IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v46y2009i7p1363-1384.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Migration from the EU 'A8' Accession Countries and the Impact on Low-demand Housing Areas: Opportunity or Threat for Housing Market Renewal Pathfinder Programmes in England?

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Pemberton

    (Department of Civic Design, University of Liverpool, 74 Bedford Street South, Liverpool, L69 7ZQ, UK, simon.pemberton@liv.ac.uk)

Abstract

Since EU enlargement in 2004, there has been a substantial influx of economic migrants to the UK from the `A8' accession countries. A significant number have moved into Housing Market Renewal Pathfinder areas, which are focused on reshaping failing housing markets. Through case study analysis, the degree to which such movement is beneficial—through stabilising areas of low demand and improving community cohesion—or problematic, given the increased demands on local services, is discussed. The research indicates that migrants are positively impacting upon such areas by increasing demand for private rented and owner-occupied housing, as well as having skills and qualifications that are supportive of achieving regional employment targets. However, the nature of such movements suggests that a review of HMR policy may be necessary, particularly in terms of how initiatives can respond to the needs and housing aspirations of those residents at most risk of social exclusion.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Pemberton, 2009. "Economic Migration from the EU 'A8' Accession Countries and the Impact on Low-demand Housing Areas: Opportunity or Threat for Housing Market Renewal Pathfinder Programmes in England?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(7), pages 1363-1384, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:46:y:2009:i:7:p:1363-1384
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098009104570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098009104570
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098009104570?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne Power & William Julius Wilson, 2000. "Social Exclusion and the Future of Cities," CASE Papers case35, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    2. Ash Amin, 2002. "Ethnicity and the Multicultural City: Living with Diversity," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(6), pages 959-980, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siyu Chen & Ying Chang & Jack S. Benton & Bing Chen & Hongchen Hu & Jing Lu, 2024. "Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Health-Related Behaviours in Community Gardens in China: An Evaluation of a Natural Experiment," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Francis Leo Collins & Wardlow Friesen, 2011. "Making the Most of Diversity? The Intercultural City Project and a Rescaled Version of Diversity in Auckland, New Zealand," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(14), pages 3067-3085, November.
    3. Karien Dekker & Gideon Bolt, 2005. "Social Cohesion in Post-war Estates in the Netherlands: Differences between Socioeconomic and Ethnic Groups," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(13), pages 2447-2470, December.
    4. Lina Jamoul & Jane Wills, 2008. "Faith in Politics," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(10), pages 2035-2056, September.
    5. William A. V. Clark & Philip S. Morrison, 2012. "Socio-spatial Mobility and Residential Sorting: Evidence from a Large-scale Survey," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(15), pages 3253-3270, November.
    6. Renia Ehrenfeucht & Marla Nelson, 2013. "Young Professionals as Ambivalent Change Agents in New Orleans after the 2005 Hurricanes," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(4), pages 825-841, March.
    7. Joanne Sharp & Venda Pollock & Ronan Paddison, 2005. "Just Art for a Just City: Public Art and Social Inclusion in Urban Regeneration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(5-6), pages 1001-1023, May.
    8. Großmann, Katrin & Franke, Robert & Henkel, Laura, 2021. "Erfahrungsbericht Segregationsanalysen, Teil 2: Empirische Befunde," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Steinführer, Annett & Porsche, Lars & Sondermann, Martin (ed.), Kompendium Kleinstadtforschung, volume 16, pages 258-274, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    9. Carol Vincent & Sarah Neal & Humera Iqbal, 2017. "Encounters with diversity: Children’s friendships and parental responses," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(8), pages 1974-1989, June.
    10. Andrea Wigfield & Royce Turner, 2013. "The Development of the Good Relations Measurement Framework in Britain: A Template for Experiential Social Measurement," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 114(2), pages 655-686, November.
    11. Eva (Evangelia) Papatzani, 2021. "Encountering Everyday Racist Practices: Sociospatial Negotiations of Immigrant Settlement in Athens, Greece," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1), pages 61-79, January.
    12. Giada Casarin & Julie MacLeavy & David Manley, 2023. "Rethinking urban utopianism: The fallacy of social mix in the 15-minute city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(16), pages 3167-3186, December.
    13. Paola Briata, 2017. "G. Marconi, E. Ostanel, I. B. Tauris (eds), reviewed by Paola Briata," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 137-139, January.
    14. Bruno Meeus & Luce Beeckmans & Bas van Heur & Karel Arnaut, 2020. "Broadening the Urban Planning Repertoire with an ‘Arrival Infrastructures’ Perspective," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 11-22.
    15. Susanne Wessendorf, 2019. "Migrant belonging, social location and the neighbourhood: Recent migrants in East London and Birmingham," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(1), pages 131-146, January.
    16. Ahlam Al-Muwil & Vishanth Weerakkody & Ramzi El-haddadeh & Yogesh Dwivedi, 2019. "Balancing Digital-By-Default with Inclusion: A Study of the Factors Influencing E-Inclusion in the UK," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 635-659, June.
    17. OKEKE, Ijeoma Chinwe (Ph.D) & ALONTA, Gabriel Chidiebere, 2023. "Entrepreneurship Education And Informal Sector: Implications For Sustainable Economic Development," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 10(8), pages 297-305, August.
    18. Jonathan Rokem & Laura Vaughan, 2018. "Segregation, mobility and encounters in Jerusalem: The role of public transport infrastructure in connecting the ‘divided city’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(15), pages 3454-3473, November.
    19. Gwen van Eijk, 2012. "Good Neighbours in Bad Neighbourhoods: Narratives of Dissociation and Practices of Neighbouring in a ‘Problem’ Place," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(14), pages 3009-3026, November.
    20. Colin Lorne, 2020. "The limits to openness: Co-working, design and social innovation in the neoliberal city," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(4), pages 747-765, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:46:y:2009:i:7:p:1363-1384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.