IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v195y2012i1p73-9610.1007-s10479-011-0911-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient algorithms for heavy-tail analysis under interval uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Vladik Kreinovich
  • Monchaya Chiangpradit
  • Wararit Panichkitkosolkul

Abstract

Most applications of statistics to science and engineering are based on the assumption that the corresponding random variables are normally distributed, i.e., distributed according to Gaussian law in which the probability density function ρ(x) exponentially decreases with x: ρ(x)∼exp (−k⋅x 2 ). Normal distributions indeed frequently occur in practice. However, there are also many practical situations, including situations from mathematical finance, in which we encounter heavy-tailed distributions, i.e., distributions in which ρ(x) decreases as ρ(x)∼x −α . To properly take this uncertainty into account when making decisions, it is necessary to estimate the parameters of such distributions based on the sample data x 1 ,…,x n —and thus, to predict the size and the probabilities of large deviations. The most well-known statistical estimates for such distributions are the Hill estimator H for α and the Weismann estimator W for the corresponding quantiles. These estimators are based on the simplifying assumption that the sample values x i are known exactly. In practice, we often know the values x i only approximately—e.g., we know the estimates $\widetilde{x}_{i}$ and we know the upper bounds Δ i on the estimation errors. In this case, the only information that we have about the actual (unknown) value x i is that x i belongs to the interval ${\mathbf{x}}_{i}=[\widetilde{x}_{i}-\Delta_{i},\widetilde{x} _{i}+\Delta_{i}]$ . Different combinations of values x i ∈ x i lead, in general, to different values of H and W. It is therefore desirable to find the ranges $[\underline{H},\overline{H}]$ and $[\underline{W},\overline{W}]$ of possible values of H and W. In this paper, we describe efficient algorithms for computing these ranges. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Suggested Citation

