IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scm/ejafbu/v15y2021i25p1-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biological Assets Accounting In The Agricultural Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Monica Laura ZLATI

    (Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, 720229, Romania)

  • Cristian MIRICA

    (Universitatea Dunărea de jos Galați, Romania)

Abstract

Biological assets are a basic renewable resource for the agricultural sector. Due to their complex nature and transformation of their structure or destination over time, the recognition and accounting treatment of biological assets is a challenge for small agricultural entities due to the limited nature of the business and due to the disclosure of assets required by current accounting. The paper aims are to approach by empirical methods the casuistry of biological assets from an accounting perspective and to present a dashboard for adequate accounting procedures in the case of biological assets. The article is useful to economic entities in the agricultural sector, bringing to light the latest practices regarding accounting approach for biological assets by reference to the international IAS / IFRS standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Monica Laura ZLATI & Cristian MIRICA, 2021. "Biological Assets Accounting In The Agricultural Sector," European Journal of Accounting, Finance & Business, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania - Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, West University of Timisoara, Romania - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 15(25), pages 1-7, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:scm:ejafbu:v:15:y:2021:i:25:p:1-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://accounting-management.ro/getpdf.php?paperid=25_2
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Viorel Lefter & Aureliana Geta Roman, 2007. "IAS 41 Agriculture: Fair Value Accounting," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 5(5(510)), pages 15-22, May.
    2. Siti Nuryanah & Sardar M. N. Islam, 2015. "The Context of the Case Study," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Corporate Governance and Financial Management, chapter 5, pages 145-156, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Liliana FELEAGĂ & Niculae FELEAGĂ & Vasile RĂILEANU, 2012. "Theoretical considerations about implementation of IAS 41 in Romania," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(2(567)), pages 31-38, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saverio BOZZOLAN & Enrico LAGHI & Marco MATTEI, 2016. "Amendments to the IAS 41 and IAS 16 - implications for accounting of bearer plants," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(4), pages 160-166.
    2. Carmenta, Rachel & Cammelli, Federico & Dressler, Wolfram & Verbicaro, Camila & Zaehringer, Julie G., 2021. "Between a rock and a hard place: The burdens of uncontrolled fire for smallholders across the tropics," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    3. Dai, Jiangyu & Wu, Shiqiang & Han, Guoyi & Weinberg, Josh & Xie, Xinghua & Wu, Xiufeng & Song, Xingqiang & Jia, Benyou & Xue, Wanyun & Yang, Qianqian, 2018. "Water-energy nexus: A review of methods and tools for macro-assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 393-408.
    4. Anne Ventura & Van‐Loc Ta & Tristan Senga Kiessé & Stéphanie Bonnet, 2021. "Design of concrete : Setting a new basis for improving both durability and environmental performance," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(1), pages 233-247, February.
    5. Boris Rumanko & Zuzana Lušňáková & Monika Moravanská & Mária Šajbidorová, 2021. "Succession as a Risk Process in the Survival of a Family Business—Case of Slovakia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Kong, Ling & Wang, Dongbo, 2020. "Comparison of citations and attention of cover and non-cover papers," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(4).
    7. Ionel Bostan & Ionela-Corina Chersan & Magdalena Danileț & Mihaela Ifrim & Viorica Chirilă, 2020. "Investigations Regarding the Linguistic Register Used by Managers to Convey to Stakeholders a Positive View of Their Company, in the Context of the Business Sustainability Desideratum," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Raymond B. Frempong & David Stadelmann, 2017. "Does Female Education have a Bargaining Effect on Household Welfare? Evidence from Ghana and Uganda," CREMA Working Paper Series 2017-08, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    9. BATCA-DUMITRU Corina-Graziella & ILINCUTA Lucian-Dorel & HURLOIU Lacramioara-Rodica & RUSU Bianca-Florentina, 2020. "Case Studies And Examples Of The Accounting Treatment Prescribed For Biological Assets And Agricultural Products By Ias 41 Agriculture," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 77-96, June.
    10. Michela Floris & Angela Dettori & Cinzia Dessi, 2021. "Handling Innovation in Small Family Firms: The Role of Context," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(5), pages 1-60, July.
    11. Lechenet, Martin & Makowski, David & Py, Guillaume & Munier-Jolain, Nicolas, 2016. "Profiling farming management strategies with contrasting pesticide use in France," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 40-53.
    12. Lawrence Collins Kihamaiso Mwebesa & Catherine Kansiime & Benon B. Asiimwe & Paddy Mugambe & Innocent B. Rwego, 2018. "The Effect of Financial Record Keeping on Financial Performance of Development Groups in Rural Areas of Western Uganda," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(4), pages 136-145, April.
    13. Fathi Maurits Muhamada & Erna Harnawati & Satria Yudhia Wijaya, 2021. "Accounting treatment analysis of agricultural activities in presenting financial statements based on PSAK 69 IN PT IJ," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(4), pages 255-263, June.
    14. Mariusz Adynkiewicz-Piragas & Bartłomiej Miszuk, 2020. "Risk Analysis Related to Impact of Climate Change on Water Resources and Hydropower Production in the Lusatian Neisse River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-23, June.
    15. Apantri Peungnumsai & Apichon Witayangkurn & Masahiko Nagai & Hiroyuki Miyazaki, 2018. "A Taxi Zoning Analysis Using Large-Scale Probe Data: A Case Study for Metropolitan Bangkok," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 21-45, June.
    16. Gabriela MOTOI, 2020. "The Challenges And Opportunities Of Green Economy And Green Jobs.From A Global To A European Approach," Social Sciences and Education Research Review, Department of Communication, Journalism and Education Sciences, University of Craiova, vol. 7(2), pages 195-205, December.
    17. Alam, Mohammad Faiz & Pavelic, Paul, 2020. "Underground Transfer of Floods for Irrigation (UTFI): exploring potential at the global scale," IWMI Research Reports H050008, International Water Management Institute.
    18. Oris Tom-Lawyer & Michael Thomas, 2020. "Re-examining the Status of the English Language in Anglophone Western Africa: A Comparative Study of Ghana and Nigeria," English Linguistics Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(4), pages 6-22, December.
    19. Van Vooren, Laura & Reubens, Bert & Broekx, Steven & Pardon, Paul & Reheul, Dirk & van Winsen, Frankwin & Verheyen, Kris & Wauters, Erwin & Lauwers, Ludwig, 2016. "Greening and producing: An economic assessment framework for integrating trees in cropping systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 44-57.
    20. Henrieta Pavolová & Tomáš Bakalár & Elsanosi Mohamed Abdelhafiez Emhemed & Zuzana Hajduová & Martin Pafčo, 2019. "Model of sustainable regional development with implementation of brownfield areas," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(3), pages 1088-1100, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scm:ejafbu:v:15:y:2021:i:25:p:1-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Liviu Scutariu The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Liviu Scutariu to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feusvro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.