IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v38y2001i8p1253-1272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Globalisation, Regions and the State: Exploring the Limitations of Economic Modernisation through Inward Investment

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas A. Phelps

    (School of Geography, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK, n.phelps@geog.leeds.ac.uk)

  • Mark Tewdwr-Jones

    (Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, Wates House, 22 Gordon Street, London, WCIHOQB, UK, m.tewdwr-jones@ucl.ac.uk)

Abstract

Over the past 10 years or so, the UK has witnessed intense interregional competition for a small number of large inward investment projects. These projects, examples of foreign direct investment (FDI) from Far East Asia, have been relied upon by nation-states as panaceas to the economic problems being experienced within older industrial regions. Central government has adopted a non-interventionist approach to FDI and has rather encouraged regional-level institutions of governance to provide innovative and competitive packages of aid to the prospective investors through the creation of customised spaces. By relying on this FDI, local and regional-level institutions within the UK have sought to reduce or eliminate those uncertainties associated with local governance and the planning system that would otherwise face potential investors. We discuss these issues with reference to three case-study FDI examples: LG in South Wales, Samsung in the North East of England and Hyundai in Scotland. These projects provide good examples of the prestige attached to large FDI projects by regional and local agencies: by-passing normal local democratic processes; instigating streamlined institutional processes; and ignoring environmental protection policies to `land' the projects for particular regions. But the collapse of the south-east Asian economies and the recent mothballing of both the Hyundai and LG plants illustrate some very immediate problems regarding the unsustainability of the nation-state both relying on the global market and subordinating local interstices to resolve regional economic problems. Overall, the paper examines how particular state forms and practices operate to privilege certain types of interests and activities at certain scales, and how particular state entities are attempting to capture agendas and decisions at particular scales of governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas A. Phelps & Mark Tewdwr-Jones, 2001. "Globalisation, Regions and the State: Exploring the Limitations of Economic Modernisation through Inward Investment," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(8), pages 1253-1272, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:38:y:2001:i:8:p:1253-1272
    DOI: 10.1080/00420980120061016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980120061016
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420980120061016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N A Phelps & M Tewdwr-Jones, 1998. "Institutional Capacity Building in a Strategic Policy Vacuum: The Case of the Korean Company LG in South Wales," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 16(6), pages 735-755, December.
    2. Nicholas A Phelps & Mark Tewdwr-Jones, 2000. "Scratching the Surface of Collaborative and Associative Governance: Identifying the Diversity of Social Action in Institutional Capacity Building," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(1), pages 111-130, January.
    3. N. A. Phelps & C. Fuller, 2000. "Multinationals, Intracorporate Competition, and Regional Development," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(3), pages 224-243, July.
    4. Chang, Ha-Joon, 1993. "The Political Economy of Industrial Policy in Korea," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 17(2), pages 131-157, June.
    5. Mark Tewdwr-Jones & Nicholas Phelps, 2000. "Levelling the Uneven Playing Field: Inward Investment, Interregional Rivalry and the Planning System," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 429-440.
    6. J Peck & A Tickell, 1995. "The Social Regulation of Uneven Development: ‘Regulatory Deficit’, England's South East, and the Collapse of Thatcherism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 27(1), pages 15-40, January.
    7. A Harding, 1991. "The Rise of Urban Growth Coalitions, UK-Style?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 9(3), pages 295-317, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Nicholas Gill, 2003. "The Global Trend towards Devolution and its Implications," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 21(3), pages 333-351, June.
    2. Aidan While & Andrew E G Jonas & David C Gibbs, 2004. "Unblocking the City? Growth Pressures, Collective Provision, and the Search for New Spaces of Governance in Greater Cambridge, England," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(2), pages 279-304, February.
    3. Peter Midmore & Dennis Thomas, 2006. "Regional Self-reliance and Economic Development: The Pembrokeshire Case," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 21(4), pages 391-408, November.
