IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stpapr/v58y2017i4d10.1007_s00362-016-0742-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency comparisons for partially rank-ordered set sampling

Author

Listed:
  • Jesse Frey

    (Villanova University)

  • Timothy G. Feeman

    (Villanova University)

Abstract

Partially rank-ordered set sampling (PROSS) is a generalization of ranked-set sampling (RSS) in which the ranker is not required to give a full ranking in each set. In this paper, we study the efficiency of the PROSS sample mean under perfect rankings for various PROSS schemes. We obtain conditions under which one PROSS scheme is always more efficient than another, and we also obtain conditions under which how the efficiencies of two PROSS schemes compare depends on the particular distribution. We completely determine how PROSS schemes compare in the two-subset case, and we also prove a conjecture of Ozturk (Environ Ecol Stat 18:757–779, 2011) about how the efficiency of the PROSS sample mean compares to that of the RSS sample mean.

Suggested Citation

  • Jesse Frey & Timothy G. Feeman, 2017. "Efficiency comparisons for partially rank-ordered set sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1149-1163, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:58:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s00362-016-0742-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s00362-016-0742-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00362-016-0742-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00362-016-0742-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Hussein & H. Muttlak & E. Al-Sawi, 2013. "Group sequential methods based on ranked set samples," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 547-562, August.
    2. Cem Kadilar & Yesim Unyazici & Hulya Cingi, 2009. "Ratio estimator for the population mean using ranked set sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 301-309, March.
    3. Weiming Li & Tianqing Liu & Zhidong Bai, 2012. "Rounded data analysis based on ranked set sample," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 439-455, May.
    4. Steven N. MacEachern & Ömer Öztürk & Douglas A. Wolfe & Gregory V. Stark, 2002. "A new ranked set sample estimator of variance," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(2), pages 177-188, May.
    5. Timothy G. Feeman & Jesse Frey, 2016. "Efficiency bounds for a generalization of ranked-set sampling," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(3), pages 739-756, February.
    6. Gao, Jinguo & Ozturk, Omer, 2012. "Two sample distribution-free inference based on partially rank-ordered set samples," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(5), pages 876-884.
    7. Walid Abu-Dayyeh & Esam Al Sawi, 2009. "Modified inference about the mean of the exponential distribution using moving extreme ranked set sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 249-259, March.
    8. Walid Abu-Dayyeh & Aissa Assrhani & Kamarulzaman Ibrahim, 2013. "Estimation of the shape and scale parameters of Pareto distribution using ranked set sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 207-225, February.
    9. McIntyre, G.A., 2005. "A Method for Unbiased Selective Sampling, Using Ranked Sets," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 59, pages 230-232, August.
    10. Lynne Stokes, 1995. "Parametric ranked set sampling," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 47(3), pages 465-482, September.
    11. Mohammad Jafari Jozani & Saeed Majidi & François Perron, 2012. "Unbiased and almost unbiased ratio estimators of the population mean in ranked set sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 719-737, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M. Mahdizadeh & Ehsan Zamanzade, 2022. "New insights on goodness-of-fit tests for ranked set samples," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(6), pages 1777-1799, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frey, Jesse & Wang, Le, 2013. "Most powerful rank tests for perfect rankings," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 157-168.
    2. Cesar Augusto Taconeli & Suely Ruiz Giolo, 2020. "Maximum likelihood estimation based on ranked set sampling designs for two extensions of the Lindley distribution with uncensored and right-censored data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 1827-1851, December.
    3. Ehsan Zamanzade & Michael Vock, 2018. "Some nonparametric tests of perfect judgment ranking for judgment post stratification," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 1085-1100, September.
    4. Jesse Frey & Omer Ozturk, 2011. "Constrained estimation using judgment post-stratification," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 63(4), pages 769-789, August.
    5. Jesse Frey, 2012. "Constrained nonparametric estimation of the mean and the CDF using ranked-set sampling with a covariate," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 64(2), pages 439-456, April.
    6. Ehsan Zamanzade, 2019. "EDF-based tests of exponentiality in pair ranked set sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(6), pages 2141-2159, December.
    7. Wenshu Qian & Wangxue Chen & Xiaofang He, 2021. "Parameter estimation for the Pareto distribution based on ranked set sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 395-417, February.
    8. Xiaofang He & Wangxue Chen & Wenshu Qian, 2020. "Maximum likelihood estimators of the parameters of the log-logistic distribution," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(5), pages 1875-1892, October.
    9. Jesse Frey & Timothy Feeman, 2013. "Variance estimation using judgment post-stratification," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 65(3), pages 551-569, June.
    10. M. Mahdizadeh & Ehsan Zamanzade, 2022. "New insights on goodness-of-fit tests for ranked set samples," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(6), pages 1777-1799, December.
    11. Wangxue Chen & Rui Yang & Dongsen Yao & Chunxian Long, 2021. "Pareto parameters estimation using moving extremes ranked set sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 1195-1211, June.
    12. Zamanzade, Ehsan & Vock, Michael, 2015. "Variance estimation in ranked set sampling using a concomitant variable," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 1-5.
    13. Omer Ozturk & N. Balakrishnan, 2009. "Exact two-sample nonparametric test for quantile difference between two populations based on ranked set samples," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 61(1), pages 235-249, March.
    14. Naif Alotaibi & A. S. Al-Moisheer & Ibrahim Elbatal & Mansour Shrahili & Mohammed Elgarhy & Ehab M. Almetwally, 2023. "Half Logistic Inverted Nadarajah–Haghighi Distribution under Ranked Set Sampling with Applications," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-32, April.
    15. Barabesi, Lucio & El-Sharaawi, Abdel, 2001. "The efficiency of ranked set sampling for parameter estimation," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 189-199, June.
    16. Jinguo Gao & Omer Ozturk, 2017. "Rank regression in order restricted randomised designs," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 231-257, April.
    17. Sanku Dey & Mahdi Salehi & Jafar Ahmadi, 2017. "Rayleigh distribution revisited via ranked set sampling," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 75(1), pages 69-85, April.
    18. Xiaoyue Zhao & Zehua Chen, 2002. "On the Ranked-Set Sampling M-Estimates for Symmetric Location Families," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 54(3), pages 626-640, September.
    19. Nader Gemayel & Elizabeth Stasny & James Tackett & Douglas Wolfe, 2012. "Ranked set sampling: an auditing application," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 413-422, November.
    20. Mohammad Jafari Jozani & Saeed Majidi & François Perron, 2012. "Unbiased and almost unbiased ratio estimators of the population mean in ranked set sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 719-737, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:58:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s00362-016-0742-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.