IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v35y1998i8p1261-1289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reasons for the Development of 'Islands of Innovation': Evidence from Hertfordshire

Author

Listed:
  • James Simmie

    (Planning and Development Research Centre, Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, Wates House, 22 Gordon Street, London, WC1H 0QB, England, UK, j.simmie@ucl.ac.uk)

Abstract

This paper analyses why innovations often cluster in a few metropolitan islands of innovation. The reason for this interest is that a growing body of neo-Schumpeterian economic theory argues that economic recovery after periods of economic recession and depression, such as we have seen during the 1980s and early 1990s, is driven by innovations. These do not spring up all over the country but are spatially concentrated in a small number of metropolitan regions. It is therefore important to know why this is so in order to evaluate the effectiveness of various UK and EU public policies whose specific objectives are to stimulate local and regional economic development. Agglomeration theory is used in order to understand the driving forces behind the spatial clustering of new innovations. This leads to four explanatory hypotheses. These are that innovation is facilitated by agglomeration in order to reduce distance transaction costs between firms in different spaces; or by local factor conditions which provide factor cost efficiencies within given localities; or by continuous production hierarchy negotiation within particular spaces; or by demand pull conditions that lead to agglomeration behaviour which maximises the coincidence between both production hierarchies and markets. These hypotheses were tested on a small sample of award-winning firms in the highly innovative county of Hertfordshire. It is one of the most innovative parts of the Western Arc around London which is UK's most innovative metropolitan region. The main findings are that, in this case study, innovations were concentrated in Hertfordshire for two main groups of reasons. The first was that the county is able to acquire important contributions to innovation production. These include high-quality human resources, venture and risk capital, knowledge and information, and new science and technology. These are not necessarily embedded in the area to start with but are comparatively available in the South East region as a whole. The second main group of findings is that innovation in Hertfordshire is facilitated by the ability to arrange simultaneously both production and consumption. Purchasers of military, health and welfare, and intermediate production goods have strong impacts on the design and development of innovations in Hertfordshire. Many of them are located in the core metropolitan regions of other advanced economies. Hertfordshire provides an innovative production node in global markets.

Suggested Citation

  • James Simmie, 1998. "Reasons for the Development of 'Islands of Innovation': Evidence from Hertfordshire," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(8), pages 1261-1289, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:35:y:1998:i:8:p:1261-1289
    DOI: 10.1080/0042098984358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0042098984358
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0042098984358?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip McCann, 1995. "Rethinking the Economics of Location and Agglomeration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 32(3), pages 563-577, April.
    2. Saxenian, AnnaLee, 1991. "The origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 423-437, October.
    3. Perez, Carlota, 1985. "Microelectronics, long waves and world structural change: New perspectives for developing countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 441-463, March.
    4. Allen J. Scott, 1982. "Locational Patterns and Dynamics of Industrial Activity in the Modern Metropolis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 19(2), pages 111-141, May.
    5. Chris Thompson, 1989. "High Technology and Public Policy," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 7(2), pages 119-119, June.
    6. Brusco, Sebastiano, 1982. "The Emilian Model: Productive Decentralisation and Social Integration," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 6(2), pages 167-184, June.
    7. Louise Crewe, 1996. "Material Culture: Embedded Firms, Organizational Networks and the Local Economic Development of a Fashion Quarter," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 257-272.
    8. Raymond Vernon, 1966. "International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 80(2), pages 190-207.
    9. Heidi Wiig Aslesen & Michelle Wood, "undated". "What comprises a regional innovation system? An empirical study," STEP Report series 199501, The STEP Group, Studies in technology, innovation and economic policy.
    10. François Perroux, 1950. "Economic Space: Theory and Applications," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 64(1), pages 89-104.
    11. Nijkamp, P., 1986. "New technology and regional development," Serie Research Memoranda 0001, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simona Iammarino & Philip McCann, 2010. "The Relationship between Multinational Firms and Innovative Clusters," Chapters, in: Ron Boschma & Ron Martin (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Capponi, Giovanna & Criscuolo, Paola & Martinelli, Arianna & Nuvolari, Alessandro, 2019. "Profiting from innovation: Evidence from a survey of Queen's Awards winners," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 155-169.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:rri:wpaper:200605 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Anders Malmberg & Peter Maskell, 2002. "The Elusive Concept of Localization Economies: Towards a Knowledge-Based Theory of Spatial Clustering," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(3), pages 429-449, March.
    3. Gachino, Geoffrey, 2007. "Technological spillovers from multinational presence - Towards a conceptual framework," MERIT Working Papers 2007-017, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    4. Gashawbeza Bekele & Randall Jackson, 2006. "Theoretical Perspectives on Industry Clusters," Working Papers Working Paper 2006-05, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.
    5. Sturgeon, Timothy J., 1997. "Does Manufacturing Still Matter? The Organizational Delinking of Production from Innovation," UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, Working Paper Series qt2g22d9d2, UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, UC Berkeley.
    6. Ian R. Gordon & Philip McCann, 2000. "Industrial Clusters: Complexes, Agglomeration and/or Social Networks?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(3), pages 513-532, March.
    7. Robert J. Stimson, 2014. "Proximity and endogenous regional development," Chapters, in: André Torre & Frédéric Wallet (ed.), Regional Development and Proximity Relations, chapter 1, pages 47-93, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. John N H Britton, 2003. "Network Structure of an Industrial Cluster: Electronics in Toronto," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 35(6), pages 983-1006, June.
    9. Kamann, D.J. & Nijkamp, P., 1988. "Technogenesis : incubation and diffusion," Serie Research Memoranda 0024, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    10. Niles Hansen, 1991. "Factories in Danish Fields: How High-Wage, Flexible Production has Succeeded in Peripheral Jutland," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 14(2), pages 109-132, August.
    11. Giulio Bottazzi & Giorgio Fagiolo & Giovanni Dosi, 2002. "Mapping Sectoral Patterns of Technological Accumulation into the Geography of Corporate Locations. A Simple Model and Some Promising Evidence," LEM Papers Series 2002/21, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    12. James Simmie & James Sennett & Peter Wood & Doug Hart, 2002. "Innovation in Europe: A Tale of Networks, Knowledge and Trade in Five Cities," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 47-64.
    13. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2012_017 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Robertson, Paul L. & Langlois, Richard N., 1995. "Innovation, networks, and vertical integration," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 543-562, July.
    15. Geoffrey G. Gachino, 2010. "Technological spillovers from multinational presence," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 10(3), pages 193-210, July.
    16. Vertova, Giovanna, 2002. "A historical investigation of the geography of innovative activities," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 259-283, September.
    17. Zander, Ivo, 2004. "The microfoundations of cluster stickiness--walking in the shoes of the entrepreneur," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 151-175.
    18. James Simmie, 2005. "Critical surveys edited by Stephen Roper innovation and space: A critical review of the literature," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(6), pages 789-804.
    19. Steinle, Claus & Schiele, Holger, 2002. "When do industries cluster?: A proposal on how to assess an industry's propensity to concentrate at a single region or nation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 849-858, August.
    20. David Keeble & Peter Tyler, 1995. "Enterprising Behaviour and the Urban-Rural Shift," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 32(6), pages 975-997, June.
    21. Juan J. Palacios, 2016. "Too many Labels, Just a Few Concepts: The Intrinsic Properties of Industrial Agglomeration Archetypes," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 433-460, December.
    22. Francis, Bill B. & Hasan, Iftekhar & John, Kose & Waisman, Maya, 2016. "Urban Agglomeration and CEO Compensation," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(6), pages 1925-1953, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:35:y:1998:i:8:p:1261-1289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.