IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sls/ipmsls/v45y20233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Critical Juncture: Assessing Canada's Productivity Performance and Future Prospects

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Rosell
  • Kaleigh Dowsett
  • Nelson Paterson

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that Canada has faced long-standing issues with productivity growth, both in comparison to its past performance and relative to other advanced economies. Additionally, it is recognized that as the transformation brought on by population aging continues, improvements in the living standards of Canadians will increasingly depend on productivity growth. This situation arises at a time when Canada, along with the global economy, is at the forefront of major structural transformations, including the green transition, the realignment of global trade, and the increasing digitization and use of AI. The necessity to adapt to the scale and scope of these transformations will create pressures for all economic actors to make renewed efforts to address Canada’s longstanding productivity challenges. To better understand the direction of Canada’s future productivity growth, this article chronicles Canada's productivity growth over recent decades and highlights key structural factors that have likely constrained Canada’s productivity performance. We then explore how these factors might shape the trajectory of productivity growth in the context of these impending structural transformations and identify areas where further research should be prioritized.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Rosell & Kaleigh Dowsett & Nelson Paterson, 2023. "A Critical Juncture: Assessing Canada's Productivity Performance and Future Prospects," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 45, pages 61-92, Fall.
  • Handle: RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:45:y:2023:3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.csls.ca/ipm/45/IPM_45_Rossel.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Lanoie & Michel Patry & Richard Lajeunesse, 2008. "Environmental regulation and productivity: testing the porter hypothesis," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 121-128, October.
    2. Jay Stewart, 2022. "Why was Labor Productivity Growth So High during the COVID-19 Pandemic? The Role of Labor Composition," Economic Working Papers 545, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
    3. Nicholas Bloom & Benn Eifert & Aprajit Mahajan & David McKenzie & John Roberts, 2013. "Does Management Matter? Evidence from India," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 128(1), pages 1-51.
    4. Dan Andrews & Chiara Criscuolo & Peter N. Gal, 2015. "Frontier Firms, Technology Diffusion and Public Policy: Micro Evidence from OECD Countries," OECD Productivity Working Papers 2, OECD Publishing.
    5. Lutz, Eva & Bender, Marko & Achleitner, Ann-Kristin & Kaserer, Christoph, 2013. "Importance of spatial proximity between venture capital investors and investees in Germany," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(11), pages 2346-2354.
    6. Marshall Reinsdorf, 2015. "Measuring Industry Contributions to Labour Productivity Change: A New Formula in a Chained Fisher Index Framework," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 28, pages 3-26, Spring.
    7. Aled ab Iorwerth & Carlos Rosell, 2018. "The Gains from More Competitive Regulation Settings in Canada," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 34, pages 3-20, Spring.
    8. Jay Stewart, 2022. "Why Was US Labour Productivity Growth So High During the COVID-19 Pandemic? The Role of Labour Composition," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 42, pages 87-103, Spring.
    9. Takeo Hoshi, 2006. "Economics Of The Living Dead," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 57(1), pages 30-49, March.
    10. Mr. Jorge A Alvarez & Mr. Ivo Krznar & Trevor Tombe, 2019. "Internal Trade in Canada: Case for Liberalization," IMF Working Papers 2019/158, International Monetary Fund.
    11. Jianmin Tang & Weimin Wang, 2020. "Industry Productivity Performance in G7 Countries after the Global Financial Crisis: A Canadian Perspective," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 39, pages 33-52, Fall.
    12. Yvan Guillemette & David Turner, 2021. "The long game: Fiscal outlooks to 2060 underline need for structural reform," OECD Economic Policy Papers 29, OECD Publishing.
    13. Charles Bérubé & Marc Duhamel & Daniel Ershov, 2012. "Market Incentives for Business Innovation: Results from Canada," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 47-65, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Serdar Kabaca & Kerem Tuzcuoglu, 2023. "Supply Drivers of US Inflation Since the COVID-19 Pandemic," Staff Working Papers 23-19, Bank of Canada.
