IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v47y2010i6p1343-1366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Timely Partnerships? Contrasting Geographies of Activism in New Zealand and Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Ruth Panelli

    (Department of Geography, University College London, Gower St, London, WC1E 6BT, UK, r.panelli@ucl.ac.uk)

  • Wendy Larner

    (School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, University Road, Bristol, BS8 1SS, UK, w.larner@bristol.ac.uk)

Abstract

Analyses of activism have inspired geographers for many years, but most of this work has focused on relatively short time-frames, events and struggles. This paper suggests that there is much to be gained from a greater engagement with issues of time and time—spaces. It outlines and applies the contrasting conceptions of chrono / chora and kairo / topos notions of time—space as potentially useful ways to interrogate geographies of activism. The paper focuses on two specific forms of activism—an Australian women’s ‘Heritage Project’ and a New Zealand ‘Fishbowl’ evaluation of a community development programme— to show how politics is contingent on diverse temporal as well as spatial conditions. It reveals the complex navigations that are made as these politics are negotiated via both mutual learning processes and the forging of new activist—state relations. It is concluded that these ‘timely partnerships’ have involved moving beyond adversarial conceptions of ‘state’ and ‘activist’, but at the risk of reconstituting activism as ‘social capital’.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruth Panelli & Wendy Larner, 2010. "Timely Partnerships? Contrasting Geographies of Activism in New Zealand and Australia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(6), pages 1343-1366, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:47:y:2010:i:6:p:1343-1366
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098009360226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098009360226
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098009360226?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mike Kesby, 2007. "Spatialising Participatory Approaches: The Contribution of Geography to a Mature Debate," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(12), pages 2813-2831, December.
    2. Lily Kong & Lisa Law, 2002. "Introduction : Contested Landscapes, Asian Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(9), pages 1503-1512, August.
    3. Bettina Köhler & Markus Wissen, 2003. "Glocalizing protest: urban conflicts and the global social movements," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 942-951, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Routledge, 2010. "Introduction: Cities, Justice and Conflict," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(6), pages 1165-1177, May.
    2. Nathan Marom, 2013. "Activising Space: The Spatial Politics of the 2011 Protest Movement in Israel," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(13), pages 2826-2841, October.
    3. McLaughlin, Colleen & Swartz, Sharlene & Cobbett, Mary & Kiragu, Susan, 2015. "Inviting Backchat: How schools and communities in Ghana, Swaziland and Kenya support children to contextualise knowledge and create agency through sexuality education," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 208-216.
    4. Andreas Novy & Daniela Coimbra Swiatek & Frank Moulaert, 2012. "Social Cohesion: A Conceptual and Political Elucidation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(9), pages 1873-1889, July.
    5. Dolinska, Aleksandra, 2017. "Bringing farmers into the game. Strengthening farmers' role in the innovation process through a simulation game, a case from Tunisia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 129-139.
    6. Gavin Brown, 2007. "Mutinous Eruptions: Autonomous Spaces of Radical Queer Activism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(11), pages 2685-2698, November.
    7. Luís Mendes, 2020. "How Can We Quarantine Without a Home? Responses of Activism and Urban Social Movements in Times of COVID‐19 Pandemic Crisis in Lisbon," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 111(3), pages 318-332, July.
    8. Green, Kathryn E. & Lund, Jens Friis, 2015. "The politics of expertise in participatory forestry: a case from Tanzania," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 27-34.
    9. Somdeep Sen, 2021. "Antagonistic landscapes," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(4), pages 705-721, June.
    10. Marc Dijk & Joop De Kraker & Anique Hommels, 2018. "Anticipating Constraints on Upscaling from Urban Innovation Experiments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    11. Yong-Sook Lee & Brenda S. A. Yeoh, 2004. "Introduction: Globalisation and the Politics of Forgetting," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(12), pages 2295-2301, November.
    12. Livia Fritz & Claudia R. Binder, 2018. "Participation as Relational Space: A Critical Approach to Analysing Participation in Sustainability Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-29, August.
    13. Veit Bachmann & Sami Moisio, 2020. "Towards a constructive critical geopolitics – Inspirations from the Frankfurt School of critical theory," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(2), pages 251-268, March.
    14. William Sites, 2007. "Beyond Trenches and Grassroots? Reflections on Urban Mobilization, Fragmentation, and the Anti-Wal-Mart Campaign in Chicago," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(11), pages 2632-2651, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:47:y:2010:i:6:p:1343-1366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.