IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sdb/social/v7y2018i1p56-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of the Innovative Capital on the Security of the National Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Boris Coretchi

    (IRIM)

Abstract

In this scientific paper, we will touch the theoretical and methodological aspects of economic security as a major problem of the evolution of the national economy. The concept of economic security is of paramount importance thanks to different dimensions, major differences between the realities that characterize it, the purpose and the context in which the evaluation is made, as well as the difference of perception of the social reality. As a result of our quantifying the level of economic security and its impact on the evolution of the national economy of the Republic of Moldova, we will identify the economic and social problems of the country and the ways of minimizing them.

Suggested Citation

  • Boris Coretchi, 2018. "Impact of the Innovative Capital on the Security of the National Economy," Social-Economic Debates, Association for Entreprenorial Spirit Promotion, vol. 7(1), pages 56-63, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sdb:social:v:7:y:2018:i:1:p:56-63
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.economic-debates.ro/Art%208%20Boris%20DSE%20II-2018.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.economic-debates.ro/Art%208%20Boris%20DSE%20II-2018.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Buzan, Barry, 1984. "Economic structure and international security: the limits of the liberal Case," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(4), pages 597-624, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maryam Asghari & Elham Oliagard, 2017. "Trade and National Security: A Test for Best-Known Hypothesis," Iranian Economic Review (IER), Faculty of Economics,University of Tehran.Tehran,Iran, vol. 21(2), pages 403-431, Spring.
    2. Emilie M. Hafner-Burton & Alexander H. Montgomery, 2012. "War, Trade, and Distrust: Why Trade Agreements Don’t Always Keep the Peace," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 29(3), pages 257-278, July.
    3. Rogelio Madrueño-Aguilar, 2016. "Human Security and the New Global Threats: Discourse, Taxonomy and Implications," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 7(2), pages 156-173, May.
    4. David H. Bearce & Eric O'N. Fisher, 2002. "Economic Geography, Trade, and War," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 46(3), pages 365-393, June.
    5. Han, Xia & Lukoianove, Tatiana & Zhao, Shasha & Liu, Xiaohui, 2024. "International relations in international business research: A review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    6. Hauwah K. K. Abdulkareem & Sodiq Olaiwola Jimoh & Ebenezer Olubiyi, 2023. "Trade–peace conundrum in Africa: The moderating effects of poverty and inequality," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 35(4), pages 323-335, December.
    7. Jacklyne Achieng' Aput & Anita Ndoti Kiamba & Peter Kagwanja, 2023. "Public Diplomacy in Regional Integration: Strategizing Policy Goals," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(10), pages 368-384, October.
    8. Edward D. Mansfield & Brian M. Pollins, 2001. "The Study of Interdependence and Conflict," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 45(6), pages 834-859, December.
    9. Reuveny Rafael, 2000. "The Trade and Conflict Debate: A Survey of Theory, Evidence and Future Research," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 23-49, January.
    10. Lee, Yusin, 2017. "Interdependence, issue importance, and the 2009 Russia-Ukraine gas conflict," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 199-209.
    11. Sergio Cesaratto, 2010. "Europe, German Mercantilism and the Current Crisis," Department of Economics University of Siena 595, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    12. Mau, Steffen & Kamlage, Jan-Hendrik & Kathmann, Till & Wrobel, Sonja, 2007. "Staatlichkeit, Territorialgrenzen und Personenmobilität," TranState Working Papers 51, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    13. Corneliu MUNTEANU, 2018. "Evaluation Of The Level Of Moldova’S Economic Security In The Process Of European Integration," EURINT, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 5, pages 182-198.
    14. Håvard Hegre, 2005. "Development and the Liberal Peace," Nordic Journal of Political Economy, Nordic Journal of Political Economy, vol. 31, pages 17-46.
    15. Jacklyne Aput & Dr. Anita Kiamba & Prof. Peter Kagwanja, 2022. "An assessment of the nexus between ethno-politics and public diplomacy in Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(9), pages 487-495, September.
    16. Faruk Balli & Hatice Ozer Balli & Mudassar Hasan & Russell Gregory-Allen, 2022. "Geopolitical risk spillovers and its determinants," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 68(2), pages 463-500, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economic growth; economic security; human capital; innovational capital; innovations;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O40 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sdb:social:v:7:y:2018:i:1:p:56-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adi Sava (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.economic-debates.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.