IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/snh/journl/v3y2018i2p80-93.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teorías organizacionales: un modelo teórico para mejorar el desempeño administrativo

Author

Listed:
  • Said Arath Corrales Villegas

    (Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora)

Abstract

El presente trabajo tiene como objetivo presentar un modelo administrativo para emplear teorizaciones científicas en las empresas, como resultado de una revisión teórica de las teorías organizacionales enfocadas a la optimización de las organizaciones, mismas que mantienen su origen a partir de la revolución industrial, desde aquellas enfocadas de forma general a las empresas y su mejoramiento, hasta aquellas orientadas a la planificación de un rubro en específico a largo plazo. Esto, como consecuencia del requerimiento para las organizaciones a la maximización de su productividad, marcado por el acelerado desarrollo económico y expansión de mercados, resultando en el inicio de las teorías administrativas, para mejorar la eficiencia tanto de trabajadores como de la organización en su totalidad, sentando las bases en la Administración científica de Taylor (1911) y Clásica de Fayol (1916), las cuales inician con la estructuración y sistematización de actividades, dan origen a una teorización que pretende entender a plenitud a las organizaciones y elevar su productividad.

Suggested Citation

  • Said Arath Corrales Villegas, 2018. "Teorías organizacionales: un modelo teórico para mejorar el desempeño administrativo," Revista de Investigación en Ciencias Contables y Administrativas, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Facultad de Contaduría y Ciencias Administrativas, vol. 3(2), pages 80-93, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:snh:journl:v:3:y:2018:i:2:p:80-93
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ricca.umich.mx/index.php/ricca/article/view/45/69
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy W. Ruefli & James M. Collins & Joseph R. Lacugna, 1999. "Risk measures in strategic management research: auld lang syne?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 167-194, February.
    2. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    3. Henry Mintzberg, 1978. "Patterns in Strategy Formation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(9), pages 934-948, May.
    4. Taylor, Frederick Winslow, 1911. "The Principles of Scientific Management," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number taylor1911.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hoe Chin Goi & Jiro Kokuryo, 2016. "Design of a University-Based Venture Gestation Program (UVGP)," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(01), pages 1-35, March.
    2. Peters, Matt D. & Wieder, Bernhard & Sutton, Steve G. & Wakefield, James, 2016. "Business intelligence systems use in performance measurement capabilities: Implications for enhanced competitive advantage," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 1-17.
    3. François Therin, 2003. "Learning-based Strategy, Toward a New Model of Strategic Behaviour," Post-Print hal-00451450, HAL.
    4. Mehmet Ali Köseoglu & John A. Parnell & Melissa Yan Yee Yick, 2021. "Identifying influential studies and maturity level in intellectual structure of fields: evidence from strategic management," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1271-1309, February.
    5. Robert S. Huckman & Bradley R. Staats, 2008. "Variation in Experience and Team Familiarity: Addressing the Knowledge Acquisition-Application Problem," Harvard Business School Working Papers 09-035, Harvard Business School.
    6. João José M. Ferreira & Cristina I. Fernandes & Vanessa Ratten, 2016. "A co-citation bibliometric analysis of strategic management research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(1), pages 1-32, October.
    7. Daniel Geiger & Jochen Koch, 2008. "Von der individuellen Routine zur organisationalen Praktik — Ein neues Paradigma für die Organisationsforschung?," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 60(7), pages 693-712, November.
    8. Miguel Pina e Cunha, 2005. "Bricolage in organizations," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp474, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.
    9. Steven Toms, 2010. "Value, profit and risk: accounting and the resource‐based view of the firm," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(5), pages 647-670, June.
    10. Michael J. Leiblein & Jeffrey J. Reuer & Todd Zenger, 2018. "What Makes a Decision Strategic?," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 558-573, December.
    11. Yu, Jiang & Liu, Rui & Chen, Feng, 2020. "Linking institutional environment with technological change: The rise of China's flat panel display industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    12. Pascal Le Masson & Armand Hatchuel & Mario Le Glatin & Benoit Weil, 2018. "Designing Decisions In The Unknown: Towards A Generative Decision Model For Management Science," Post-Print hal-01937103, HAL.
    13. Markus Gmür, 2003. "Co-citation analysis and the search for invisible colleges: A methodological evaluation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 57(1), pages 27-57, January.
    14. Müller-Stewens,, 2016. "Das Strategische Management als Disziplin – Meilensteine und Perspektiven seiner Entwicklung," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 70(4), pages 322-343.
    15. Eero Vaara & Juha-Antti Lamberg, 2016. "Taking historical embeddedness seriously : Three historical approaches to advance strategy process and practice research," Post-Print hal-02276732, HAL.
    16. zu Knyphausen-Aufsess, Dodo & Bickhoff, Nils & Bieger, Thomas, 2006. "Understanding and breaking the rules of business: Toward a systematic four-step process," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 49(5), pages 369-377.
    17. Yolande E. Chan & James S. Denford & Joyce Y. Jin, 2016. "Competing Through Knowledge and Information Systems Strategies: A Study of Small and Medium-Sized Firms," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(03), pages 1-37, September.
    18. George Halkos & Nickolaos Tzeremes, 2010. "The effect of foreign ownership on SMEs performance: An efficiency analysis perspective," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 167-180, October.
    19. Jochen Nürk, 2019. "Dynamic Alignment of Digital Supply Chain Business Models," European Journal of Business Science and Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics, vol. 5(1), pages 41-82.
    20. Uta Wilkens & Daniela Menzel & Peter Pawlowsky, 2004. "Inside the Black-box: Analysing the Generation of Core Competencies and Dynamic Capabilities by Exploring Collective Minds. An Oganisational Learning Perspective," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 15(1), pages 8-26.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:snh:journl:v:3:y:2018:i:2:p:80-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/famicmx.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.