    4. Martijn J. Burger & Bert van der Knaap & Ronald S. Wall, 2013. "Revealed competition for greenfield investments between European regions," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 13(4), pages 619-648, July.
    5. Mike Hodson, 2008. "Old Industrial Regions, Technology, and Innovation: Tensions of Obduracy and Transformation," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(5), pages 1057-1075, May.
    6. Timothy Dixon & David Adams, 2008. "Housing Supply and Brownfield Regeneration in a post-Barker World: Is There Enough Brownfield Land in England and Scotland?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(1), pages 115-139, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joseph Leibovitz, 2003. "Institutional Barriers to Associative City-region Governance: The Politics of Institution-building and Economic Governance in 'Canada's Technology Triangle'," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(13), pages 2613-2642, December.
    2. Martijn J. Burger & Bert van der Knaap & Ronald S. Wall, 2013. "Revealed competition for greenfield investments between European regions," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 13(4), pages 619-648, July.
    3. Florian Becker-Ritterspach & Christoph Dörrenbächer, 2011. "An Organizational Politics Perspective on Intra-firm Competition in Multinational Corporations," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 533-559, August.
    4. Kim, Jinhee & Lee, Keun, 2022. "Local–global interface as a key factor in the catching up of regional innovation systems: Fast versus slow catching up among Taipei, Shenzhen, and Penang in Asia," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    5. Diogo Ferraz & Fernanda P. S. Falguera & Enzo B. Mariano & Dominik Hartmann, 2021. "Linking Economic Complexity, Diversification, and Industrial Policy with Sustainable Development: A Structured Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, January.
    6. Andrew M. Wood, 2004. "Domesticating Urban Theory? US Concepts, British Cities and the Limits of Cross-national Applications," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(11), pages 2103-2118, October.
    7. Paul Benneworth & Tiago Ratinho, 2014. "Reframing the Role of Knowledge Parks and Science Cities in Knowledge-Based Urban Development," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 32(5), pages 784-808, October.
    8. Diego Sánchez-Ancochea, 2005. "Capitalismo, desarrollo y Estado. Una revisión crítica de la teoría del Estado de Schumpeter," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 7(13), pages 81-100, July-Dece.
    9. Paul Lawless, 1994. "Partnership in Urban Regeneration in the UK: The Sheffield Central Area Study," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 31(8), pages 1303-1324, October.
    10. Mark Sandford, 2020. "Conceptualising ‘generative power’: Evidence from the city-regions of England," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(10), pages 2098-2114, August.
    11. Deepak Nayyar, 2006. "Development through Globalization?," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2006-29, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    12. Simona Iammarino, 2018. "FDI and regional development policy," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 1(3), pages 157-183, December.
    13. Ochieng, Cosmas Milton Obote, 2007. "Development through Positive Deviance and its Implications for Economic Policy Making and Public Administration in Africa: The Case of Kenyan Agricultural Development, 1930-2005," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 454-479, March.
    14. Karolien De Bruyne & Wouter Bam & Denis Engelbrecht, 2023. "South Africa's titanium industrial policy: A product space perspective," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 91(1), pages 3-27, March.
    15. Berglof, Erik & Cable , Vince, 2018. "Back in Business: Industrial Policy for Emerging Economies in the New Globalization," ADB Economics Working Paper Series 537, Asian Development Bank.
    16. Matthew McCartney, 2017. "Bangladesh 2000-2017: Sustainable Growth, Technology and the Irrelevance of Productivity," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 22(Special E), pages 183-198, September.
    17. Regina M. Abrami & Yu Zheng, 2010. "The New Face of Chinese Industrial Policy: Making Sense of Anti-Dumping Cases in the Petrochemical and Steel Industries," Harvard Business School Working Papers 11-042, Harvard Business School.
    18. Hassink Robert, 2002. "Südkoreas Regionalentwicklung im Spannungsfeld zwischen nationaler Wirtschaftsentwicklung, Regionalismus und Regionalpolitik," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 46(1), pages 213-227, October.
    19. Sébastien Lechevalier & Pauline Debanes & Shin Wonkyu, 2016. "Financialization and industrial policies in Japan and Korea: Evolving complementarities and loss of institutional capabilities," Working Papers halshs-01431783, HAL.
    20. Song, Teresa, 2024. "Why did gender inequality lag GDP per capita and human development growth in Korea over 1976-1996?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122006, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:38:y:2001:i:8:p:1253-1272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.