    2. Alexander Murray, 2017. "What Explains the Post-2004 U.S.Productivity Slowdown?," CSLS Research Reports 2017-05, Centre for the Study of Living Standards.
    3. Guillaume Cléaud & Francisco de Castro Fernández & Jorge Durán Laguna & Lucia Granelli & Martin Hallet & Anne Jaubertie & Carlos Maravall Rodriguez & Diana Ognyanova & Balazs Palvolgyi & Tsvetan Tsali, 2019. "Cruising at Different Speeds: Similarities and Divergences between the German and the French Economies," European Economy - Discussion Papers 103, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    4. González-Uribe, Juanita & Reyes, Santiago, 2021. "Identifying and boosting “Gazelles”: Evidence from business accelerators," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 260-287.
    5. Reyes, Germán, 2024. "Coarse Wage-Setting and Behavioral Firms," IZA Discussion Papers 17039, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Ayyagari, Meghana & Demirguc-Kunt, Asli & Maksimovic, Vojislav, 2014. "Does local financial development matter for firm lifecycle in India ?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7008, The World Bank.
    7. Kariem Soliman, 2021. "Are Industrial Robots a new GPT? A Panel Study of Nine European Countries with Capital and Quality-adjusted Industrial Robots as Drivers of Labour Productivity Growth," EIIW Discussion paper disbei307, Universitätsbibliothek Wuppertal, University Library.
    8. Cette, Gilbert & Corde, Simon & Lecat, Rémy, 2018. "Firm-level productivity dispersion and convergence," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 76-78.
    9. Farrukh Iqbal & Aadil Nakhoda, 2024. "Determinants of Management Practices among Manufacturing Firms in Pakistan (Article)," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 63(1), pages 45-64.
    10. Ufuk Akcigit & Douglas Hanley & Stefanie Stantcheva, 2022. "Optimal Taxation and R&D Policies," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(2), pages 645-684, March.
    11. Diane Coyle & Jen‐Chung Mei, 2023. "Diagnosing the UK productivity slowdown: which sectors matter and why?," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 90(359), pages 813-850, July.
    12. V. Vandenberghe, 2018. "The Contribution of Educated Workers to Firms’ Efficiency Gains: The Key Role of Proximity to the ‘Local’ Frontier," De Economist, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 259-283, September.
    13. Miriam Bruhn & Dean Karlan & Antoinette Schoar, 2018. "The Impact of Consulting Services on Small and Medium Enterprises: Evidence from a Randomized Trial in Mexico," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 126(2), pages 635-687.
    14. Laura Alfaro & Nick Bloom & Paola Conconi & Harald Fadinger & Patrick Legros & Andrew F Newman & Raffaella Sadun & John Van Reenen, 2024. "Come Together: Firm Boundaries and Delegation," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 22(1), pages 34-72.
    15. Miklós Koren & Krisztina Orbán, 2023. "The Macroeconomics of Managers:Supply, Selection, and Competition," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 2329, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    16. Nicholas Bloom & Luis Garicano & Raffaella Sadun & John Van Reenen, 2014. "The Distinct Effects of Information Technology and Communication Technology on Firm Organization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(12), pages 2859-2885, December.
    17. Hazhir Rahmandad & Nelson Repenning, 2016. "Capability erosion dynamics," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 649-672, April.
    18. Javier Papa & Luke Rehill & Brendan O'Connor, 2021. "Patterns of Firm-Level Productivity in Ireland," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 52(3), pages 241-268.
    19. Na Zhang & Jinqian Deng & Fayyaz Ahmad & Muhammad Umar Draz & Nabila Abid, 2023. "The dynamic association between public environmental demands, government environmental governance, and green technology innovation in China: evidence from panel VAR model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 9851-9875, September.
    20. Pang, Jiaren & Zhang, Xinyi & Zhou, Xi, 2020. "From classroom to boardroom: The value of academic independent directors in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:45:y:2023:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CSLS (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cslssca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.