IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v21y2007i1p67-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legal obligation or personal lottery?

Author

Listed:
  • Deborah Foster

    (University of Cardiff)

Abstract

This article ‘gives voice’ to disabled employees by documenting their experiences of negotiating workplace adjustments under the terms of the UK's Disability Discrimination Act, 1995.This ad hoc process of ‘negotiation’ is explored through in-depth interviews that reveal persistent problems with the character of legislation and its implementation in public sector organizations. Negotiations on adjustments were characteristically highly individualized and outcomes almost entirely contingent upon the knowledge, attitudes and goodwill of poorly trained line managers. The adjustment process itself often led to instances of bullying by managers, resulting in stress and ill health among employees.An analysis of managers' behaviour in the context of wider debates on power and organizational decision-making concludes that, even where outcomes are positive for employees, managers still choose to abdicate responsibility in this area. Such behaviour represents a form of non-decision-making that is essentially political in character and has wider implications for equality agendas.

Suggested Citation

  • Deborah Foster, 2007. "Legal obligation or personal lottery?," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 21(1), pages 67-84, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:21:y:2007:i:1:p:67-84
    DOI: 10.1177/0950017007073616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017007073616
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0950017007073616?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hazel Mawdsley & Duncan Lewis, 2017. "Lean and mean: how NPM facilitates the bullying of UK employees with long-term health conditions," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(5), pages 317-324, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:21:y:2007:i:1:p:67-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.