IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/treure/v27y2021i4p433-452.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making algorithms safe for workers: occupational risks associated with work managed by artificial intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • Adrián Todolí-Signes

    (16781 University of Valencia , Spain)

Abstract

It is increasingly common for companies to use artificial intelligence mechanisms to manage work. This study examines the health hazards caused by these new forms of technological management. Occupational risks can be reduced if they are taken into account when programming an algorithm. This study confirms the need for algorithms to be correctly programmed, taking account of these occupational risks. In the same way as supervisors have to be trained in risk prevention to be able to perform their work, the algorithm must be programmed to weigh up the occupational risks – and when such features do not exist, steps must be taken to prevent the algorithm being used to direct workers. The algorithm must assess all (known) factors posing a risk to workers’ health and safety. It therefore seems necessary to incorporate a mandatory risk assessment performed by specialists in the programming of algorithms so that all ascertained risks can be taken into account.

Suggested Citation

  • Adrián Todolí-Signes, 2021. "Making algorithms safe for workers: occupational risks associated with work managed by artificial intelligence," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 27(4), pages 433-452, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:27:y:2021:i:4:p:433-452
    DOI: 10.1177/10242589211035040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10242589211035040
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10242589211035040?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abi Adams, 2018. "Technology and the labour market: the assessment," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 34(3), pages 349-361.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oussama Chemlal & Wafaa Benomar, 2024. "The Technological Impact on Employment in Spain between 2023 and 2035," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-30, April.
    2. Hepburn, Cameron & Stern, Nicholas & Xie, Chunping & Zenghelis, Dimitri, 2023. "China's economic development in the new era: challenges and paths," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 124057, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Mauro Caselli & Andrea Fracasso & Silvio Traverso, 2021. "Globalization, robotization, and electoral outcomes: Evidence from spatial regressions for Italy," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(1), pages 86-111, January.
    4. Salem Gheit, 2022. "A Stochastic Frontier Analysis of the Human Capital Effects on the Manufacturing Industries’ Technical Efficiency in the United States," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 8(3), pages 215-238, July.
    5. S. Devi Priya, 2022. "Digital labor of school teachers and their well-being: content analysis of English-language dailies in India," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 49(2), pages 203-212, June.
    6. Michael MITSOPOULOS & Theodore PELAGIDIS, 2021. "Labor Taxation And Investment In Developed Countries. The Impact On Employment," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(2), pages 13-31, June.
    7. Cedano, Karla G. & Hernández-Granados, Araceli, 2021. "Defining strategies to improve success of technology transfer efforts: An integrated tool for risk assessment," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:27:y:2021:i:4:p:433-452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.