IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v242y2016i2d10.1007_s10479-013-1435-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new multi-criteria scenario-based solution approach for stochastic forward/reverse supply chain network design

Author

Listed:
  • Hamed Soleimani

    (Amirkabir University)

  • Mirmehdi Seyyed-Esfahani

    (Amirkabir University)

  • Mohsen Akbarpour Shirazi

    (Amirkabir University)

Abstract

Analyzing current trends in supply chain management, lead to find unavoidable steps toward closing the loop of supply chain. In order to expect best performance of Closed-Loop Supply Chain (CLSC) network, an integrated approach in considering design and planning decision levels is necessary. Further, real markets usually contain uncertain parameters such as demands and prices of products. Therefore, the next important step is considering uncertain parameters. In order to cope with designing and planning a closed-loop supply chain, this paper proposes a multi-period, multi-product closed-loop supply chain network with stochastic demand and price in a Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) structure. A multi criteria scenario based solution approach is then developed to find optimal solution through some logical scenarios and three comparing criteria. Mean, Standard Deviation (SD), and Coefficient of Variation (CV), which are the mentioned criteria for finding the optimal solution. Sensitivity analyses are also undertaken to validate efficiency of the solution approach. The computational study reveals the acceptability of proposed solution approach for the stochastic model. Finally, a real case study in an Indian manufacturer is evaluated to ensure applicability of the model and the solution methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamed Soleimani & Mirmehdi Seyyed-Esfahani & Mohsen Akbarpour Shirazi, 2016. "A new multi-criteria scenario-based solution approach for stochastic forward/reverse supply chain network design," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 242(2), pages 399-421, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:242:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-013-1435-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-013-1435-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-013-1435-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-013-1435-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Włodzimierz Ogryczak, 2000. "Multiple criteria linear programming model for portfolio selection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 97(1), pages 143-162, December.
    2. Krarup, Jakob & Pruzan, Peter Mark, 1983. "The simple plant location problem: Survey and synthesis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 36-57, January.
    3. Maurizio Faccio & Alessandro Persona & Fabio Sgarbossa & Giorgia Zanin, 2011. "Multi-stage supply network design in case of reverse flows: a closed-loop approach," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(2), pages 157-191.
    4. Francas, David & Minner, Stefan, 2009. "Manufacturing network configuration in supply chains with product recovery," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 757-769, August.
    5. V. Daniel R. Guide & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2009. "OR FORUM---The Evolution of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Research," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 10-18, February.
    6. Chouinard, Marc & D'Amours, Sophie & Aït-Kadi, Daoud, 2008. "A stochastic programming approach for designing supply loops," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 657-677, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Surya Prakash & Sameer Kumar & Gunjan Soni & Vipul Jain & Ajay Pal Singh Rathore, 2020. "Closed-loop supply chain network design and modelling under risks and demand uncertainty: an integrated robust optimization approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 837-864, July.
    2. Van Engeland, Jens & Beliën, Jeroen & De Boeck, Liesje & De Jaeger, Simon, 2020. "Literature review: Strategic network optimization models in waste reverse supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Bahman Naderi & Kannan Govindan & Hamed Soleimani, 2020. "A Benders decomposition approach for a real case supply chain network design with capacity acquisition and transporter planning: wheat distribution network," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 685-705, August.
    4. Hongtao Ren & Wenji Zhou & Marek Makowski & Hongbin Yan & Yadong Yu & Tieju Ma, 2021. "Incorporation of life cycle emissions and carbon price uncertainty into the supply chain network management of PVC production," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(2), pages 601-620, May.
    5. Tosarkani, Babak Mohamadpour & Amin, Saman Hassanzadeh & Zolfagharinia, Hossein, 2020. "A scenario-based robust possibilistic model for a multi-objective electronic reverse logistics network," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    6. Alireza Bakhshi & Jafar Heydari, 2023. "An optimal put option contract for a reverse supply chain: case of remanufacturing capacity uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 37-60, May.
    7. Abbas Al-Refaie & Yasmeen Jarrar & Natalija Lepkova, 2021. "Sustainable Design of a Multi-Echelon Closed Loop Supply Chain under Uncertainty for Durable Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-34, October.
    8. Guanshuang Jiang & Qi Wang & Ke Wang & Qianyu Zhang & Jian Zhou, 2020. "A Novel Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Design Considering Enterprise Profit and Service Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Li, Xiaohong & Yang, Dong & Hu, Mengqi, 2018. "A scenario-based stochastic programming approach for the product configuration problem under uncertainties and carbon emission regulations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 126-146.
