IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v33y2019i3p500-517.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Defence is the Best Offence: Horizontal Disintegration and Institutional Completion in the German Coordinated Market Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Markus Hertwig

    (Chemnitz University of Technology, Germany)

  • Johannes Kirsch

    (University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany)

  • Carsten Wirth

    (Darmstadt University of Applied Sciences, Germany)

Abstract

The article considers how (new) forms of horizontal disintegration, like onsite subcontracting, challenge and change the industrial relations institutions of the German coordinated market economy (CME). Focusing on firm-level co-determination practices, it analyses how works councils respond to strategies of onsite subcontracting and what effects their responses have for the employment system. Based on evidence from 12 case studies, it is argued that although onsite subcontracting might prompt institutional erosion, this does not pass uncontested. Rather, practices of network-oriented employee representation on the part of works councils might bring about an ‘institutional completion’, in this case, the institutionalisation of the network as an additional point of reference for employee representation. This may stabilise and even extend the scope of existing CME institutions through a process of ‘institutional upgrading’. In some areas of the economy, however, management and works council practices are more likely to exacerbate dualisation and social inequality.

Suggested Citation

  • Markus Hertwig & Johannes Kirsch & Carsten Wirth, 2019. "Defence is the Best Offence: Horizontal Disintegration and Institutional Completion in the German Coordinated Market Economy," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 33(3), pages 500-517, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:33:y:2019:i:3:p:500-517
    DOI: 10.1177/0950017018772765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017018772765
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0950017018772765?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:33:y:2019:i:3:p:500-517. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.