IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v35y1998i10p1813-1833.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethnic Residential Patterns in Dutch Cities: Backgrounds, Shifts and Consequences

Author

Listed:
  • Ronald van Kempen

    (Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Utrecht University, PO Box 80.155, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands, R.vanKempen@geog.uu.nl)

  • Jan van Weesep

    (Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Utrecht University, PO Box 80.155, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands, J.vanWeesep@geog.uu.nl)

Abstract

This article describes recent trends in the residential patterns of ethnic minorities, specifically Turks and Moroccans, in Dutch cities. In order to evaluate the patterns and their dynamics, some general observations about segregation are included. The patterns in the big cities are compared to those observed elsewhere in the country and in other European cities. This brief comparison is followed by a discussion of how the observed spatial patterns affect the social life of the groups in question. The article concludes with a list of factors that are likely to influence the evolution of ethnic residential patterns in the Netherlands in the near future. There seem to be ever fewer reasons to believe that the trend towards increasing segregation in Dutch cities can be reversed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronald van Kempen & Jan van Weesep, 1998. "Ethnic Residential Patterns in Dutch Cities: Backgrounds, Shifts and Consequences," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(10), pages 1813-1833, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:35:y:1998:i:10:p:1813-1833
    DOI: 10.1080/0042098984169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0042098984169
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0042098984169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wendy Sarkissian, 1976. "The Idea of Social Mix in Town Planning: An Historical Review," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 13(3), pages 231-246, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ronald Van Kempen & Alan Murie, 2009. "The New Divided City: Changing Patterns In European Cities," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 100(4), pages 377-398, September.
    2. Helen Kruythoff, 2003. "DUTCH URBAN RESTRUCTURING POLICY IN ACTION AGAINST SOCIO-spATIAL SEGREGRATION: SENSE OR NONSENSE?," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 193-215.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco Andreoli & Eugenio Peluso, 2016. "So close yet so unequal: Reconsidering spatial inequality in U.S. cities," Working Papers 21/2016, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    2. Chih Hoong Sin, 2002. "The Quest for a Balanced Ethnic Mix: Singapore's Ethnic Quota Policy Examined," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(8), pages 1347-1374, July.
    3. Hazel Easthope & Laura Crommelin & Sophie-May Kerr & Laurence Troy & Ryan van den Nouwelant & Gethin Davison, 2022. "Planning for Lower-Income Households in Privately Developed High-Density Neighbourhoods in Sydney, Australia," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 213-228.
    4. Giada Casarin & Julie MacLeavy & David Manley, 2023. "Rethinking urban utopianism: The fallacy of social mix in the 15-minute city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(16), pages 3167-3186, December.
    5. ANDREOLI Francesco & PELUSO Eugenio, 2017. "So close yet so unequal: Spatial inequality in American cities," LISER Working Paper Series 2017-11, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    6. Rasmus H Birk, 2017. "Infrastructuring the social: Local community work, urban policy and marginalized residential areas in Denmark," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(4), pages 767-783, April.
    7. Eroglu, Sevgin & Michel, Géraldine, 2018. "The dark side of place attachment: Why do customers avoid their treasured stores?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 258-270.
    8. E. Anthon Eff, 2013. "Veblen in the Metropolis: Land Use Proximity in United States Urban Landscapes," Working Papers 201301, Middle Tennessee State University, Department of Economics and Finance.
    9. Jing Lin & Jianming Cai & Fei Han & Yan Han & Junping Liu, 2016. "Underperformance of Planning for Peri-Urban Rural Sustainable Development: The Case of Mentougou District in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-18, August.
    10. John R. Ottensmann, 1982. "Neighborhood Heterogeneity Within an Urban Area," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 19(4), pages 391-395, November.
    11. Veronique A. J. M. Schutjens & Ronald van Kempen & Jan van Weesep, 2002. "The Changing Tenant Profile of Dutch Social Rented Housing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(4), pages 643-664, April.
    12. Elspeth Graham & David Manley & Rosemary Hiscock & Paul Boyle & Joe Doherty, 2009. "Mixing Housing Tenures: Is it Good for Social Well-being?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(1), pages 139-165, January.
    13. Wouter van Gent & Cody Hochstenbach & Justus Uitermark, 2018. "Exclusion as urban policy: The Dutch ‘Act on Extraordinary Measures for Urban Problems’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(11), pages 2337-2353, August.
    14. Ronald van Kempen & A. şule Özüekren, 1998. "Ethnic Segregation in Cities: New Forms and Explanations in a Dynamic World," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(10), pages 1631-1656, October.
    15. Justus Uitermark, 2003. "'Social Mixing' and the Management of Disadvantaged Neighbourhoods: The Dutch Policy of Urban Restructuring Revisited," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(3), pages 531-549, March.
    16. Loretta Lees, 2008. "Gentrification and Social Mixing: Towards an Inclusive Urban Renaissance?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(12), pages 2449-2470, November.
    17. Howard F. Andrews, 1986. "The Effects of Neighbourhood Social Mix on Adolescents' Social Networks and Recreational Activities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 23(6), pages 501-517, December.
    18. Emily Talen, 2010. "The Context of Diversity: A Study of Six Chicago Neighbourhoods," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(3), pages 486-513, March.
    19. Lauren Hannscott, 2016. "Individual and contextual socioeconomic status and community satisfaction," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(8), pages 1727-1744, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:35:y:1998:i:10:p:1813-1833. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.