IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v28y2014i4p651-662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global labour governance: potential and limits of an emerging perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Guglielmo Meardi

    (University of Warwick, UK)

  • Paul Marginson

    (University of Warwick, UK)

Abstract

The article addresses the meaning and relevance of the recently emerged idea of ‘global labour governance’. Increasingly influential in policy, it has been criticized for political and theoretical reasons, including the risk of normative ideological uses. The article suggests that labour studies should nonetheless engage, theoretically and empirically, with the issue and the perspective of ‘global labour governance’. This is because of its growing political importance and for the attention it brings to still understudied issues of ‘multi-level’ dynamics, ‘networks’ and ‘reflexivity’. Systematic analysis of governance alternatives is needed. The traditions of the sociology of work and industrial relations can contribute to this analysis through their elaboration on informality, sectoral differences and collective action, as well as by problematizing the idea of ‘effectiveness’.

Suggested Citation

  • Guglielmo Meardi & Paul Marginson, 2014. "Global labour governance: potential and limits of an emerging perspective," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 28(4), pages 651-662, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:28:y:2014:i:4:p:651-662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wes.sagepub.com/content/28/4/651.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feuerstein, Patrick & Herrigel, Gary, 2017. "The limits of global labor governance and an emerging perspective," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 18(2), pages 6-15.
    2. Jimmy Donaghey & Juliane Reinecke, 2018. "When Industrial Democracy Meets Corporate Social Responsibility — A Comparison of the Bangladesh Accord and Alliance as Responses to the Rana Plaza Disaster," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 56(1), pages 14-42, March.
    3. Barbara Bechter & Bernd Brandl & Thomas Prosser, 2017. "Engagement in European social dialogue: an investigation into the role of social partner structural capacity," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 365-382, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:28:y:2014:i:4:p:651-662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.