IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v54y2017i4p1038-1061.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deprived neighbourhoods in transition: Divergent pathways of change in the Greater Manchester city-region

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Hincks

Abstract

Many studies of neighbourhood change adopt a ‘bookend’ mode of analysis in which a baseline year is identified for a chosen outcome variable from which the magnitude of change is calculated to a determined endpoint typically over bi-decadal or decadal timeframes. However, this mode of analysis smoothes away short-run change patterns and neighbourhood dynamics. The implications of this practice could be far reaching if it is accepted that as neighbourhoods change they are liable to cross a threshold and transition from one state to another in the short- as well as longer-term. In a case study of deprived neighbourhoods in the Greater Manchester city-region, this paper aims to contribute to neighbourhood change debates in two ways. The first is by isolating transition pathways for individual neighbourhoods using annual change data. The second is by testing the thesis that the more deprived a neighbourhood is, the more likely it is to respond with greater volatility to short-run shocks when compared with less-deprived neighbourhoods. Four indicators collected annually between 2001 and 2010 are used to develop a typology of neighbourhood change and a subsequent typology of neighbourhood transition. The analysis exposed 260 different transition pathways that deprived neighbourhoods followed over the study period. Multinomial logistic regression was then used to determine the odds of a neighbourhood undergoing transition along a specific pathway owing to its level of deprivation. The model revealed that the most deprived neighbourhoods were likely to follow more volatile transition pathways compared with the less-deprived neighbourhoods especially during periods of economic difficulty.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Hincks, 2017. "Deprived neighbourhoods in transition: Divergent pathways of change in the Greater Manchester city-region," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(4), pages 1038-1061, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:54:y:2017:i:4:p:1038-1061
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098015619142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098015619142
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098015619142?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christina Beatty & Stephen Fothergill, 2002. "Hidden Unemployment Among Men: A Case Study," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(8), pages 811-823.
    2. Nancy Denton & Douglas Massey, 1991. "Patterns of neighborhood transition in a multiethnic world: U.S. Metropolitan areas, 1970–1980," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 28(1), pages 41-63, February.
    3. Alan Harding & Michael Harloe & James Rees, 2010. "Manchester's Bust Regime?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 981-991, December.
    4. Alasdair Rae, 2012. "Spatially Concentrated Deprivation in England: An Empirical Assessment," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(9), pages 1183-1199, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mikael Holmqvist, 2009. "Medicalization of unemployment: individualizing social issues as personal problems in the Swedish welfare state," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 23(3), pages 405-421, September.
    2. Caitlin Robinson & Stefan Bouzarovski & Sarah Lindley, 2018. "Underrepresenting neighbourhood vulnerabilities? The measurement of fuel poverty in England," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(5), pages 1109-1127, August.
    3. O'Leary, Nigel C. & Murphy, Philip D. & Latreille, Paul L. & Blackaby, David H. & Sloane, Peter J., 2005. "Accounting for Differences in Labour Market Outcomes in Great Britain: A Regional Analysis Using the Labour Force Survey," IZA Discussion Papers 1501, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Zhongfa Zhou & Changli Zhu, 2022. "Relative Spatial Poverty Within Guizhou Province, A Multidimensional Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 151-170, May.
    5. Maria Plotnikova, 2020. "Explaining Spatial Patterns Of Incapacity Benefit Claimant Rolls," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 14(2), pages 35-47, DECEMBER.
    6. Ingrid Gould Ellen, 2000. "Race-based Neighbourhood Projection: A Proposed Framework for Understanding New Data on Racial Integration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(9), pages 1513-1533, August.
    7. Stephen Hincks, 2015. "Neighbourhood Change and Deprivation in the Greater Manchester City-Region," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(2), pages 430-449, February.
    8. Simon Parker & Michael Harloe, 2015. "What Place For The Region? Reflections on the Regional Question and the International Journal of Urban and Regional Research," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 361-371, March.
    9. Vanessa Beck & Martin Quinn, 2011. "The Importance of Health in Promoting Employability in the East Midlands," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(1), pages 9-20, February.
    10. Melanie Jones, 2004. "The Dynamic Benchmarking of Labour Markets," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(5), pages 493-504.
    11. Peter Matthews & Christopher Poyner, 2019. "The experience of living in deprived neighbourhoods for LGBT+ people: Making home in difficult circumstances," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(7), pages 1499-1515, October.
    12. Edward Yates & Ian Clark & William Rossiter, 2021. "Local economic governance strategies in the UK’s post-industrial cities and the challenges of improving local work and employment conditions," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(2), pages 115-132, March.
    13. George Galster & Jackie Cutsinger & Up Lim, 2007. "Are Neighbourhoods Self-stabilising? Exploring Endogenous Dynamics," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(1), pages 167-185, January.
    14. Mattioli, Giulio & Wadud, Zia & Lucas, Karen, 2018. "Vulnerability to fuel price increases in the UK: A household level analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 227-242.
    15. Easterly William, 2009. "Empirics of Strategic Interdependence: The Case of the Racial Tipping Point," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-35, June.
    16. Mark Ellis & Richard Wright & Lee Fiorio & Steven Holloway, 2018. "Predicting neighborhood racial change in large US metropolitan areas, 1990–2010," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(6), pages 1022-1037, November.
    17. Christina Beatty & Steve Fothergill, 2023. "The persistence of hidden unemployment among incapacity claimants in large parts of Britain," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 38(1), pages 42-60, February.
    18. Wouter Vermeulen, 2006. "Regional disparities in a small country? An analysis of regional unemployment and participation differentials in the Netherlands from 1975 to 2003," CPB Document 113.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    19. Katharine Weston, 2012. "Debating conditionality for disability benefits recipients and welfare reform: Research evidence from Pathways to Work," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 27(5-6), pages 514-528, August.
    20. Wouter Vermeulen, 2006. "Regional disparities in a small country? An analysis of regional unemployment and participation differentials in the Netherlands from 1975 to 2003," CPB Document 113, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:54:y:2017:i:4:p:1038-1061. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.