IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v55y2018i13p2803-2820.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mechanisms of property ownership change and social change in inner-city Warsaw (Poland)

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena GórczyÅ„ska

Abstract

Taking a production-side approach, the article discusses how property restitution and privatisation have created rent and value gaps, and influenced social change in the inner city of Warsaw (Poland). Specifically, a rent gap (resulting from restitution) and a value gap (created by low-cost privatisation) are hypothesised to have produced different ownership structures in pre-war residential buildings, with different implications for social change. These effects are assumed to be modulated by three factors: legal constraints, availability of private capital and changing residential preferences. The main findings show that the national legislation and municipal regulations with respect to low cost privatisation created the value gap and favoured intergenerational property transfer and lower residential mobility. The value gap has been eliminated by the changes in municipal regulations. Second, a lack of private capital was a key element in disinvestment in the 1990s, and private developers have since become key actors in shaping the housing offer and have triggered intensive gentrification. Third, residential choices often follow family reasons (inheritance of a unit), and are loosely coupled with a ‘back to the city’ movement. The contemporary choices of many newcomers are still embedded in opportunities created by earlier privatisation. Finally, former municipal tenants in restituted buildings come under pressure from new, private owners to leave their homes. Paradoxically, restitution, seen as a mechanism for social justice, has led to social injustice. Overall, it appears that both privatisation and restitution have fuelled problems of affordability, and led to the exclusion of lower-income households from the housing market.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena GórczyÅ„ska, 2018. "Mechanisms of property ownership change and social change in inner-city Warsaw (Poland)," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(13), pages 2803-2820, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:55:y:2018:i:13:p:2803-2820
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098017730006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098017730006
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098017730006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Willem R. Boterman & Wouter P.C. Gent, 2014. "Housing Liberalisation and Gentrification: The Social Effects of Tenure Conversions in Amsterdam," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 105(2), pages 140-160, April.
    2. Martin Lux & Anneli Kährik & Petr Sunega, 2012. "Housing Restitution and Privatisation: Both Catalysts and Obstacles to the Formation of Private Rental Housing in the Czech Republic and Estonia," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 137-158.
    3. Justin Kadi & Richard Ronald, 2014. "Market-based housing reforms and the ‘right to the city’: the variegated experiences of New York, Amsterdam and Tokyo," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 268-292, July.
    4. Martin Lux & Martina Mikeszova, 2012. "Property Restitution and Private Rental Housing in Transition: The Case of the Czech Republic," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 77-96.
    5. Justin Kadi & Richard Ronald, 2014. "Market-based housing reforms and the ‘right to the city’: the variegated experiences of New York, Amsterdam and Tokyo," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 268-292, July.
    6. Adriana Soaita, 2012. "Strategies for Home Improvement in Romanian Large Housing Estates," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(7), pages 1008-1030.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Szymon Marcińczak & Michael Gentile, 2023. "A Window Into the European City: Exploring Socioeconomic Residential Segregation in Urban Poland," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 114(3), pages 252-266, July.
    2. Debrunner, Gabriela & Hartmann, Thomas, 2020. "Strategic use of land policy instruments for affordable housing – Coping with social challenges under scarce land conditions in Swiss cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    3. Musterd, Sako & Marci?czak, Szymon & van Ham, Maarten & Tammaru, Tiit, 2015. "Socio-Economic Segregation in European Capital Cities: Increasing Separation between Poor and Rich," IZA Discussion Papers 9603, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Agnieszka Ogrodowczyk & Szymon Marcińczak, 2021. "Market-Based Housing Reforms and the Residualization of Public Housing: The Experience of Lodz, Poland," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 91-103.
    5. Ingmar Pastak & Anneli KÄHRIK, 2021. "SYMBOLIC DISPLACEMENT REVISITED: Place‐making Narratives in Gentrifying Neighbourhoods of Tallinn," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 814-834, September.
    6. Cody Hochstenbach & Wouter PC van Gent, 2015. "An anatomy of gentrification processes: variegating causes of neighbourhood change," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(7), pages 1480-1501, July.
    7. Petar Vranic & Ljiljana Vasilevska & Tigran Haas, 2016. "Hybrid spatialities: Multi-storey extensions of socialist blocks of flats under post-socialist transition in Serbia, the case of Nis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(6), pages 1261-1277, May.
    8. Hazel Easthope & Laura Crommelin & Sophie-May Kerr & Laurence Troy & Ryan van den Nouwelant & Gethin Davison, 2022. "Planning for Lower-Income Households in Privately Developed High-Density Neighbourhoods in Sydney, Australia," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 213-228.
    9. Anneli Kährik & Jana Temelová & Kati Kadarik & Jan Kubeš, 2016. "What attracts people to inner city areas? The cases of two post-socialist cities in Estonia and the Czech Republic," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(2), pages 355-372, February.
    10. Richard SENDI & Barbara Èerniè MALI, 2015. "Surviving In Limbo: An Insight Into Slovenia’S Informal Private Rented Housing Sector," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(4), pages 19-39, November.
    11. Sako Musterd & Wouter PC van Gent & Marjolijn Das & Jan Latten, 2016. "Adaptive behaviour in urban space: Residential mobility in response to social distance," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(2), pages 227-246, February.
    12. Robert Musil & Florian Brand & Hannes Huemer & Maximilian Wonaschütz, 2022. "The Zinshaus market and gentrification dynamics: The transformation of the historic housing stock in Vienna, 2007–2019," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(5), pages 974-994, April.
    13. Andreja Cirman & Srna MandiÄ & Jelena Zorić, 2013. "Decisions to Renovate: Identifying Key Determinants in Central and Eastern European Post-socialist Countries," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(16), pages 3378-3393, December.
    14. Rouwendal, Jan & Keus, Adriaan & Dekkers, Jasper, 2018. "Gentrification through the sale of rental housing? Evidence from Amsterdam," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 30-43.
    15. Chunhui Liu & Weixuan Song, 2019. "Perspectives of Socio-Spatial Differentiation from Soaring Housing Prices: A Case Study in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, May.
    16. Jane Zavisca & Theodore Gerber & Hyungjun Suh, 2021. "Housing Status in Post-Soviet Contexts: A Multi-dimensional Measurement Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 153(2), pages 609-634, January.
    17. Merle Zwiers & Maarten van Ham & Reinout Kleinhans, 2019. "The effects of physical restructuring on the socioeconomic status of neighbourhoods: Selective migration and upgrading," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(8), pages 1647-1663, June.
    18. Cody Hochstenbach & Willem R Boterman, 2017. "Intergenerational support shaping residential trajectories: Young people leaving home in a gentrifying city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(2), pages 399-420, February.
    19. Anu Printsmann & Raili Nugin & Hannes Palang, 2022. "Intricacies of Moral Geographies of Land Restitution in Estonia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-23, February.
    20. Vaníček Jiří, 2019. "Disparities in Urban Tourism in the Czech Republic," Czech Journal of Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 33-47, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:55:y:2018:i:13:p:2803-2820. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.