IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v23y2009i3p561-570.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

WERS the validity? a critique of the 2004 Workplace Employment Relations Survey of employees

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew R. Timming

    (University of Manchestern, Andrew.timming@mbs.ac.uk)

Abstract

The Workplace Employment Relations Survey series is a tremendously useful source of data for industrial relations researchers. But, like all large-scale secondary datasets, it has a number of structural design problems. These have not been articulated previously in much depth. Looking at the 2004 instalment of the series, this article aims to offer a critical appraisal of the survey of employees. The structure of the questionnaire and the validity of the items are critiqued. Recommendations are offered for the next edition of the Workplace Employment Relations Survey.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew R. Timming, 2009. "WERS the validity? a critique of the 2004 Workplace Employment Relations Survey of employees," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 23(3), pages 561-570, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:23:y:2009:i:3:p:561-570
    DOI: 10.1177/0950017009337070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017009337070
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0950017009337070?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Marginson, 1998. "The Survey Tradition in British Industrial Relations Research: an Assessment of the Contribution of Large-Scale Workplace and Enterprise Surveys," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 36(3), pages 361-388, September.
    2. Riccardo Peccei & Helen Bewley & Howard Gospel & Paul Willman, 2008. "Look Who's Talking: Sources of Variation in Information Disclosure in the UK," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 46(2), pages 340-366, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William Brown & Simon Deakin & David Nash & Sarah Oxenbridge, 2000. "The Employment Contract: From Collective Procedures to Individual Rights," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 38(4), pages 611-629, December.
    2. Sergio Salis & Allan M. Williams, 2010. "Knowledge Sharing through Face‐to‐Face Communication and Labour Productivity: Evidence from British Workplaces," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 48(2), pages 436-459, June.
    3. Chu-Mei Liu & Chieh-Peng Lin, 2018. "Assessing the effects of responsible leadership and ethical conflict on behavioral intention," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 1003-1024, October.
    4. Loris Guery & Anne Stévenot, 2017. "L’actionnariat salarié favorise-t-il la diffusion d’information aux salariés et leur participation aux décisions stratégiques ? Une question de gouvernance d’entreprise," Post-Print hal-02500129, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:23:y:2009:i:3:p:561-570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.