IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v39y2002i8p1471-1478.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bridging the Divide? Complementary Perspectives on Property

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Guy

    (School of Architecture and Plarming and Landscape, University of NewcastLe, Claremont Tower, Newcastle upon Tyne, NEI 7RU, UK. s.c.guy@ncL.ac.uk)

  • John Henneberry

    (Department of Town and Regional Planning, UniversityofSheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S102TN, UK. j.henneberry@sheffieldac.uk)

Abstract

In a recent paper, we argued for the need to develop an understanding of property development processes which combines a sensitivity to the economic and social framing of development strategies with a fine-grain treatment of the locally contingent responses of property actors. This is a response to Ball's criticisms of that paper, which offer a misleading characterisation of our methodological and theoretical position with regard to property research.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Guy & John Henneberry, 2002. "Bridging the Divide? Complementary Perspectives on Property," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(8), pages 1471-1478, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:39:y:2002:i:8:p:1471-1478
    DOI: 10.1080/00420980220142736
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980220142736
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420980220142736?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H Leitner, 1994. "Capital Markets, the Development Industry, and Urban Office Market Dynamics: Rethinking Building Cycles," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 26(5), pages 779-802, May.
    2. Michael Ball, 1998. "Institutions in British Property Research: A Review," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(9), pages 1501-1517, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Massimo Cecchini & Ilaria Zambon & Luca Salvati, 2019. "Housing and the City: A Spatial Analysis of Residential Building Activity and the Socio-Demographic Background in a Mediterranean City, 1990–2017," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Heeg Susanne, 2009. "Wie Phönix aus der Asche?: Immobilienwirtschaftliche Forschung in der Geographie," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 53(1-2), pages 129-137, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tsu Lung Chou & Yu Chun Lin, 2007. "Industrial Park Development across the Taiwan Strait," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(8), pages 1405-1425, July.
    2. Simon Guy & John Henneberry, 2000. "Understanding Urban Development Processes: Integrating the Economic and the Social in Property Research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(13), pages 2399-2416, December.
    3. John Henneberry & Claire Roberts, 2008. "Calculated Inequality? Portfolio Benchmarking and Regional Office Property Investment in the UK," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(5-6), pages 1217-1241, May.
    4. repec:dgr:rugsom:02d31 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Edwin Buitelaar & Maaike Galle & Niels Sorel, 2014. "The public planning of private planning: an analysis of controlled spontaneity in the Netherlands," Chapters, in: David Emanuel Andersson & Stefano Moroni (ed.), Cities and Private Planning, chapter 12, pages 248-268, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Edwin Buitelaar, 2004. "A Transaction-cost Analysis of the Land Development Process," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(13), pages 2539-2553, December.
    7. Rachel Weber, 2010. "Selling City Futures: The Financialization of Urban Redevelopment Policy," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 86(3), pages 251-274, July.
    8. Cheung, K.S. & Wong, S.K. & Wu, H. & Yiu, C.Y., 2021. "The land governance cost on co-ownership: A study of the cross-lease in New Zealand," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    9. Susan J. Smith & Moira Munro & Hazel Christie, 2006. "Performing (Housing) Markets," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(1), pages 81-98, January.
    10. Thierry Theurillat & Patrick Rérat & Olivier Crevoisier, 2015. "The real estate markets: Players, institutions and territories," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(8), pages 1414-1433, June.
    11. Sun Sheng Han & Yong Wang, 2003. "The Institutional Structure of a Property Market in Inland China: Chongqing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(1), pages 91-112, January.
    12. Alireza Dehesh & Cedric Pugh, 2000. "Property Cycles in a Global Economy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(13), pages 2581-2602, December.
    13. Bossuyt, Daniël & Salet, Willem & Majoor, Stan, 2018. "Commissioning as the cornerstone of self-build. Assessing the constraints and opportunities of self-build housing in the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 524-533.
    14. Robert A. Beauregard, 2005. "The Textures of Property Markets: Downtown Housing and Office Conversions in New York City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(13), pages 2431-2445, December.
    15. Pellenbarg, P.H. & Wissen, L.J.G. van & Dijk, J. van, 2002. "Firm relocation: state of the art and research prospects," Research Report 02D31, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    16. Michael Ball, 2003. "Markets and the Structure of the Housebuilding Industry: An International Perspective," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(5-6), pages 897-916, May.
    17. Barrie Needham & Arno Segeren & Edwin Buitelaar, 2011. "Institutions in Theories of Land Markets: Illustrated by the Dutch Market for Agricultural Land," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(1), pages 161-176, January.
    18. Yakup Egercioglu, 2006. "The Effects of Property Relations on Urban Renewal Project," ERSA conference papers ersa06p34, European Regional Science Association.
    19. Geoffrey Keogh & Eamonn D'Arcy, 1999. "Property Market Efficiency: An Institutional Economics Perspective," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(13), pages 2401-2414, December.
    20. Kaihuai Liao & Rainer Wehrhahn & Werner Breitung, 2019. "Urban planners and the production of gated communities in China: A structure–agency approach," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(13), pages 2635-2653, October.
    21. Jieming Zhu, 2005. "A Transitional Institution for the Emerging Land Market in Urban China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(8), pages 1369-1390, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:39:y:2002:i:8:p:1471-1478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.