IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v10y2021i4p255-263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting treatment analysis of agricultural activities in presenting financial statements based on PSAK 69 IN PT IJ

Author

Listed:
  • Fathi Maurits Muhamada

    (Economics and Business, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Jl. RS Fatmawati No.1 Pondok Labu, Jakarta Selatan, 12450, Jakarta, Indonesia)

  • Erna Harnawati

    (Economics and Business, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Jl. RS Fatmawati No.1 Pondok Labu, Jakarta Selatan, 12450, Jakarta, Indonesia)

  • Satria Yudhia Wijaya

    (Economics and Business, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Jl. RS Fatmawati No.1 Pondok Labu, Jakarta Selatan, 12450, Jakarta, Indonesia)

Abstract

Agricultural activity is a type of operational activity carried out by an entity to manage biological transformation and harvested biological assets to be sold or converted into agricultural products. In biological transformation, measurement is needed, which shows the value of a biological asset in fair value with the entity's economic benefits. PSAK 69 concerning agriculture has been approved by the Indonesian Financial Accounting Standards Board (DSAK IAI), and its implementation becomes effective as of 1 January 2018. PSAK 69 Agriculture regulates the accounting treatment and disclosures related to agricultural activities. This research was conducted to determine the accounting treatment of agricultural activities and the implementation of PSAK 69 to PT IJ, which is one of the entities whose business activities are engaged in the exploitation of industrial plantations. This study used qualitative research methods with interpretive paradigms and ethnomethodology approaches. Data analysis techniques were used at the time of data collection in observations, interviews with informants, and collecting documents in financial statements supporting data research. Based on the research conducted, the discussion results signify that the accounting treatment of agricultural activities at PT IJ in recognition, measurement, recording, presentation, and disclosure is in accordance with PSAK 69 concerning agriculture. Key Words:Accounting Treatment; Agricultural Activities; and PSAK 69

Suggested Citation

  • Fathi Maurits Muhamada & Erna Harnawati & Satria Yudhia Wijaya, 2021. "Accounting treatment analysis of agricultural activities in presenting financial statements based on PSAK 69 IN PT IJ," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(4), pages 255-263, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:255-263
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v10i4.1227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/1227/903
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i4.1227
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i4.1227?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raco, Jozef, 2010. "Metode penelitian kualitatif: jenis, karakteristik dan keunggulannya," OSF Preprints mfzuj, Center for Open Science.
    2. Liliana FELEAGĂ & Niculae FELEAGĂ & Vasile RĂILEANU, 2012. "Theoretical considerations about implementation of IAS 41 in Romania," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(2(567)), pages 31-38, February.
    3. Rute Gonçalves & Patrícia Lopes, 2015. "Accounting in Agriculture: Measurement practices of listed firms," FEP Working Papers 557, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pangihutan Panjaitan & Jonni Mahroza & Pujo Widodo, 2020. "Indonesia Defense Diplomacy: Papua's Problem Perspective," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 6(1), pages 142-155, April.
    2. Patrik Svoboda & Hana Bohušová, 2017. "Amendments to IAS 16 and IAS 41: Are There Any Differences between Plant and Animal from a Financial Reporting Point of View?," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 65(1), pages 327-337.
    3. Monica Laura ZLATI & Cristian MIRICA, 2021. "Biological Assets Accounting In The Agricultural Sector," European Journal of Accounting, Finance & Business, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania - Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, West University of Timisoara, Romania - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 15(25), pages 1-7, February.
    4. Georgiana Burlacu & Ioan-Bogdan Robu & Ionela Munteanu, 2024. "Exploring the Influence of Earnings Management on the Value Relevance of Financial Statements: Evidence from the Bucharest Stock Exchange," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Saverio BOZZOLAN & Enrico LAGHI & Marco MATTEI, 2016. "Amendments to the IAS 41 and IAS 16 - implications for accounting of bearer plants," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(4), pages 160-166.
    6. Camelia-Cătălina M1HALCIUC, 2020. "The Role Of Agriculture In The Romanian Economy," European Journal of Accounting, Finance & Business, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania - Faculty of Economics and Public Administration, West University of Timisoara, Romania - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 14(24), pages 139-145, October.
    7. H Hamdan & I Wayan Ruspendi Junaedi & I Gusti Bagus Rai Utama, 2020. "The Changes in Business Culture after the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesian Perspective," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 13(1), pages 80-89, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:255-263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.