IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/voprob/2019i3p101-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Академическое мошенничество студентов: учебная мотивация vs образовательная среда

Author

Abstract

Шмелева Евгения Дмитриевна - младший научный сотрудник Центра социологии высшего образования Института образования Национального исследовательского университета "Высшая школа экономики". E-mail: eshmeleva@hse.ruСеменова Татьяна Вадимовна - младший научный сотрудник Центра социологии высшего образования Института образования Национального исследовательского университета "Высшая школа экономики". E-mail: tsemenova@hse.ruАдрес: 101000, Москва, ул. Мясницкая, 20.Академическое мошенничество студентов часто связывают с низким уровнем учебной мотивации, что подтверждается рядом зарубежных и отечественных исследований. Однако роль учебной мотивации может быть переоценена, поскольку в таких исследованиях, как правило, не контролируются характеристики образовательной среды - поведение преподавателей и одногруппников. Проведено исследование с опорой на теоретическую рамку Э.Андермана и Т.Мердок при выделении факторов академического мошенничества и на теорию самодетерминации Э. Диси и Р. Райана для измерения учебной мотивации. На основе лонгитюдных данных о студентах четырех российских вузов - участников Проекта "5-100" (N= 914) оценивается вклад учебной мотивации в объяснение частоты списывания и обращения к плагиату при контроле характеристик образовательной среды. Результаты регрессионного анализа показывают, что, если учитывать вероятность последствий от академического мошенничества и нечестность одногруппников, учебная мотивация перестает играть значимую роль как предиктор академического мошенничества. Основным предиктором и плагиата, и списывания выступает представление о честности среды - о том, насколько распространены эти практики среди одногруппников. В отличие от списывания, плагиат не зависит от вероятности наказания со стороны преподавателей.

Suggested Citation

  • Шмелева Е. Д. & Семенова Т. В., 2019. "Академическое мошенничество студентов: учебная мотивация vs образовательная среда," Вопросы образования // Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 3, pages 101-129.
    • Handle: RePEc:scn:voprob:2019:i:3:p:101-129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://vo.hse.ru/data/2019/11/12/1534194992/04%20Shmeleva.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evgeniia Shmeleva, 2015. "Academic Dishonesty in Modern Universities: A Review of Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Findings," Journal of Economic Sociology, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 16(2), pages 55-79.
    2. Jan R. Magnus & Victor M. Polterovich & Dmitri L. Danilov & Alexei V. Savvateev, 2002. "Tolerance of Cheating: An Analysis Across Countries," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 125-135, June.
    3. Natalia Maloshonok & Tatiana Semenova & Evgeniy Terentev, 2015. "Academic Motivation among Students of Russian Higher Education Establishments: Introspection," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 3, pages 92-121.
    4. Evgeniy Terentev & Ivan Gruzdev & Elena Gorbunova, 2015. "The Court Is Now in Session: Professor Discourse on Student Attrition," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 129-151.
    5. Denisova-Schmidt, Elena & Huber, Martin & Leontyeva, Elvira, 2016. "On the development of students’ attitudes towards corruption and cheating in Russian universities," FSES Working Papers 467, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Freiburg/Fribourg Switzerland.
    6. Donald L. McCabe & Linda Klebe Trevino & Kenneth D. Butterfield, 2001. "Dishonesty in Academic Environments," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(1), pages 29-45, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evgeniia Shmeleva & Tatiana Semenova, 2019. "Academic Dishonesty among College Students: Academic Motivation vs Contextual Factors," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 3, pages 101-129.
    2. Alessandro Bucciol & Simona Cicognani & Natalia Montinari, 2017. "Cheating in Academia: The Relevance of Social Factors," Working Papers 15/2017, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    3. A. Yudanov & O. Pyrkina & E. Bekker., 2016. "On the limits of unsolvability of the "free rider problem"," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 11.
    4. Togara Warinda, 2017. "Academic Dishonesty: Prior perceptions and behaviour on cheating of Bachelor of Accountancy Freshmen at a Zimbabwean university," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 8(6), pages 82-93.
    5. Irina Shcheglova & Yulia Koreshnikova & Olga Parshina, 2019. "The Role of Engagement in the Development of Critical Thinking in Undergraduates," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 264-289.
    6. Giorgio Gulino & Federico Masera, 2023. "Contagious Dishonesty: Corruption Scandals and Supermarket Theft," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(4), pages 218-251, October.
    7. Helen Klein & Nancy Levenburg & Marie McKendall & William Mothersell, 2007. "Cheating During the College Years: How do Business School Students Compare?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 72(2), pages 197-206, May.
    8. Serguei MIKHAILITCHENKO, 2017. "Economic structure of educational process and its implications for the higher education reform," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(1(610), S), pages 69-82, Spring.
    9. Borisova, Ekaterina & Peresetsky, Anatoly, 2016. "Do secrets come out? Statistical evaluation of student cheating," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 44, pages 119-130.
    10. César Martinelli & Susan W. Parker & Ana Cristina Pérez-Gea & Rodimiro Rodrigo, 2018. "Cheating and Incentives: Learning from a Policy Experiment," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 10(1), pages 298-325, February.
    11. Maria de Fátima Rocha & Aurora A.C. Teixeira, 2005. "College cheating in Portugal: results from a large scale survey," FEP Working Papers 197, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    12. Щеглова И. А. & Корешникова Ю. Н. & Паршина О. А., 2019. "Роль Студенческой Вовлеченности В Развитии Критического Мышления," Вопросы образования // Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 264-289.
    13. Polterovich, Victor, 2017. "Positive collaboration: Factors and mechanisms of evolution," Russian Journal of Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 24-41.
    14. Michał Krawczyk, 2012. "Sex, morals and exam cheating," Working Papers 2012-09, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    15. Auzan, A., 2017. "Strategy-2035: Preliminary Hypotheses," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 35(3), pages 185-192.
    16. Brent J. Davis & Tarek Jaber‐Lopez, 2023. "Do voluntary commitment mechanisms improve welfare? The effect of mandatory and voluntary oaths in a social dilemma," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(2), pages 525-540, April.
    17. Kevin L. Eastman & Jacqueline K. Eastman & Rajesh Iyer, 2008. "Academic Dishonesty: An Exploratory Study Examining Whether Insurance Students Are Different From Other College Students," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 11(1), pages 209-226, March.
    18. Osipian, Ararat, 2008. "Corruption of the Politicized University: Lessons from the Orange Revolution in Ukraine," MPRA Paper 11312, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. David Pascual-Ezama & Derek Dunfield & Beatriz Gil-Gómez de Liaño & Drazen Prelec, 2015. "Peer Effects in Unethical Behavior: Standing or Reputation?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    20. Dench, Daniel & Joyce, Theodore, 2022. "Information and credible sanctions in curbing online cheating among undergraduates: A field experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 408-427.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:voprob:2019:i:3:p:101-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marta Morozova (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://vo.hse.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.