IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aistmt/v56y2004i4p701-720.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Order restricted randomized designs for control versus treatment comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Omer Ozturk
  • Steven MacEachern

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Omer Ozturk & Steven MacEachern, 2004. "Order restricted randomized designs for control versus treatment comparison," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 56(4), pages 701-720, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:aistmt:v:56:y:2004:i:4:p:701-720
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02506484
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02506484
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02506484?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Öztürk, Ömer & Wolfe, Douglas A., 2000. "Alternative ranked set sampling protocols for the sign test," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 15-23, March.
    2. Steven N. MacEachern & Ömer Öztürk & Douglas A. Wolfe & Gregory V. Stark, 2002. "A new ranked set sample estimator of variance," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(2), pages 177-188, May.
    3. Sinha Bimal K. & Sinha Bikas K. & Purkayastha Sumitra, 1996. "On Some Aspects Of Ranked Set Sampling For Estimation Of Normal And Exponential Parameters," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 14(3), pages 223-240, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Omer Ozturk & Richard Jarrett & Olena Kravchuk, 2024. "Order Restricted Randomized Block Designs," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 29(4), pages 831-852, December.
    2. Juan Du & Steven N. MacEachern, 2008. "Judgement Post-Stratification for Designed Experiments," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 345-354, June.
    3. Omer Ozturk & N. Balakrishnan, 2009. "Exact two-sample nonparametric test for quantile difference between two populations based on ranked set samples," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 61(1), pages 235-249, March.
    4. Jinguo Gao & Omer Ozturk, 2017. "Rank regression in order restricted randomised designs," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 231-257, April.
    5. Omer Ozturk & N. Balakrishnan, 2009. "An Exact Control-Versus-Treatment Comparison Test Based on Ranked Set Samples," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 1213-1222, December.
    6. Omer Ozturk & Asuman Turkmen, 2016. "Quantile inference based on clustered data," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 79(7), pages 867-893, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, You-Gan & Zhu, Min, 2005. "Optimal sign tests for data from ranked set samples," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 13-22, April.
    2. Barabesi, Lucio & El-Sharaawi, Abdel, 2001. "The efficiency of ranked set sampling for parameter estimation," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 189-199, June.
    3. Ehsan Zamanzade, 2019. "EDF-based tests of exponentiality in pair ranked set sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(6), pages 2141-2159, December.
    4. Nader Gemayel & Elizabeth Stasny & James Tackett & Douglas Wolfe, 2012. "Ranked set sampling: an auditing application," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 413-422, November.
    5. Wenshu Qian & Wangxue Chen & Xiaofang He, 2021. "Parameter estimation for the Pareto distribution based on ranked set sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 395-417, February.
    6. Vic Barnett & Maria Cecilia Mendes Barreto, 2001. "Estimators for a Poisson parameter using ranked set sampling," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(8), pages 929-941.
    7. Jesse Frey & Timothy G. Feeman, 2017. "Efficiency comparisons for partially rank-ordered set sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1149-1163, December.
    8. Raqab, Mohammad Z. & Kouider, Elies & Al-Shboul, Qasim M., 2002. "Best linear invariant estimators using ranked set sampling procedure: comparative study," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 97-105, March.
    9. Xinlei Wang & Ke Wang & Johan Lim, 2012. "Isotonized CDF Estimation from Judgment Poststratification Data with Empty Strata," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(1), pages 194-202, March.
    10. Frey, Jesse & Wang, Le, 2013. "Most powerful rank tests for perfect rankings," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 157-168.
    11. Cesar Augusto Taconeli & Suely Ruiz Giolo, 2020. "Maximum likelihood estimation based on ranked set sampling designs for two extensions of the Lindley distribution with uncensored and right-censored data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 1827-1851, December.
    12. A. Hussein & H. Muttlak & M. Saleh, 2013. "Group sequential comparison of two binomial proportions under ranked set sampling design," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 1169-1194, June.
    13. Jesse Frey & Timothy Feeman, 2013. "Variance estimation using judgment post-stratification," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 65(3), pages 551-569, June.
    14. Gang Zheng & Mohammad Al-Saleh, 2003. "Improving the best linear unbiased estimator for the scale parameter of symmetric distributions by using the absolute value of ranked set samples," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 253-265.
    15. Zamanzade, Elham & Parvardeh, Afshin & Asadi, Majid, 2019. "Estimation of mean residual life based on ranked set sampling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 35-55.
    16. Hassen Muttlak & Walid Al-Sabah, 2003. "Statistical quality control based on ranked set sampling," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(9), pages 1055-1078.
    17. M. Mahdizadeh & Ehsan Zamanzade, 2022. "New insights on goodness-of-fit tests for ranked set samples," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(6), pages 1777-1799, December.
    18. Zamanzade, Ehsan & Wang, Xinlei, 2017. "Estimation of population proportion for judgment post-stratification," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 257-269.
    19. Hani Samawi & Mohammed Al-Haj Ebrahem & Noha Al-Zubaidin, 2010. "An optimal sign test for one-sample bivariate location model using an alternative bivariate ranked-set sample," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 629-650.
    20. Steven N. MacEachern & Ömer Öztürk & Douglas A. Wolfe & Gregory V. Stark, 2002. "A new ranked set sample estimator of variance," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(2), pages 177-188, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aistmt:v:56:y:2004:i:4:p:701-720. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.