IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v213y2014i1p3-2510.1007-s10479-011-0971-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal solutions for a dock assignment problem with trailer transportation

Author

Listed:
  • Lotte Berghman
  • Roel Leus
  • Frits Spieksma

Abstract

This paper presents a model for a dock assignment problem, where trailers need to be assigned to gates for a given period of time for loading or unloading activities. The parking lot is used as a buffer zone. Transportation between the parking lot and the gates is performed by additional resources called terminal tractors. The problem is modeled as a three-stage flexible flow shop, where the first and the third stage share the same identical parallel machines and the second stage consists of a different set of identical parallel machines. We examine multiple integer-programming formulations for the parallel-machine model in stage two and for the three-stage flow shop and we provide extensive computational results. Our goal is to explore the limits of the instance sizes that can be solved to guaranteed optimality within acceptable running times using integer programming. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Lotte Berghman & Roel Leus & Frits Spieksma, 2014. "Optimal solutions for a dock assignment problem with trailer transportation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 213(1), pages 3-25, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:213:y:2014:i:1:p:3-25:10.1007/s10479-011-0971-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-011-0971-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-011-0971-7
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-011-0971-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. DYER, Martin E. & WOLSEY, Laurence A., 1990. "Formulating the single machine sequencing problem with release dates as a mixed integer program," LIDAM Reprints CORE 878, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    2. Vipul Jain & Ignacio E. Grossmann, 2001. "Algorithms for Hybrid MILP/CP Models for a Class of Optimization Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 258-276, November.
    3. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2010. "A survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 615-627, May.
    4. Kedad-Sidhoum, Safia & Solis, Yasmin Rios & Sourd, Francis, 2008. "Lower bounds for the earliness-tardiness scheduling problem on parallel machines with distinct due dates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(3), pages 1305-1316, September.
    5. Cheng, T. C. E. & Sin, C. C. S., 1990. "A state-of-the-art review of parallel-machine scheduling research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 271-292, August.
    6. SADYKOV, Ruslan & WOLSEY, Laurence A., 2006. "Integer programming and constraint programming in solving a multimachine assignment scheduling problem with deadlines and release dates," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1854, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    7. Carlos Paternina-Arboleda & Jairo Montoya-Torres & Milton Acero-Dominguez & Maria Herrera-Hernandez, 2008. "Scheduling jobs on a k-stage flexible flow-shop," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 29-40, November.
    8. C. Cheong & K. Tan & D. Liu & C. Lin, 2010. "Multi-objective and prioritized berth allocation in container ports," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 63-103, November.
    9. Ruslan Sadykov & Laurence A. Wolsey, 2006. "Integer Programming and Constraint Programming in Solving a Multimachine Assignment Scheduling Problem with Deadlines and Release Dates," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 209-217, May.
    10. Moursli, O. & Pochet, Y., 2000. "A branch-and-bound algorithm for the hybrid flowshop," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-3), pages 113-125, March.
    11. Kis, Tamas & Pesch, Erwin, 2005. "A review of exact solution methods for the non-preemptive multiprocessor flowshop problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(3), pages 592-608, August.
    12. SOUSA, Jorge P. & WOLSEY, Laurence A., 1992. "A time indexed formulation of non-preemptive single machine scheduling problems," LIDAM Reprints CORE 984, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    13. Mohamed Haouari & Lotfi Hidri & Anis Gharbi, 2006. "Optimal Scheduling of a Two-stage Hybrid Flow Shop," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 64(1), pages 107-124, August.
    14. Jonathan F. Bard & Siwate Rojanasoonthon, 2006. "A branch‐and‐price algorithm for parallel machine scheduling with time windows and job priorities," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(1), pages 24-44, February.
    15. Miao, Zhaowei & Lim, Andrew & Ma, Hong, 2009. "Truck dock assignment problem with operational time constraint within crossdocks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 105-115, January.
    16. Christofides, Nicos & Alvarez-Valdes, R. & Tamarit, J. M., 1987. "Project scheduling with resource constraints: A branch and bound approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 262-273, June.
    17. Mellouli, Racem & Sadfi, Chrif & Chu, Chengbin & Kacem, Imed, 2009. "Identical parallel-machine scheduling under availability constraints to minimize the sum of completion times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(3), pages 1150-1165, September.
    18. Graves, Stephen C., 1983. "Scheduling of re-entrant flow shops," Working papers 1438-83., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    19. Blazewicz, Jacek & Dror, Moshe & Weglarz, Jan, 1991. "Mathematical programming formulations for machine scheduling: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 283-300, April.
    20. Louis-Philippe Bigras & Michel Gamache & Gilles Savard, 2008. "Time-Indexed Formulations and the Total Weighted Tardiness Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 133-142, February.
    21. Ebru K. Bish & Thin‐Yin Leong & Chung‐Lun Li & Jonathan W. C. Ng & David Simchi‐Levi, 2001. "Analysis of a new vehicle scheduling and location problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(5), pages 363-385, August.
