2020. "Characterization of Norm-Based Robust Solutions in Vector Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 185(2), pages 554-573, May.
    18. Rubinov, A.M. & Soukhorokova, N.V. & Ugon, J., 2006. "Classes and clusters in data analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(3), pages 849-865, September.
    19. Kuhn, K. & Raith, A. & Schmidt, M. & Schöbel, A., 2016. "Bi-objective robust optimisation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(2), pages 418-431.
    20. Morteza Rahimi & Majid Soleimani-damaneh, 2018. "Robustness in Deterministic Vector Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 137-162, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:258:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-016-2135-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.