IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v50y2013i6p1130-1147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dealing with Diversity: Middle-class Family Households and the Issue of ‘Black’ and ‘White’ Schools in Amsterdam

Author

Listed:
  • Willem R. Boterman

Abstract

The urban middle classes often celebrate the diversity of their neighbourhood. As soon as they have children, however, the desire to display symbolic capital may conflict with the need to reproduce cultural capital through the educational system. In the ethnically diverse Amsterdam schooling context, in which parents have free school choice and school access is not determined by fees, the socio-spatial strategies of school choice could be expected to differ from particularly the UK context. Based on in-depth interviews conducted with white middle-class parents in Amsterdam, this study argues that ethnic diversity is a major concern when they are seeing primary schools for their children, but that middle-class fractions have different socio-spatial strategies for managing it. It is argued that, despite differences in terms of housing market and school policies, the strategies of the Amsterdam middle classes are very similar to other contexts, suggesting homologies of class between national contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Willem R. Boterman, 2013. "Dealing with Diversity: Middle-class Family Households and the Issue of ‘Black’ and ‘White’ Schools in Amsterdam," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(6), pages 1130-1147, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:50:y:2013:i:6:p:1130-1147
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098012461673
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098012461673
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098012461673?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Burgess & Deborah Wilson & Ruth Lupton, 2005. "Parallel Lives? Ethnic Segregation in Schools and Neighbourhoods," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(7), pages 1027-1056, June.
    2. Tim Butler & Chris Hamnett, 2007. "The Geography of Education: Introduction," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(7), pages 1161-1174, June.
    3. Gary Bridge, 2006. "It's not Just a Question of Taste: Gentrification, the Neighbourhood, and Cultural Capital," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(10), pages 1965-1978, October.
    4. Garry Robson & Tim Butler, 2001. "Coming to Terms with London: Middle‐class Communities in a Global City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 70-86, March.
    5. Dennis Leech & Erick Campos, 2003. "Is comprehensive education really free?: a case‐study of the effects of secondary school admissions policies on house prices in one local area," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 166(1), pages 135-154, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brian Doucet, 2014. "A Process of Change and a Changing Process: Introduction to the Special Issue on Contemporary Gentrification," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 105(2), pages 125-139, April.
    2. Gary Bridge, 2014. "Afterword: The Times and Spaces of Gentrification," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 105(2), pages 231-236, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Willem Boterman & Sako Musterd & Carolina Pacchi & Costanzo Ranci, 2019. "School segregation in contemporary cities: Socio-spatial dynamics, institutional context and urban outcomes," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(15), pages 3055-3073, November.
    2. Pierre Courtioux & Tristan-Pierre Maury, 2020. "Private and public schools: A spatial analysis of social segregation in France," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(4), pages 865-882, March.
    3. Gary Bridge & Tim Butler & Patrick Le Galès, 2014. "Power Relations and Social Mix in Metropolitan Neighbourhoods in North America and Europe: Moving Beyond Gentrification?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1133-1141, July.
    4. Jessica Pykett, 2009. "Making Citizens in the Classroom: An Urban Geography of Citizenship Education?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(4), pages 803-823, April.
    5. Willem R Boterman, 2019. "The role of geography in school segregation in the free parental choice context of Dutch cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(15), pages 3074-3094, November.
    6. Venla Bernelius & Katja Vilkama, 2019. "Pupils on the move: School catchment area segregation and residential mobility of urban families," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(15), pages 3095-3116, November.
    7. Rebecca Cavicchia & Roberta Cucca, 2020. "Densification and School Segregation: The Case of Oslo," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 217-229.
    8. Rebecca Cavicchia & Roberta Cucca, 2020. "Densification and School Segregation: The Case of Oslo," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 217-229.
    9. Isabel Ramos Lobato & Thomas Groos, 2019. "Choice as a duty? The abolition of primary school catchment areas in North Rhine-Westphalia/Germany and its impact on parent choice strategies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(15), pages 3274-3291, November.
    10. Chris Hamnett, 2003. "Gentrification and the Middle-class Remaking of Inner London, 1961-2001," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(12), pages 2401-2426, November.
    11. Kleemann, Janina & Struve, Berenike & Spyra, Marcin, 2023. "Conflicts in urban peripheries in Europe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    12. Tim Butler, 2007. "Re‐urbanizing London Docklands: Gentrification, Suburbanization or New Urbanism?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 759-781, December.
    13. Tom Slater & Winifred Curran & Loretta Lees, 2004. "Guest Editorial," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(7), pages 1141-1150, July.
    14. Antoine Paccoud, 2017. "Buy-to-let gentrification: Extending social change through tenure shifts," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(4), pages 839-856, April.
    15. Andy Dickerson & Steven McIntosh, 2013. "The Impact of Distance to Nearest Education Institution on the Post-compulsory Education Participation Decision," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(4), pages 742-758, March.
    16. Loretta Lees, 2003. "Super-gentrification: The Case of Brooklyn Heights, New York City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(12), pages 2487-2509, November.
    17. Yan Xu & Weixuan Song & Chunhui Liu, 2018. "Social-Spatial Accessibility to Urban Educational Resources under the School District System: A Case Study of Public Primary Schools in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    18. Venla Bernelius & Heidi Huilla & Isabel Ramos Lobato, 2021. "‘Notorious Schools’ in ‘Notorious Places’? Exploring the Connectedness of Urban and Educational Segregation," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 154-165.
    19. Ayo Mansaray, 2018. "Complicity and contestation in the gentrifying urban primary school," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(14), pages 3076-3091, November.
    20. Deborah Wilson & Gary Bridge, 2019. "School choice and the city: Geographies of allocation and segregation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(15), pages 3198-3215, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:50:y:2013:i:6:p:1130-1147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.