    22. L Tang & H Xuan, 2006. "Lagrangian relaxation algorithms for real-time hybrid flowshop scheduling with finite intermediate buffers," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(3), pages 316-324, March.
    23. E. DYER, Martin & WOLSEY, Laurence A., 1990. "Formulating the single machine sequencing problem with release dates as a mixed integer program," LIDAM Reprints CORE 917, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    24. J.M. van den Akker & C.A.J. Hurkens & M.W.P. Savelsbergh, 2000. "Time-Indexed Formulations for Machine Scheduling Problems: Column Generation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 111-124, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Kowalczyk & Roel Leus, 2017. "An exact algorithm for parallel machine scheduling with conflicts," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 355-372, August.
    2. Fan Yang & Roel Leus, 2021. "Scheduling hybrid flow shops with time windows," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 133-158, April.
    3. Gelareh, Shahin & Monemi, Rahimeh Neamatian & Semet, Frédéric & Goncalves, Gilles, 2016. "A branch-and-cut algorithm for the truck dock assignment problem with operational time constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 1144-1152.
    4. Berghman, Lotte & Leus, Roel, 2015. "Practical solutions for a dock assignment problem with trailer transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(3), pages 787-799.
    5. Giorgi Tadumadze & Nils Boysen & Simon Emde, 2020. "Robust spotter scheduling in trailer yards," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 42(4), pages 995-1021, December.
    6. Xi, Xiang & Changchun, Liu & Yuan, Wang & Loo Hay, Lee, 2020. "Two-stage conflict robust optimization models for cross-dock truck scheduling problem under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    7. Gang Chen & Liping Jiang, 2016. "Managing customer arrivals with time windows: a case of truck arrivals at a congested container terminal," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 244(2), pages 349-365, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Berghman, Lotte & Leus, Roel, 2015. "Practical solutions for a dock assignment problem with trailer transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(3), pages 787-799.
    2. Francis Sourd, 2009. "New Exact Algorithms for One-Machine Earliness-Tardiness Scheduling," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 167-175, February.
    3. Natashia Boland & Riley Clement & Hamish Waterer, 2016. "A Bucket Indexed Formulation for Nonpreemptive Single Machine Scheduling Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 14-30, February.
    4. Stéphane Dauzère-Pérès & Sigrid Lise Nonås, 2023. "An improved decision support model for scheduling production in an engineer-to-order manufacturer," 4OR, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 247-300, June.
    5. Yunpeng Pan & Zhe Liang, 2017. "Dual relaxations of the time-indexed ILP formulation for min–sum scheduling problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 249(1), pages 197-213, February.
    6. Artur Alves Pessoa & Teobaldo Bulhões & Vitor Nesello & Anand Subramanian, 2022. "Exact Approaches for Single Machine Total Weighted Tardiness Batch Scheduling," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1512-1530, May.
    7. Pasquale Avella & Maurizio Boccia & Bernardo D’Auria, 2005. "Near-Optimal Solutions of Large-Scale Single-Machine Scheduling Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 183-191, May.
    8. Zhang, Hanxiao & Li, Yan-Fu, 2022. "Integrated optimization of test case selection and sequencing for reliability testing of the mainboard of Internet backbone routers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 183-194.
    9. Rachid Benmansour & Oliver Braun & Saïd Hanafi, 2019. "The single-processor scheduling problem with time restrictions: complexity and related problems," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 465-471, August.
    10. Arthur Kramer & Anand Subramanian, 2019. "A unified heuristic and an annotated bibliography for a large class of earliness–tardiness scheduling problems," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 21-57, February.
    11. Daniel Kowalczyk & Roel Leus, 2018. "A Branch-and-Price Algorithm for Parallel Machine Scheduling Using ZDDs and Generic Branching," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 768-782, November.
    12. Gedik, Ridvan & Rainwater, Chase & Nachtmann, Heather & Pohl, Ed A., 2016. "Analysis of a parallel machine scheduling problem with sequence dependent setup times and job availability intervals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 640-650.
    13. Martin W. P. Savelsbergh & R. N. Uma & Joel Wein, 2005. "An Experimental Study of LP-Based Approximation Algorithms for Scheduling Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 123-136, February.
    14. Louis-Philippe Bigras & Michel Gamache & Gilles Savard, 2008. "Time-Indexed Formulations and the Total Weighted Tardiness Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 133-142, February.
    15. Pereira, Jordi & Vásquez, Óscar C., 2017. "The single machine weighted mean squared deviation problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 515-529.
    16. Kerem Bülbül & Halil Şen, 2017. "An exact extended formulation for the unrelated parallel machine total weighted completion time problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 373-389, August.
    17. Ruiz, Rubén & Vázquez-Rodríguez, José Antonio, 2010. "The hybrid flow shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(1), pages 1-18, August.
    18. Jain, A. S. & Meeran, S., 1999. "Deterministic job-shop scheduling: Past, present and future," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 390-434, March.
    19. Fan Yang & Roel Leus, 2021. "Scheduling hybrid flow shops with time windows," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 133-158, April.
    20. van den Akker, J.M. & Savelsbergh, M.W.P. & van Hoesel, C.P.M., 1997. "A polyhedral approach to single-machine scheduling problems," Research Memorandum 002, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:213:y:2014:i:1:p:3-25:10.1007/s10479-011-0971-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.