IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v58y2021i11p2310-2328.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of mobile policies in coalition building: The Barcelona model as coalition magnet in Buenos Aires and Rio de Janeiro (1989–1996)

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriel Silvestre

    (University of Sheffield, UK)

  • Guillermo Jajamovich

    (University of Buenos Aires, Argentina)

Abstract

Research on policy mobility has tended to focus on what moves (e.g. policy models, templates) and who moves them (e.g. consultants, international organisations), with less attention paid to the relational politics of grounding dominant ideas in local policymaking. The ‘demand side’ at the end of the mobilisation process (e.g. local authorities and policy actors) is usually depicted as passive or as having stable interests. This assumption is problematic as it can reinforce taken-for-granted power asymmetries in the flow of urban policy ideas, particularly in cases where cities in the Global North are presented as ‘exporting sites’ for a Global South audience of ‘importing sites’. Drawing on the concept of policy ideas as ‘coalition magnets’ from policy studies, this article demonstrates how local policies are relationally produced by cosmopolitan policy actors on the ‘demand side’ who strategically mobilise circulating ideas as a tool for coalition building. We provide a relational comparative study of Buenos Aires and Rio de Janeiro’s policy processes and urban outcomes in mobilising the Barcelona model of urban regeneration and strategic planning, drawing on evidence from interviews, document analysis and the biographies of key policy actors. We demonstrate the strategic importance of mobile policies for emerging political actors who employ them as a ‘coalition magnet’ to build support for their governments.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriel Silvestre & Guillermo Jajamovich, 2021. "The role of mobile policies in coalition building: The Barcelona model as coalition magnet in Buenos Aires and Rio de Janeiro (1989–1996)," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(11), pages 2310-2328, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:58:y:2021:i:11:p:2310-2328
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098020939808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098020939808
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098020939808?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jennifer Robinson, 2011. "Cities in a World of Cities: The Comparative Gesture," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Kevin Ward, 2006. "‘Policies in Motion’, Urban Management and State Restructuring: The Trans‐Local Expansion of Business Improvement Districts," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 54-75, March.
    3. Cristina Temenos & Tom Baker, 2015. "Enriching Urban Policy Mobilities Research," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 841-843, July.
    4. Jane M. Jacobs & Loretta Lees, 2013. "Defensible Space on the Move: Revisiting the Urban Geography of Alice Coleman," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 1559-1583, September.
    5. Tim Bunnell & Rita Padawangi & Eric C. Thompson, 2018. "The politics of learning from a small city: Solo as translocal model and political launch pad," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(8), pages 1065-1074, August.
    6. Cristina Temenos & Eugene McCann, 2012. "The Local Politics of Policy Mobility: Learning, Persuasion, and the Production of a Municipal Sustainability Fix," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(6), pages 1389-1406, June.
    7. Stephen V. Ward, 2013. "Cities as planning models," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 295-313, January.
    8. Astrid Wood, 2015. "Multiple Temporalities of Policy Circulation: Gradual, Repetitive and Delayed Processes of BRT Adoption in South African Cities," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 568-580, May.
    9. Andrew Harris & Susan Moore, 2013. "Planning Histories and Practices of Circulating Urban Knowledge," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 1499-1509, September.
    10. Allan Cochrane & Kevin Ward, 2012. "Researching the Geographies of Policy Mobility: Confronting the Methodological Challenges," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(1), pages 5-12, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ryan Anders Whitney & David López-García, 2023. "Fast-track institutionalization: The opening of urban planning best practice agencies in Mexico City," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(3), pages 600-616, May.
    2. Francesca Blanc & Giancarlo Cotella, 2023. "Global urban development frameworks landing in Latin America: Insights from Ecuador and Bolivia," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(1), January.
    3. Ryan Anders Whitney, 2022. "FROM HERE, THERE, AND EVERYWHERE: English‐language Media Outlets and Urban Planning Best Practices in the Global South," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 466-479, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Enora Robin & Laura Nkula-Wenz, 2021. "Beyond the success/failure of travelling urban models: Exploring the politics of time and performance in Cape Town’s East City," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(6), pages 1252-1273, September.
    2. Ian R. Cook & Stephen V. Ward & Kevin Ward, 2014. "A Springtime Journey to the Soviet Union: Postwar Planning and Policy Mobilities through the Iron Curtain," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 805-822, May.
    3. Keavy McFadden & Robin Wright, 2023. "Social reproduction and public finance: A comparative study of TIF in California and Chicago," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(8), pages 2108-2127, November.
    4. Tim Bunnell, 2015. "Antecedent Cities and Inter-referencing Effects: Learning from and Extending Beyond Critiques of Neoliberalisation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(11), pages 1983-2000, August.
    5. Rachel Bok, 2015. "Airports on the move? The policy mobilities of Singapore Changi Airport at home and abroad," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(14), pages 2724-2740, November.
    6. CP Pow, 2018. "Constructing authority: Embodied expertise, homegrown neoliberalism, and the globalization of Singapore’s private planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(6), pages 1209-1227, September.
    7. I-Chun Catherine Chang, 2017. "Failure matters: Reassembling eco-urbanism in a globalizing China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(8), pages 1719-1742, August.
    8. Astrid Wood, 2016. "Tracing policy movements: Methods for studying learning and policy circulation," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(2), pages 391-406, February.
    9. Lucrecia Bertelli, 2021. "What kind of global city? Circulating policies for ‘slum’ upgrading in the making of world-class Buenos Aires," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(6), pages 1293-1313, September.
    10. Bertelli, Lucrecia, 2021. "What kind of global city? Circulating policies for ‘slum’ upgrading in the making of world-class Buenos Aires," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 109311, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Lachlan Barber, 2014. "(Re)Making Heritage Policy in Hong Kong: A Relational Politics of Global Knowledge and Local Innovation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(6), pages 1179-1195, May.
    12. Emma Colven, 2020. "Thinking beyond success and failure: Dutch water expertise and friction in postcolonial Jakarta," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(6), pages 961-979, September.
    13. Mayra Mosciaro & Alvaro Pereira, 2019. "Reinforcing uneven development: The financialisation of Brazilian urban redevelopment projects," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(10), pages 2160-2178, August.
    14. Hamedinger Alexander, 2014. "The Mobility and/or Fixity of Urban and Planning Policies – The Role of Divergent Urban Planning Cultures," European Spatial Research and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 21(1), pages 1-15, May.
    15. Tom Baker & Cristina Temenos, 2015. "Urban Policy Mobilities Research: Introduction to a Debate," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 824-827, July.
    16. Cristina Temenos & Tom Baker, 2015. "Enriching Urban Policy Mobilities Research," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 841-843, July.
    17. Sergio Montero & Gianpaolo Baiocchi, 2022. "A posteriori comparisons, repeated instances and urban policy mobilities: What ‘best practices’ leave behind," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(8), pages 1536-1555, June.
    18. Ryan Anders Whitney, 2022. "FROM HERE, THERE, AND EVERYWHERE: English‐language Media Outlets and Urban Planning Best Practices in the Global South," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 466-479, May.
    19. Anthony M Levenda, 2019. "Mobilizing smart grid experiments: Policy mobilities and urban energy governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(4), pages 634-651, June.
    20. Colin McFarlane, 2012. "The Entrepreneurial Slum: Civil Society, Mobility and the Co-production of Urban Development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(13), pages 2795-2816, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:58:y:2021:i:11:p:2310-2328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.