IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/financ/y2018i6p6-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Особенности российской модели экономического роста // Specific features of the Russian Economic Growth Model

Author

Listed:
  • I. Bukina S.

    (Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences.)

  • P. Orekhovsky A.

    (Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences)

  • И. Букина С.

    (Институт экономики Российской академии наук.)

  • П. Ореховский А.

    (Институт экономики Российской академии наук)

Abstract

The article presents the study of the specific features of the Russian economic growth in 1998–2017. The study objective is to substantiate the growth and decline mechanism in business activity in the Russian economy. This mechanism is determined by the gap in the growth rates of wages and labor productivity in the open economy. Four hypotheses have been formulated: 1) significant cause and effect relationship between exchange rate and economic growth in Russia; 2) wage growth outrunning productivity has a depressing effect on the profitability of the commercial sector; 3) significant differences between the Russian economic growth in 1998–2009 and in 2009–2017, determined by the connection between the excess of the domestic interest rate over the world rate and investments; 4) substantial connection between the domestic interest rate and investment in 1998–2009 which disappeared in 2009–2017. The theoretical analysis and the hypotheses have been based on neoclassical synthesis models. Statistical testing of the hypotheses has been carried out by means of statistical and correlation analysis and methods of econometric analysis of time series. A problem related to wage growth outrunning labor productivity has been identified. Probable significant changes in the Russian growth model in 2018–2020 have been forecasted. They will be caused by the infrastructure development and housing construction. The major conclusion of the study is that there will be a positive effect of the ruble depreciation on labor productivity in the medium term. However, it will be over by the end of 2019 and beginning of 2020. Domestic currency strengthening and outrunning wage growth with the slowing labor productivity reduce the profitability of the commercial sector and put brakes on the economic growth. В работе рассматривается специфика российского экономического роста в период 1998–2017 гг. Цель исследования — обоснование механизма подъема и спада деловой активности в российской экономике, определяющегося разрывом темпов роста заработной платы и производительности труда в условиях открытой экономики. Сформулированы 4 гипотезы: 1) между валютным курсом и экономическим ростом в России есть существенная причинно-следственная связь; 2) опережение роста оплаты труда над производительностью угнетающе влияет на рентабельность коммерческого сектора; 3) в характере российского экономического роста в периоды 1998–2009 гг. и 2009–2017 гг. имеются существенные различия, обусловленные связью между превышением внутренней процентной ставки над мировой и инвестициями; 4) в первом периоде (1998–2009 гг.) наблюдается существенная связь между отечественной процентной ставкой и инвестициями, во втором периоде (2009–2017 гг.) такая взаимосвязь исчезает. Теоретический анализ и постановка гипотез основываются на моделях неоклассического синтеза. Статистическая проверка гипотез осуществлялась посредством статистического и корреляционного анализа, а также методов эконометрического анализа временных рядов. Выявлена проблема, связанная с опережением роста оплаты труда и доходов над ростом производительности труда. Сделан вывод о вероятных существенных изменениях российской модели роста в 2018–2020 гг. Они будут обусловлены развитием инфраструктуры и жилищного строительства. Основной вывод исследования: в среднесрочном периоде будет наблюдаться позитивный эффект обесценения рубля на производительность труда. Однако к концу 2019 — началу 2020 г. он будет исчерпан. Укрепление отечественной валюты и опережающий рост заработной платы на фоне замедления динамики производительности труда снижают рентабельность коммерческого сектора и тормозят экономический рост.

