IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/mngsci/y2017i3p59-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Реализация инновационного потенциала государственных закупок в России // Innovative Potential Implementation of Public Procurement in Russia

Author

Listed:
  • N. Sirotkina G.

    (Public Administration Department, National Research University Higher School of Economics)

  • НАДЕЖДА Сироткина ГЕННАДЬЕВНА

    (Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»)

Abstract

Public procurement is widely used for encouraging the innovative activity in developed countries, meanwhile in Russia innovative procurement is not used systematically which updates the urgency of the research. The systematization of innovative activity stimulation mechanisms in the domestic system of public procurements is performed in the article. The analysis of these mechanisms’ practice of using allowed revealing a large number of the barriers which do not allow using the possibilities of the state order in forming the demand for innovative products. Such barriers are the drastic antimonopoly and anti-corruption norms interfering to use the flexible specifications and qualitative criteria for applications evaluation, the limited usage of “life-cycle cost” criterion, and also the absence of need’s long-term planning in the domestic public procurement system for innovative production. The result of the research is a conclusion about the need of transition from fragmentary measures of innovations support to strategy development of encouraging the demand for innovations, and not only in system of public procurements, but also in the sphere of the companies purchases with the state participation and infrastructure monopolies. Использование государственных закупок для активизации инновационной деятельности - широко распространенная в развитых странах практика, однако в России инновационные государственные закупки пока не носят системного характера, что актуализирует тему исследования. В статье осуществлена систематизация механизмов стимулирования инновационной активности в отечественной системе государственных закупок. Анализ практики использования указанных механизмов позволил выявить большое количество барьеров, не позволяющих использовать возможности государственного заказа при формировании спроса на инновационную продукцию. К таким барьерам относятся жесткие антимонопольные и антикоррупционные нормы, препятствующие использованию гибких спецификаций и нестоимостных критериев оценки заявок, ограниченное использование критерия «стоимость жизненного цикла», а также отсутствие в отечественной системе государственных закупок механизмов долгосрочного планирования потребности в инновационной продукции. Результатом исследования является вывод о необходимости перехода от фрагментарных мер поддержки инноваций к разработке стратегии стимулирования спроса на инновации, причем не только в системе закупок для государственных нужд, но и в сфере закупок компаний с государственным участием и инфраструктурных монополий.

Suggested Citation

  • N. Sirotkina G. & НАДЕЖДА Сироткина ГЕННАДЬЕВНА, 2017. "Реализация инновационного потенциала государственных закупок в России // Innovative Potential Implementation of Public Procurement in Russia," Управленческие науки // Management Science, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 7(3), pages 59-67.
    • Handle: RePEc:scn:mngsci:y:2017:i:3:p:59-67
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://managementscience.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/116/117.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles Edquist & Nicholas S Vonortas & Jon M Zabala-Iturriagagoitia & Jakob Edler (ed.), 2015. "Public Procurement for Innovation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15642.
    2. Edquist, Charles & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, Jon Mikel, 2012. "Public Procurement for Innovation as mission-oriented innovation policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 1757-1769.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edquist , Charles & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia , Jon Mikel, 2015. "The Innovation Union Scoreboard is flawed: The Case of Sweden – not the innovation leader of the EU – updated version," Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/27, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    2. Krieger, Bastian & Zipperer, Vera, 2022. "Does green public procurement trigger environmental innovations?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(6).
    3. Martin Warland, 2016. "What kinds of regional innovation systems occur around federal agencies?," Diskussionsschriften credresearchpaper10, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft - CRED.
    4. Paolo Castelnuovo & Stefano Clo & Massimo Florio, 2021. "Space policy drives innovation through technological procurement: evidence from Italy," Working Papers - Economics wp2021_08.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    5. Castelnovo, Paolo & Florio, Massimo & Forte, Stefano & Rossi, Lucio & Sirtori, Emanuela, 2018. "The economic impact of technological procurement for large-scale research infrastructures: Evidence from the Large Hadron Collider at CERN," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(9), pages 1853-1867.
    6. Wesseling , Joeri H., 2015. "Explaining differences in electric vehicle policies across countries: innovation vs. environmental policy rationale," Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/42, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    7. Castelnovo, Paolo & Clò, Stefano & Florio, Massimo, 2023. "A quasi-experimental design to assess the innovative impact of public procurement: An application to the Italian space industry," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    8. Caloghirou, Yannis & Protogerou, Aimilia & Panagiotopoulos, Panagiotis, 2016. "Public procurement for innovation: A novel eGovernment services scheme in Greek local authorities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 1-10.
    9. Massimo Florio & Francesco Giffoni & Anna Giunta & Emanuela Sirtori, 2018. "Big science, learning, and innovation: evidence from CERN procurement," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(5), pages 915-936.
    10. Dirk Czarnitzki & Paul Hünermund & Nima Moshgbar, 2018. "Public procurement as policy instrument for innovation," Working Papers of Department of Management, Strategy and Innovation, Leuven 606259, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Management, Strategy and Innovation, Leuven.
    11. Paolo Castelnovo & Martina Dal Molin, 2021. "The learning mechanisms through public procurement for innovation: The case of government‐funded basic research organizations," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(3), pages 411-446, September.
    12. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Hünermund, Paul & Moshgbar, Nima, 2020. "Public Procurement of Innovation: Evidence from a German Legislative Reform," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    13. Julien Chicot & Mireille Matt, 2018. "Public procurement of innovation: a review of rationales, designs, and contributions to grand challenges," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(4), pages 480-492.
    14. Elisabetta Iossa & Federico Biagi & Paola Valbonesi, 2018. "Pre-commercial procurement, procurement of innovative solutions and innovation partnerships in the EU: rationale and strategy," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(8), pages 730-749, November.
    15. Edquist, Charles & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, Jon Mikel, 2020. "Functional procurement for innovation, welfare and the environment," Papers in Innovation Studies 2020/1, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research, revised 19 Jul 2020.
    16. Raymond Stokke & Xinlu Qiu & Magnus Sparrevik & Shannon Truloff & Iselin Borge & Luitzen Boer, 2023. "Procurement for zero-emission construction sites: a comparative study of four European cities," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 72-86, March.
    17. Wesseling , Joeri H. & Edquist, Charles, 2016. "Public procurement for innovation: lessons from the procurement of a navigable storm surge barrier," Papers in Innovation Studies 2016/5, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    18. Paolo CASTELNOVO & Massimo FLORIO, 2019. "Mission-oriented Public Organizations for Knowledge Creation," Departmental Working Papers 2019-09, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    19. Edquist , Charles, 2015. "Innovation-related Public Procurement as a Demand-oriented Innovation Policy Instrument," Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/28, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    20. Elvira Uyarra & Kieron Flanagan & Edurne Magro & Jon Mikel Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, 2017. "Anchoring the innovation impacts of public procurement to place: The role of conversations," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(5), pages 828-848, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:mngsci:y:2017:i:3:p:59-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://managementscience.elpub.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.