IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v52y2015i11p2001-2017.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participatory urban planning in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Teresa Caldeira

    (Department of City and Regional Planning, University of California, Berkeley, USA)

  • James Holston

    (Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, USA)

Abstract

This paper focuses on participatory urban planning as a model of urban reform and democratic invention in Brazil. Its case material regards the formulation and implementation of two sets of urban laws of very broad consequence. First, we discuss briefly the chapter on urban policy in the 1988 Citizen Constitution and the federal law that it mandates. The latter is the Estatuto da Cidade, the City Statute, from 2001, which required that 1600 cities (approximately 30%) of Brazilian municipalities either create Master Plans or reformulate existing ones according to its principles and on the basis of popular participation. Second, we focus on São Paulo’s Master Plan (2002) and Zoning Law (2004) that fulfill this requirement and on the Plan’s required revision in 2007. By examining this massive constitutionally mandated formulation of urban policy, our aim is to analyse the development of a new paradigm of urban policy that reinvents master planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Teresa Caldeira & James Holston, 2015. "Participatory urban planning in Brazil," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(11), pages 2001-2017, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:52:y:2015:i:11:p:2001-2017
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098014524461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098014524461
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098014524461?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raquel Rolnik, 2011. "Democracy on the Edge: Limits and Possibilities in the Implementation of an Urban Reform Agenda in Brazil," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 239-255, March.
    2. Lucy Earle, 2013. "Drawing the Line between State and Society: Social Movements, Participation and Autonomy in Brazil," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(1), pages 56-71, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zoomers, Annelies & van Noorloos, Femke & Otsuki, Kei & Steel, Griet & van Westen, Guus, 2017. "The Rush for Land in an Urbanizing World: From Land Grabbing Toward Developing Safe, Resilient, and Sustainable Cities and Landscapes," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 242-252.
    2. Philipp Horn & Diana Mitlin & Jhono Bennett & Beth Chitekwe-Biti & Jack Makau, 2018. "Towards citywide participatory planning: emerging community-led practices in three African cities," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 342018, GDI, The University of Manchester.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Paula Pimentel Walker & María Arquero de Alarcón, 2018. "The Competing Social and Environmental Functions of Private Urban Land: The Case of an Informal Land Occupation in São Paulo’s South Periphery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-24, November.
    2. Philipp Horn & Diana Mitlin & Jhono Bennett & Beth Chitekwe-Biti & Jack Makau, 2018. "Towards citywide participatory planning: emerging community-led practices in three African cities," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 342018, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    3. Alejandra Reyes & Patricia Basile, 2022. "The Distinctive Evolution Of Housing Financialization In Brazil And Mexico," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(6), pages 933-953, November.
    4. Abigail Friendly & Kristine Stiphany, 2019. "Paradigm or paradox? The ‘cumbersome impasse’ of the participatory turn in Brazilian urban planning," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(2), pages 271-287, February.
    5. Abdoumaliq Simone, 2016. "It's Just the City after All!," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 210-218, January.
    6. Diana Mitlin, 2014. "Politics, informality and clientelism – exploring a pro-poor urban politics," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-034-14, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    7. Mara Nogueira, 2024. "“The Worker's Party sold out the street vendors†: Revanchist populism and the crisis of labor in Belo Horizonte, Brazil," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 42(4), pages 527-543, June.
    8. Ana Paula Pimentel Walker, 2015. "The Conflation of Participatory Budgeting and Public–Private Partnerships in Porto Alegre, Brazil: The Construction of a Working-Class Mall for Street Hawkers," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(1), pages 165-184, January.
    9. Michael Janoschka & Jorge Sequera & Luis Salinas, 2014. "Gentrification in Spain and Latin America — a Critical Dialogue," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1234-1265, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:52:y:2015:i:11:p:2001-2017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.