    10. Kannan Govindan, 2016. "Evolutionary algorithms for supply chain management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 242(2), pages 195-206, July.
    11. Soleimani, Hamed, 2021. "A new sustainable closed-loop supply chain model for mining industry considering fixed-charged transportation: A case study in a travertine quarry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    12. Yang Hu, 2023. "Perspectives in closed-loop supply chains network design considering risk and uncertainty factors," Papers 2306.04819, arXiv.org.
    13. Yang, Y. & Lin, J. & Hedenstierna, C.P.T. & Zhou, L., 2023. "The more the better? The impact of the number and location of product recovery options on the system dynamics in a closed-loop supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    14. Miguel Ortiz-Barrios & Juan Cabarcas-Reyes & Alessio Ishizaka & Maria Barbati & Natalia Jaramillo-Rueda & Giovani Jesús Carrascal-Zambrano, 2021. "A hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for selecting a sustainable supplier of forklift filters: a case study from the mining industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 307(1), pages 443-481, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Govindan, Kannan & Soleimani, Hamed & Kannan, Devika, 2015. "Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 603-626.
    2. Marta Mańkowska & Izabela Kotowska & Michał Pluciński, 2020. "Seaports as Nodal Points of Circular Supply Chains: Opportunities and Challenges for Secondary Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Baptista, Susana & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana Paula & Escudero, Laureano F. & Gomes, Maria Isabel & Pizarro, Celeste, 2019. "On risk management of a two-stage stochastic mixed 0–1 model for the closed-loop supply chain design problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 91-107.
    4. Chandra Ade Irawan & Dylan Jones, 2019. "Formulation and solution of a two-stage capacitated facility location problem with multilevel capacities," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 272(1), pages 41-67, January.
    5. Liu, Wenjie & Liu, Wei & Shen, Ningning & Xu, Zhitao & Xie, Naiming & Chen, Jian & Zhou, Huiyu, 2022. "Pricing and collection decisions of a closed-loop supply chain with fuzzy demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    6. Jang Ho Kim & Yongjae Lee & Woo Chang Kim & Frank J. Fabozzi, 2022. "Goal-based investing based on multi-stage robust portfolio optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 313(2), pages 1141-1158, June.
    7. Patricia van Loon & Luk N. Van Wassenhove & Ales Mihelic, 2022. "Designing a circular business strategy: 7 years of evolution at a large washing machine manufacturer," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1030-1041, March.
    8. Matthias Kalverkamp & Alexandra Pehlken & Thorsten Wuest, 2017. "Cascade Use and the Management of Product Lifecycles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-23, August.
    9. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Chow, Pui-Sze & Lee, Chang Hwan & Shen, Bin, 2018. "Used intimate apparel collection programs: A game-theoretic analytical study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 44-62.
    10. Hong, Zhaofu & Dai, Wei & Luh, Hsing & Yang, Chenchen, 2018. "Optimal configuration of a green product supply chain with guaranteed service time and emission constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(2), pages 663-677.
    11. Zhang, Abraham & Wang, Jason X. & Farooque, Muhammad & Wang, Yulan & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "Multi-dimensional circular supply chain management: A comparative review of the state-of-the-art practices and research," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    12. Feng Dai & Yi Chen, 2023. "Integrated dynamic municipal solid waste transfer station location decision study based on the dynamic MSW generation," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 6033-6047, July.
    13. Rika Ampuh Hadiguna, 2012. "Decision support framework for risk assessment of sustainable supply chain," International Journal of Logistics Economics and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(1/2), pages 35-54.
    14. Harkness, Joseph & ReVelle, Charles, 2003. "Facility location with increasing production costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 1-13, February.
    15. Mazzola, Joseph B. & Neebe, Alan W., 1999. "Lagrangian-relaxation-based solution procedures for a multiproduct capacitated facility location problem with choice of facility type," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 285-299, June.
    16. Melachrinoudis, Emanuel & Min, Hokey, 2000. "The dynamic relocation and phase-out of a hybrid, two-echelon plant/warehousing facility: A multiple objective approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 1-15, May.
    17. Berman, Oded & Krass, Dmitry & Menezes, Mozart B.C., 2016. "Directed assignment vs. customer choice in location inventory models," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 179-191.
    18. Wu, Xiaole & Zhou, Yu, 2019. "Buyer-specific versus uniform pricing in a closed-loop supply chain with third-party remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 548-560.
    19. Shulin Wang & Shanhua Wu, 2023. "Optimizing the Location of Virtual-Shopping-Experience Stores Based on the Minimum Impact on Urban Traffic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-25, June.
    20. Chloe Kim Glaeser & Marshall Fisher & Xuanming Su, 2019. "Optimal Retail Location: Empirical Methodology and Application to Practice," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 86-102, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:242:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-013-1435-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.