IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/financ/y2016i2p22-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Государственная Под Держка Развития Моногородов России И Казахстана // Government Support Of Single-Industry Towns In Russia And Kazakhstan

Author

Listed:
  • I. Turgel D.

    (Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

  • L. Bozhko L.

    (Rudny Industrial Institute)

  • Linshui Xu

    (Harbin University of Commerce)

  • И. Тургель Д.

    (Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы)

  • Л. Божко Л.

    (Рудненский индустриальный институт)

  • Линьши Сюй

    (Харбинский университет коммерции)

Abstract

The article discusses the results of research aimed at conducting the comparative analysis of implementation of the state policy for support of single-industry towns in Russia and Kazakhstan, the identification of specific and common problems as well as methods for solving them. The study reveals the stages in the development of support policy, analyzes the evolution of criteria used for selection of single-industry towns needed support, and considers factors that led to criteria refinement.The study provides a comparison of Russian and Kazakh single-industry towns in terms of their spatial localization, industry specialization, social and economic situation, population number.It is stressed that the key differences in the approaches to the development of single-industry towns in the countries are linked to the scale of support and degree of its selectivity, institutionalization characteristics, and coordination with national priorities.The authors describe key problems arising when implementing policy for support of single-industry towns in Russia and Kazakhstan and conclude that it is necessary to overcome the limitations of traditional approaches to urban policy implementation in conditions of negative economic dynamics. В статье представлены результаты исследования, цель которого -проведение сравнительного анализа опыта реализации государственной политики поддержки моногородов в России и Казахстане, выявление специфических и общих проблем, а также методов их решения. В ходе исследования выявлены этапы развития государственной политики поддержки моногородов, проанализирована эволюция критериев выделения моногородов с целью государственной поддержки, обоснованы факторы, обусловившие данные изменения. Проведено сравнение систем моногородов России и Казахстана с точки зрения их пространственной локализации, отраслевой специализации, социально-экономической ситуации, численности населения. Подчеркивается, что ключевые различия в подходах к развитию моногородов в данных странах связаны с масштабами оказываемой поддержки, степенью ее селективности, спецификой институционализации, степенью координации с общегосударственными приоритетами. Формулируются ключевые проблемы реализации политики поддержки моногородов в России и Казахстане, делаются выводы о необходимости преодоления ограниченности традиционных подходов к осуществлению городской политики в условиях негативной экономической динамики.

Suggested Citation

  • I. Turgel D. & L. Bozhko L. & Linshui Xu & И. Тургель Д. & Л. Божко Л. & Линьши Сюй, 2016. "Государственная Под Держка Развития Моногородов России И Казахстана // Government Support Of Single-Industry Towns In Russia And Kazakhstan," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 20(2), pages 22-32.
    • Handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2016:i:2:p:22-32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://financetp.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/386/313.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Justin B. Hollander & Jeremy Németh, 2011. "The bounds of smart decline: a foundational theory for planning shrinking cities," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 349-367, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenshi Yang & Fan Chen & Qianqian Wei & Zhenwei Peng, 2024. "Relationships between Resident Activities and Physical Space in Shrinking Cities in China—The Case of Chaoyang City," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Prener, Chris & Braswell, Taylor & Monti, Daniel J., 2018. "St. Louis's "Urban Prairie": Vacant Land and the Potential for Revitalization," SocArXiv bc7eh, Center for Open Science.
    3. Ruiying Liu, 2022. "Long-Term Development Perspectives in the Slow Crisis of Shrinkage: Strategies of Coping and Exiting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-30, August.
    4. Iwona Kantor-Pietraga, 2021. "Does One Decade of Urban Policy for the Shrinking City Make Visible Progress in Urban Re-Urbanization? A Case Study of Bytom, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Shangkun Yu & Ruili Wang & Xuejie Zhang & Yi Miao & Chengxin Wang, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of Urban Shrinkage and Its Impact on Urban Resilience in Three Provinces of Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Bin Du & Ying Wang & Jiaxin He & Wai Li & Xiaohong Chen, 2021. "Spatio-Temporal Characteristics and Obstacle Factors of the Urban-Rural Integration of China’s Shrinking Cities in the Context of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Roemer, Kelli F. & Haggerty, Julia H., 2021. "Coal communities and the U.S. energy transition: A policy corridors assessment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    8. Min Wang & Shuqi Yang & Huajie Gao & Kahaer Abudu, 2021. "The Characteristics, Influencing Factors, and Push-Pull Mechanism of Shrinking Counties: A Case Study of Shandong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    9. Zhenshan Yang, 2019. "Sustainability of Urban Development with Population Decline in Different Policy Scenarios: A Case Study of Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Fang Liu & Weilun Sun & Ge Peng, 2022. "Demographic Spatialization Simulation under the Active “Organic Decentralization Population” Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-21, October.
    11. Jaekyung Lee & Galen Newman & Yunmi Park, 2018. "A Comparison of Vacancy Dynamics between Growing and Shrinking Cities Using the Land Transformation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    12. Yuanping Wang & Mu Lin & Jingxin Gao & Zhaoyin Zhou, 2021. "Fading Attraction of the Shrinking City: An Empirical Study from an Urban Resource Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Rachel S. Franklin, 2021. "The demographic burden of population loss in US cities, 2000–2010," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 209-230, April.
    14. Xiao, Huijuan & Duan, Zhiyuan & Zhou, Ya & Zhang, Ning & Shan, Yuli & Lin, Xiyan & Liu, Guosheng, 2019. "CO2 emission patterns in shrinking and growing cities: A case study of Northeast China and the Yangtze River Delta," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Shouzhong Zhang & Limin Wang & Xiangli Wu, 2022. "Population Shrinkage, Public Service Levels, and Heterogeneity in Resource-Based Cities: Case Study of 112 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, November.
    16. Yuanzhen Song & Jian Tian & Weijie He & Aihemaiti Namaiti & Jian Zeng, 2024. "Differential Analysis of Carbon Emissions between Growing and Shrinking Cities: A Case of Three Northeastern Provinces in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-23, May.
    17. Kai Zhou & Jaroslav Koutský & Justin B. Hollander, 2022. "URBAN SHRINKAGE IN CHINA, THE USA AND THE CZECH REPUBLIC: A Comparative Multilevel Governance Perspective," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 480-496, May.
    18. Wangchongyu Peng & Weijun Gao & Xin Yuan & Rui Wang & Jinming Jiang, 2019. "Spatiotemporal Differences in Determinants of City Shrinkage Based on Semiparametric Geographically Weighted Regression," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-17, December.
    19. Bernt, Matthias, 2017. "„Keine unklugen Leute“. Die Durchsetzung des „Stadtumbau Ost“," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 5(1/2), pages 41-60.
    20. David McCollum & Hebe Nicholson & Paula Duffy, 2021. "A place-based approach to population sustainability: Demographic and economic change at the local level in Fife, Scotland," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(6), pages 505-523, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2016:i:2:p:22-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://financetp.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.