IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sos/sosjrn/180305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scale and Elasticity Properties of Turkish Agricultural Production Function: Political Economy Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Deniz GÜVERCİN

Abstract

In this study, factor elasticities, value of marginal products, and the return to scale are estimated for Turkish agricultural production function by employing Turkish Regional Statistics for the period of 1994-2003. Results imply that there is an increasing return to scale, land has highest factor elasticity, and tractor has highest value of marginal product. We claim that the presence of increasing returns to scale is related to fragmented and scattered land, and small-scale farming in Turkey. Moreover, we claim that the high output and employment share of agriculture are related to populist corporatist politics. In this study, we also emphasize that reasons behind rural areas to be overpopulated are also reasons behind fragmented and small-scale farming, and sluggish movement of agricultural labor to other sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Deniz GÜVERCİN, 2018. "Scale and Elasticity Properties of Turkish Agricultural Production Function: Political Economy Approach," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 26(37).
    • Handle: RePEc:sos:sosjrn:180305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/510364
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wallace E. Huffman, 1976. "The Value of the Productive Time of Farm Wives: Iowa, North Carolina, and Oklahoma," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 58(5), pages 836-841.
    2. Hasan Dudu & Erol H. Cakmak & Nadir Ocal, 2015. "Drivers of Farm Efficiency in Turkey: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis," World Journal of Applied Economics, WERI-World Economic Research Institute, vol. 1(1), pages 45-63, June.
    3. Eric Miller, 2008. "An Assessment of CES and Cobb-Douglas Production Functions: Working Paper 2008-05," Working Papers 19992, Congressional Budget Office.
    4. Goksel Armagan & Altug Ozden & Selim Bekcioglu, 2010. "Efficiency and total factor productivity of crop production at NUTS1 level in Turkey: Malmquist index approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 573-581, April.
    5. Ozsabuncuoglu, Ismail H., 1998. "Production function for wheat: a case study of Southeastern Anatolian Project (SAP) region," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 75-87, January.
    6. Gerhard Tintner & O. H. Brownlee, 1944. "Production Functions Derived from Farm Records," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 26(3), pages 566-571.
    7. Jean-Paul Chavas & Robert G. Chambers & Rulon D. Pope, 2010. "Production Economics and Farm Management: a Century of Contributions," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 92(2), pages 356-375.
    8. Ismail H. Ozsabuncuoglu, 1998. "Production function for wheat: a case study of Southeastern Anatolian Project (SAP) region," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 18(1), pages 75-87, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jyotirmayee Kar & Mahamaya Kar, 2008. "Environment and Changing Agricultural Practices: Evidence from Orissa, India," Indus Journal of Management & Social Science (IJMSS), Department of Business Administration, vol. 2(2), pages 119-128, December.
    2. Manogna R. L. & Aswini Kumar Mishra, 2022. "Agricultural production efficiency of Indian states: Evidence from data envelopment analysis," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 4244-4255, October.
    3. Scheierling, Susanne M. & Treguer, David O. & Booker, James F. & Decker, Elisabeth, 2014. "How to assess agricultural water productivity ? looking for water in the agricultural productivity and efficiency literature," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6982, The World Bank.
    4. Gómez-Limón, José A. & Gutiérrez-Martín, Carlos & Riesgo, Laura, 2016. "Modeling at farm level: Positive Multi-Attribute Utility Programming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 17-27.
    5. Lumengo Bonga‐bonga, 2009. "The South African Aggregate Production Function: Estimation Of The Constant Elasticity Of Substitution Function," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 77(2), pages 332-349, June.
    6. François-Charles Wolff & Dale Squires & Patrice Guillotreau, 2013. "The Firm's Management in Production: Management, Firm, and Time Effects in an Indian Ocean Tuna Fishery," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 95(3), pages 547-567.
    7. Douadia Bougherara & Laurent Piet, 2018. "On the role of probability weighting on WTP for crop insurance with and without yield skewness," Working Papers hal-02790605, HAL.
    8. Molua, Ernest L., 2005. "The economics of tropical agroforestry systems: the case of agroforestry farms in Cameroon," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 199-211, February.
    9. Duquette, Eric & Higgins, Nathaniel & Horowitz, John, 2013. "Time Preference and Technology Adoption: A Single-Choice Experiment with U.S. Farmers," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150719, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Md. Jahangir Kabir & Mohammad Alauddin & Steven Crimp, 2016. "Farm-level Adaptation to Climate Change in Western Bangladesh: An Analysis of Adaptation Dynamics, Profitability and Risks," Discussion Papers Series 576, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    11. Swetlana Renner & Thomas Glauben & Heinrich Hockmann, 2014. "Measurement and decomposition of flexibility of multi-output firms," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 41(5), pages 745-773.
    12. Huiyue Diao & Majid Ghorbani, 2018. "Production risk caused by human factors: a multiple case study of thermal power plants," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27, December.
    13. Simar, Léopold & W. Wilson, Paul, 2019. "Central limit theorems and inference for sources of productivity change measured by nonparametric Malmquist indices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(2), pages 756-769.
    14. Noonan, John & Gow, Hamish, 2019. "Npr - Square Pegs And Round Holes: Can Business Schools Do Agribusiness And Farm Management?," 22nd Congress, Tasmania, Australia, March 3-8, 2019 345944, International Farm Management Association.
    15. Day, Richard H. & Sparling, Edward & Woodworth, Roger C., 1977. "PART II. Economic Optimization in Agricultural and Resource Economics," AAEA Monographs, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, number 337222, january.
    16. Boehlje, Michael & Roucan-Kane, Maud & Broring, Stefanie, 2011. "Future Agribusiness Challenges: Strategic Uncertainty, Innovation and Structural Change," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 14(5), pages 1-29, December.
    17. Özkara, Yücel & Atak, Mehmet, 2015. "Regional total-factor energy efficiency and electricity saving potential of manufacturing industry in Turkey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 495-510.
    18. MOHAJAN, Haradhan Kumar, 2021. "Estimation Of Cost Minimization Of Garments Sector By Cobb-Douglas Production Function: Bangladesh Perspective," Annals of Spiru Haret University, Economic Series, Universitatea Spiru Haret, vol. 21(2), pages 247-267.
    19. Hardaker, J. Brian, 2011. "The John L. Dillon Memorial Lecture 2010: The rise and fall of farm management as an academic discipline: an autobiographical perspective," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, October.
    20. Gallic, Ewen & Vermandel, Gauthier, 2020. "Weather shocks," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment
    • C51 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Construction and Estimation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sos:sosjrn:180305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aysen Sivrikaya (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sosyoekonomijournal.org/home.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.