IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v47y2010i14p3079-3101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hospitality, Culture and Regeneration: Urban Decay, Entrepreneurship and the ‘Ruin’ Bars of Budapest

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Lugosi

    (Peter Lugosi is in the School of Services Management, Bournemouth University, Talbot Campus, Dorset House, Fern Barrow, Poole, BH12 5BB, UK, plugosi@bournemouth.ac.uk)

  • David Bell

    (David Bell is in the School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK, d.j.bell@leeds.ac.uk)

  • Krisztina Lugosi

    (Krisztina Lugosi is in the School of Services Management, Bournemouth University, Talbot Campus, Dorset House, Fern Barrow, Poole, BH12 5BB, UK, krisztina.lugosi@ntlworld.com)

Abstract

This paper considers the relationships between hospitality, culture and urban regeneration through an examination of rom (ruin) venues, which operate in dilapidated buildings in Budapest, Hungary. The paper reviews previous work on culture and urban regeneration in order to locate the role of hospitality within emerging debates. It subsequently interrogates the evolution of the rom phenomenon and demonstrates how, in this context, hospitality thrives because of social and physical decay in urban locations, how operators and entrepreneurs exploit conflicts among various actors involved in regeneration and how hospitality may be mobilised purposefully in the regeneration process. The paper demonstrates how networked entrepreneurship maintains these operations and how various forms of cultural production are entangled and mobilised in the venues’ hospitality propositions.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Lugosi & David Bell & Krisztina Lugosi, 2010. "Hospitality, Culture and Regeneration: Urban Decay, Entrepreneurship and the ‘Ruin’ Bars of Budapest," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(14), pages 3079-3101, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:47:y:2010:i:14:p:3079-3101
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098009360236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098009360236
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098009360236?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zorica Nedović-Budić & Sasha Tsenkova & Peter Marcuse, 2006. "The urban mosaic of post-socialist Europe," Contributions to Economics, in: Sasha Tsenkova & Zorica Nedović-Budić (ed.), The Urban Mosaic of Post-Socialist Europe, chapter 1, pages 3-20, Springer.
    2. Iván Tosics, 2006. "Spatial restructuring in post-socialist Budapest," Contributions to Economics, in: Sasha Tsenkova & Zorica Nedović-Budić (ed.), The Urban Mosaic of Post-Socialist Europe, chapter 7, pages 131-150, Springer.
    3. Gil M Doron, 2000. "The Dead Zone and the Architecture of Transgression," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 247-263.
    4. Alan Latham, 2003. "Urbanity, Lifestyle and Making Sense of the New Urban Cultural Economy: Notes from Auckland, New Zealand," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(9), pages 1699-1724, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ines Grigorescu & Cristina Dumitrică & Monica Dumitrașcu & Bianca Mitrică & Costin Dumitrașcu, 2021. "Urban Development and the (Re)use of the Communist-Built Industrial and Agricultural Sites after 1990. The Showcase of Bucharest–Ilfov Development Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Milica P. Milojević & Marija Maruna & Aleksandra Djordjević, 2019. "Transition of Collective Land in Modernistic Residential Settings in New Belgrade, Serbia," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Robert R. Hewitt, 2014. "Globalization and Landscape Architecture," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440135, February.
    4. Szymon Marcinczak & Iwona Sagan, 2011. "The Socio-Spatial Restructuring of Lódz, Poland," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(9), pages 1789-1809, July.
    5. Ratka ÄŒolić & Ä orÄ‘e Milić & Jasna Petrić & NataÅ¡a ÄŒolić, 2022. "Institutional capacity development within the national urban policy formation process – Participants’ views," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(1), pages 69-89, February.
    6. Suzanne Vallance, 2014. "Living on the Edge: Lessons from the Peri-urban Village," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 1954-1969, November.
    7. Dorota Mantey, 2021. "Objective and Subjective Determinants of Neighborhood Satisfaction in the Context of Retrofitting Suburbs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Perić Ana, 2016. "Institutional Cooperation in the Brownfield Regeneration Process: Experiences from Central and Eastern European Countries," European Spatial Research and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 23(1), pages 21-46, June.
    9. Jana Temelová & Jakub Novák & Martin OuÅ™ednÃ­Ä ek & Petra Puldová, 2011. "Housing Estates in the Czech Republic after Socialism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(9), pages 1811-1834, July.
    10. Eric R. Sarmiento, 2017. "Synergies in alternative food network research: embodiment, diverse economies, and more-than-human food geographies," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(2), pages 485-497, June.
    11. Ksenija Lalović & Jelena Živković & Uroš Radosavljević & Zoran Đukanović, 2019. "An Integral Approach to the Modeling of Information Support for Local Sustainable Development—Experiences of a Serbian Enabling Leadership Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, May.
    12. Andrew Gorman-Murray & Catherine Nash, 2017. "Transformations in LGBT consumer landscapes and leisure spaces in the neoliberal city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(3), pages 786-805, February.
    13. Martin J. Murray, 2021. "Ruination and Rejuvenation: Rethinking Growth and Decline through an Inverted Telescope," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 348-362, March.
    14. Andrew Charman & Thiresh Govender, 2020. "The Creative Night‐Time Leisure Economy of Informal Drinking Venues," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 793-808, September.
    15. Ioan Sebastian Jucu & Sorina Voiculescu, 2020. "Abandoned Places and Urban Marginalized Sites in Lugoj Municipality, Three Decades after Romania’s State-Socialist Collapse," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-26, September.
    16. Luděk Sýkora, 2009. "New Socio‐Spatial Formations: Places Of Residential Segregation And Separation In Czechia," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 100(4), pages 417-435, September.
    17. Liu Yang & Koen H. van Dam & Lufeng Zhang, 2020. "Developing Goals and Indicators for the Design of Sustainable and Integrated Transport Infrastructure and Urban Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-34, November.
    18. Joanna Taylor & Liz Twigg & John Mohan, 2015. "Understanding neighbourhood perceptions of alcohol-related anti-social behaviour," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(12), pages 2186-2202, September.
    19. Minseo Kim & Christoph D. D. Rupprecht & Katsunori Furuya, 2018. "Residents’ Perception of Informal Green Space—A Case Study of Ichikawa City, Japan," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-20, September.
    20. Oleg Golubchikov & Anna Badyina & Alla Makhrova, 2014. "The Hybrid Spatialities of Transition: Capitalism, Legacy and Uneven Urban Economic Restructuring," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(4), pages 617-633, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:47:y:2010:i:14:p:3079-3101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.