IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sos/sosjrn/180110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gıda Güvencesizliğinin Bazı Belirleyicileri (Kantil Regresyon Yöntemi ve Sabit Etki Panel Yönteminin Karşılaştırılması)

Author

Listed:
  • Atilla Ahmet UĞUR
  • Demet ÖZOCAKLI

Abstract

Food security has been discussed by reports issued by the United Nations and World Bank in recent years. Food insecurity is an important topic for underdevepoled and developing countries with food shortage. In the literatüre, food insecurity/security has been investigated using different econometric methods with cross section and time series data. It seems that the studies focused on one country or a specific region of one country at the household level. The aim of this study is to identify some determinants of food security in the underdeveloped or developing 80 countries with food shortages between 2000 and 2015. Fort his purpose, Kntil Regression Method is used. While the dependent variable in the generated model is the percentage of undernutrition prevalence in place of food insecurity, independent variables; per capita real GDP calculated based on US dollars at fixed prices in 2010, defined as the net food production index containing only edible and nutritious foods, the percentage of Access to developed water resources within the food safety indicators set by FAO and the percentage of acsess to improved sanitasion facilities within the food safety indicators set by FAO. Results show that the effects of explanatory variables (per capita real GDP, net food production index, access to improved water source, accses to improved sanitation facilities) are changing on food insecurity for different quantiles (τ = 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 0.95) whereas Gaussian fixed effect estimators can only predict the avarage effect on food insecurity. It is found that strong relationship between per capita real GDP and net food prodcution index with food insecurity while it is found that weak relationship between access to improved water source and access to improved sanitation facilities with food insecurity.Classification-JEL: C21, C23, C38, E01, E23, L66Keywords: Food Insecurity, Quantile Regression Method, Fixed Effect Panel Method

Suggested Citation

  • Atilla Ahmet UĞUR & Demet ÖZOCAKLI, 2018. "Gıda Güvencesizliğinin Bazı Belirleyicileri (Kantil Regresyon Yöntemi ve Sabit Etki Panel Yönteminin Karşılaştırılması)," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 26(35).
    • Handle: RePEc:sos:sosjrn:180110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/404295
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Parente Paulo M.D.C. & Santos Silva João M.C., 2016. "Quantile Regression with Clustered Data," Journal of Econometric Methods, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Ivan A. Canay, 2011. "A simple approach to quantile regression for panel data," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 14(3), pages 368-386, October.
    3. Koenker, Roger, 2004. "Quantile regression for longitudinal data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 74-89, October.
    4. Abrevaya, Jason & Dahl, Christian M, 2008. "The Effects of Birth Inputs on Birthweight," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 26, pages 379-397.
    5. D'Souza, Anna & Jolliffe, Dean, 2011. "Food Security and Wheat Prices in Afghanistan: A Distribution-sensitive Analysis of Household-level Impacts," 2011 Annual Meeting, July 24-26, 2011, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 103443, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Sonia, Akter & Syed Abul, Basher, 2013. "The impacts of the global food and financial crises on household food security and economic well-being: evidence from Bangladesh," MPRA Paper 47859, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Rosen, Adam M., 2012. "Set identification via quantile restrictions in short panels," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 166(1), pages 127-137.
    8. Lamarche, Carlos, 2010. "Robust penalized quantile regression estimation for panel data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 157(2), pages 396-408, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Denis Chetverikov & Bradley Larsen & Christopher Palmer, 2016. "IV Quantile Regression for Group‐Level Treatments, With an Application to the Distributional Effects of Trade," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 84, pages 809-833, March.
    2. Geraci, Marco, 2019. "Modelling and estimation of nonlinear quantile regression with clustered data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 30-46.
    3. Manuel Arellano & Stéphane Bonhomme, 2016. "Nonlinear panel data estimation via quantile regressions," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 19(3), pages 61-94, October.
    4. Liang Chen & Juan J. Dolado & Jesús Gonzalo, 2021. "Quantile Factor Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(2), pages 875-910, March.
    5. David Powell, 2022. "Quantile regression with nonadditive fixed effects," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(5), pages 2675-2691, November.
    6. Maria Marino & Alessio Farcomeni, 2015. "Linear quantile regression models for longitudinal experiments: an overview," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 73(2), pages 229-247, August.
    7. Liang Chen & Yulong Huo, 2019. "A Simple Estimator for Quantile Panel Data Models Using Smoothed Quantile Regressions," Papers 1911.04729, arXiv.org.
    8. Kato, Kengo & F. Galvao, Antonio & Montes-Rojas, Gabriel V., 2012. "Asymptotics for panel quantile regression models with individual effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 170(1), pages 76-91.
    9. Harding, Matthew & Lamarche, Carlos, 2019. "A panel quantile approach to attrition bias in Big Data: Evidence from a randomized experiment," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 211(1), pages 61-82.
    10. Claudiu Tiberiu Albulescu & Matei Tămășilă & Ilie Mihai Tăucean, 2021. "The Nonlinear Relationship Between Firm Size and Growth in the Automotive Industry," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 445-463, September.
    11. Fang, Zheng & Niimi, Yoko, 2015. "Do Losses Bite More than Gains? Evidence from a Panel Quantile Regression Analysis of Subjective Well-being in Japan," AGI Working Paper Series 2015-18, Asian Growth Research Institute.
    12. Battagliola, Maria Laura & Sørensen, Helle & Tolver, Anders & Staicu, Ana-Maria, 2022. "A bias-adjusted estimator in quantile regression for clustered data," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 165-186.
    13. Georges Bresson & Guy Lacroix & Mohammad Arshad Rahman, 2021. "Bayesian panel quantile regression for binary outcomes with correlated random effects: an application on crime recidivism in Canada," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 227-259, January.
    14. Galvao, Antonio F. & Kato, Kengo, 2016. "Smoothed quantile regression for panel data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 193(1), pages 92-112.
    15. Cooke, Edgar F. A., 2012. "Is the impact of AGOA heterogeneous?," MPRA Paper 43277, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Harding, Matthew & Lamarche, Carlos, 2014. "Estimating and testing a quantile regression model with interactive effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 178(P1), pages 101-113.
    17. Philip Kostov & Julie Le Gallo, 2015. "Convergence: A Story of Quantiles and Spillovers," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(4), pages 552-576, November.
    18. Matthew Harding & Carlos Lamarche, 2017. "Penalized Quantile Regression with Semiparametric Correlated Effects: An Application with Heterogeneous Preferences," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(2), pages 342-358, March.
    19. Sherrilyn Billger & Carlos Lamarche, 2015. "A panel data quantile regression analysis of the immigrant earnings distribution in the United Kingdom and United States," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 705-750, September.
    20. repec:prg:jnlpep:v:preprint:id:646:p:1-21 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Jorge Eduardo Camusso & Ana Inés Navarro, 2021. "Asymmetries in aggregate income risk over the business cycle: evidence from administrative data of Argentina," Asociación Argentina de Economía Política: Working Papers 4447, Asociación Argentina de Economía Política.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    food insecurity; quantile regression method; fixed effect panel method;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models
    • C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • C38 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Classification Methdos; Cluster Analysis; Principal Components; Factor Analysis
    • E01 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General - - - Measurement and Data on National Income and Product Accounts and Wealth; Environmental Accounts
    • E23 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Production

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sos:sosjrn:180110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aysen Sivrikaya (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sosyoekonomijournal.org/home.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.