IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v39y2002i12p2329-2343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Population Growth, Urbanisation and the Role of Government in China: A Political Economic Model of Demographic Change

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Feng

    (School of Politics and Economics, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA 91711, USA, Yi.Feng@cgu.edu)

  • Jacek Kugler

    (School of Politics and Economics, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA 91711, USA, Kugler@cgu.edu)

  • Paul J. Zak

    (School of Politics and Economics, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA 91711, USA, Paul.Zak@cgu.edu)

Abstract

This essay uses a political economy model to study the relationship between urbanisation and demographic change in China. The model identifies political stability and government capacity as two crucial factors that shape family decisions regarding the number of children. As population growth and economic growth are interrelated, a government can use the political process to achieve its economic objectives. The implications of the model are tested using Chinese data for 1960-95. The results show that, while those in the urban areas are supportive of the model, birth rates in the countryside do not confirm the theoretical proposal. The major policy implication of this discrepancy is that, in order to sustain its economic development, China must urbanise the countryside to facilitate not only economic but also political development so that a set of conditions favouring long-term growth can be generated.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Feng & Jacek Kugler & Paul J. Zak, 2002. "Population Growth, Urbanisation and the Role of Government in China: A Political Economic Model of Demographic Change," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(12), pages 2329-2343, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:39:y:2002:i:12:p:2329-2343
    DOI: 10.1080/0042098022000033908
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0042098022000033908
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0042098022000033908?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feng, Yi, 1997. "Democracy, Political Stability and Economic Growth," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(3), pages 391-418, July.
    2. Paul J. Zak, 2002. "Institutions, Property Rights, and Growth," Recherches économiques de Louvain, De Boeck Université, vol. 68(1), pages 55-73.
    3. Magee,Stephen P. & Brock,William A. & Young,Leslie, 1989. "Black Hole Tariffs and Endogenous Policy Theory," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521377003, September.
    4. Alberto Alesina & Nouriel Roubini & Gerald D. Cohen, 1997. "Political Cycles and the Macroeconomy," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262510944, April.
    5. William Lavely & Ronald Freedman, 1990. "The Origins of the Chinese Fertility Decline," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 27(3), pages 357-367, August.
    6. Yi Feng, 1997. "Economic reform in China: Logic and dynamism," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3-4), pages 315-332, May.
    7. Paul J. ZAK, 2002. "Institutions, Property Rights and Growth," Discussion Papers (REL - Recherches Economiques de Louvain) 2002014, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    8. Paul Zak, "undated". "Institutions, Property Rights, and Growth," Gruter Institute Working Papers on Law, Economics, and Evolutionary Biology 2-1-1009, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zak, Paul J. & Feng, Yi, 2003. "A dynamic theory of the transition to democracy," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Oguzhan Dincer & Christopher Ellis, 2005. "Predation, Protection, and Accumulation: Endogenous Property Rights in an Overlapping Generations Growth Model," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 12(4), pages 435-455, August.
    3. Lawrence King & Osvaldo Gómez Martínez, 2010. "Property Rights Reform and Development: A Critique of the Cross-National Regression Literature," Working Papers wp216, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    4. Andreas Irmen & Johanna Kuehnel, 2011. "Property rights, optimal public enforcement, and growth," DEM Discussion Paper Series 11-18, Department of Economics at the University of Luxembourg.
    5. Adusei, Elizabeth, 2020. "The impact of Foreign Aid on Economic Growth in Sub-Sahara Africa: The mediating role of Institutions," MPRA Paper 104561, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Chetan Ghate & Quan Vu Le & Paul J. Zak, 2003. "Optimal Fiscal Policy in an Economy Facing Sociopolitical Instability," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(4), pages 583-598, November.
    7. Fabien Ngendakuriyo, 2013. "Institutional Quality and Growth," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 15(1), pages 157-183, February.
    8. Ngendakuriyo, Fabien & Zaccour, Georges, 2013. "Fighting corruption: To precommit or not?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 149-154.
    9. Gradstein, Mark, 2003. "Governance and economic growth," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3098, The World Bank.
    10. Gradstein, Mark, 2004. "Governance and growth," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 505-518, April.
    11. Mtiraoui, Abderraouf, 2015. "La corruption entre l’aspect institutionnel économique et l’aspect social à travers la gouvernance [Corruption between economic institutional aspect and social aspect through governance]," MPRA Paper 61122, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Akaabre, Paul Boniface, 2023. "Traditional leasehold of land for residential and commercial use in Ghana: Structure and practices from the Golden Stool," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    13. Desai, Raj M. & Olofsgard, Anders, 2006. "The political advantage of soft budget constraints," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 370-387, June.
    14. Mehmet Asutay & Noor Zahirah Mohd Sidek, 2021. "Political economy of Islamic banking growth: Does political regime and institutions, governance and political risks matter?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 4226-4261, July.
    15. Charles B. Blankart & Gerrit B. Koester, 2006. "Political Economics versus Public Choice," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(2), pages 171-200, May.
    16. Yi Feng & Paul J. Zak, 1999. "The Determinants of Democratic Transitions," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 43(2), pages 162-177, April.
    17. Anders Gustafsson, 2019. "Busy doing nothing: why politicians implement inefficient policies," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 282-299, September.
    18. Weck-Hannemann, Hannelore, 1989. "Protectionism in direct democracy," Discussion Papers, Series II 79, University of Konstanz, Collaborative Research Centre (SFB) 178 "Internationalization of the Economy".
    19. Torsten Persson & Guido Tabellini, "undated". "Political Institutions and Policy Outcomes: What are the Stylized Facts?," Working Papers 189, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    20. Bin, Sheng, 2000. "The Political Economy of Trade Policy in China," Working Papers 10/2000, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Management, Politics & Philosophy.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:39:y:2002:i:12:p:2329-2343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.