Suggested Citation

  • I. Bukina S. & P. Orekhovsky A. & И. Букина С. & П. Ореховский А., 2018. "Особенности российской модели экономического роста // Specific features of the Russian Economic Growth Model," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 22(6), pages 6-24.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2018:i:6:p:6-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://financetp.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/774/522.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brunner, Karl & Meltzer, Allan H., 1976. "The Phillips curve," Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Milan Nikolic, 2002. "Russia and the IMF: Pseudo Lending for Pseudo Reforms," UCL SSEES Economics and Business working paper series 6, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES).
    3. Lucas, Robert Jr, 1976. "Econometric policy evaluation: A critique," Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 19-46, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yariv, Leeat & Jackson, Matthew O., 2018. "The Non-Existence of Representative Agents," CEPR Discussion Papers 13397, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Hendry, David F. & Clements, Michael P., 2003. "Economic forecasting: some lessons from recent research," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 301-329, March.
    3. J.P.G. Reijnders, 2007. "Impulse or propagation? How the tides turned in Business Cycle Theory," Working Papers 07-07, Utrecht School of Economics.
    4. Poterba, James M. & Summers, Lawrence H., 1983. "Dividend taxes, corporate investment, and `Q'," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 135-167, November.
    5. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2007_032 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Elvio Accinelli & Juan Gabriel Brida, 2007. "Modelos económicos con múltiples regímenes," Revista de Administración, Finanzas y Economía (Journal of Management, Finance and Economics), Tecnológico de Monterrey, Campus Ciudad de México, vol. 1(2), pages 96-115.
    7. Mulder, C.B., 1986. "Testing Korteweg's rational expectations model for a small open economy," Other publications TiSEM c52e6c80-834d-49c7-ae6a-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Bentour, El Mostafa, 2013. "Oil Prices, Drought Periods and Growth Forecasts in Morocco," MPRA Paper 52892, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Tryphon Kollintzas, 1986. "Tax Policy under Nongeometric Physical Depreciation," Public Finance Review, , vol. 14(3), pages 263-288, July.
    10. He, Yong, 2018. "Can the visible and invisible hands coexist in land pricing?," MPRA Paper 88770, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Michael R. Darby, 1983. "International Transmission of Monetary and Fiscal Shocks under Pegged and Floating Exchange Rates: Simulation Experiments," NBER Chapters, in: The International Transmission of Inflation, pages 162-231, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Lozej, Matija & Rannenberg, Ansgar, 2017. "The macroeconomic effects of the regulatory LTV and LTI ratios in the Central Bank of Ireland's DSGE model," Economic Letters 04/EL/17, Central Bank of Ireland.
    13. Thomas J. Sargent, 1982. "The Ends of Four Big Inflations," NBER Chapters, in: Inflation: Causes and Effects, pages 41-98, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Bruno Frey, 2011. "Tullock challenges: happiness, revolutions, and democracy," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 148(3), pages 269-281, September.
    15. Jun, Bogang & Kim, Tai-Yoo, 2015. "A neo-Schumpeterian perspective on the analytical macroeconomic framework: The expanded reproduction system," Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences 11-2015, University of Hohenheim, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences.
    16. Juan Manuel Larrosa, 2016. "Agentes computacionales y análisis económico," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 18(34), pages 87-113, January-J.
    17. Cathy Yi-Hsuan Chen & Thomas C. Chiang, 2017. "Surprises, sentiments, and the expectations hypothesis of the term structure of interest rates," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 1-28, July.
    18. Peter J. Buckley & Jeremy Clegg & Nicolas Forsans & Kevin T. Reilly, 2010. "A Simple and Flexible Dynamic Approach to Foreign Direct Investment Growth: The Canada-United States Relationship in the Context of Free Trade," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Foreign Direct Investment, China and the World Economy, chapter 17, pages 386-418, Palgrave Macmillan.
    19. Thomas I. Palley, 2013. "Horizontalists, verticalists, and structuralists: the theory of endogenous money reassessed," Review of Keynesian Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 1(4), pages 406—424-4, OCT.
    20. Malick Souare, 2003. "Macroeconomic Implications of Population Aging and Public Pensions," Social and Economic Dimensions of an Aging Population Research Papers 100, McMaster University.
    21. Starck, Christian, 1991. "Specifying a Bayesian vector autoregression for short-run macroeconomic forecasting with an application to Finland," Research Discussion Papers 4/1991, Bank of Finland.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2018:i:6:p:6-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://financetp.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.