  • Vladik Kreinovich & Monchaya Chiangpradit & Wararit Panichkitkosolkul, 2012. "Efficient algorithms for heavy-tail analysis under interval uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 195(1), pages 73-96, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:195:y:2012:i:1:p:73-96:10.1007/s10479-011-0911-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-011-0911-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-011-0911-6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-011-0911-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stanley, H.E & Amaral, L.A.N & Gopikrishnan, P & Plerou, V, 2000. "Scale invariance and universality of economic fluctuations," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 283(1), pages 31-41.
    2. Mantegna,Rosario N. & Stanley,H. Eugene, 2007. "Introduction to Econophysics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521039871, October.
    3. Gabaix, Xavier & Gopikrishnan, Parameswaran & Plerou, Vasiliki & Stanley, H.Eugene, 2003. "Understanding the cubic and half-cubic laws of financial fluctuations," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 324(1), pages 1-5.
    4. Farmer, J. Doyne & Lux, Thomas, 2008. "Introduction to special issue on `Applications of Statistical Physics in Economics and Finance'," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 1-6, January.
    5. Carla Gomes & David Shmoys, 2004. "Approximations and Randomization to Boost CSP Techniques," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 130(1), pages 117-141, August.
    6. Stoyan Stoyanov & Borjana Racheva-Iotova & Svetlozar Rachev & Frank Fabozzi, 2010. "Stochastic models for risk estimation in volatile markets: a survey," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 293-309, April.
    7. Lux, Thomas, 2008. "Applications of statistical physics in finance and economics," Kiel Working Papers 1425, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    8. Benoit Mandelbrot, 2015. "The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Anastasios G Malliaris & William T Ziemba (ed.), THE WORLD SCIENTIFIC HANDBOOK OF FUTURES MARKETS, chapter 3, pages 39-78, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuxin Zhao & Shuai Chang & Chang Liu, 2015. "Multifractal theory with its applications in data management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 234(1), pages 133-150, November.
    2. Alexander Vinel & Pavlo A. Krokhmal, 2017. "Certainty equivalent measures of risk," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 249(1), pages 75-95, February.
    3. Haijun Li & Susan Xu & Way Kuo, 2014. "Asymptotic analysis of simultaneous damages in spatial Boolean models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 212(1), pages 139-154, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schinckus, Christophe, 2018. "Ising model, econophysics and analogies," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 508(C), pages 95-103.
    2. D. Sornette, 2014. "Physics and Financial Economics (1776-2014): Puzzles, Ising and Agent-Based models," Papers 1404.0243, arXiv.org.
    3. Didier SORNETTE, 2014. "Physics and Financial Economics (1776-2014): Puzzles, Ising and Agent-Based Models," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 14-25, Swiss Finance Institute.
    4. J. Doyne Farmer & Laszlo Gillemot & Fabrizio Lillo & Szabolcs Mike & Anindya Sen, 2004. "What really causes large price changes?," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(4), pages 383-397.
    5. Anirban Chakraborti & Ioane Muni Toke & Marco Patriarca & Frederic Abergel, 2011. "Econophysics review: I. Empirical facts," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(7), pages 991-1012.
    6. J. Doyne Farmer, 2002. "Market force, ecology and evolution," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 11(5), pages 895-953, November.
    7. M A Sánchez-Granero & J E Trinidad-Segovia & J Clara-Rahola & A M Puertas & F J De las Nieves, 2017. "A model for foreign exchange markets based on glassy Brownian systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, December.
    8. Taleb, Nassim Nicholas, 2009. "Errors, robustness, and the fourth quadrant," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 744-759, October.
    9. Schmidhuber, Christof, 2021. "Trends, reversion, and critical phenomena in financial markets," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 566(C).
    10. Gu, Gao-Feng & Zhou, Wei-Xing, 2007. "Statistical properties of daily ensemble variables in the Chinese stock markets," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 383(2), pages 497-506.
    11. Lisa Borland & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & Jean-Francois Muzy & Gilles Zumbach, 2005. "The Dynamics of Financial Markets -- Mandelbrot's multifractal cascades, and beyond," Science & Finance (CFM) working paper archive 500061, Science & Finance, Capital Fund Management.
    12. Mariani, M.C. & Florescu, I. & Beccar Varela, M.P. & Ncheuguim, E., 2010. "Study of memory effects in international market indices," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(8), pages 1653-1664.
    13. Baosheng Yuan & Kan Chen, 2006. "Impact of investor’s varying risk aversion on the dynamics of asset price fluctuations," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 1(2), pages 189-214, November.
    14. Shu-Heng Chen & Sai-Ping Li, 2011. "Econophysics: Bridges over a Turbulent Current," Papers 1107.5373, arXiv.org.
    15. Carlos León, 2014. "Scale-free tails in Colombian financial indexes: a primer," Borradores de Economia 11144, Banco de la Republica.
    16. LeBaron, Blake, 2006. "Agent-based Computational Finance," Handbook of Computational Economics, in: Leigh Tesfatsion & Kenneth L. Judd (ed.), Handbook of Computational Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 24, pages 1187-1233, Elsevier.
    17. Jovanovic, Franck & Schinckus, Christophe, 2017. "Econophysics and Financial Economics: An Emerging Dialogue," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780190205034.
    18. A. E. Biondo & A. Pluchino & A. Rapisarda, 2015. "Modelling Financial Markets by Self-Organized Criticality," Papers 1507.04298, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2015.
    19. Roberto Mota Navarro & Hern'an Larralde Ridaura, 2016. "A detailed heterogeneous agent model for a single asset financial market with trading via an order book," Papers 1601.00229, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2016.
    20. Gao-Feng Gu & Xiong Xiong & Yong-Jie Zhang & Wei Chen & Wei Zhang & Wei-Xing Zhou, 2014. "Stylized facts of price gaps in limit order books: Evidence from Chinese stocks," Papers 1405.1247, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:195:y:2012:i:1:p:73-96:10.1007/s10479-011-0911-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.