IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/treure/v11y2005i3p409-422.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The European social dialogue in the 1990s: institutional innovations and new paradigms

Author

Listed:
  • Janine Goetschy

    (CNRS — IDHE, University of Nanterre, and Institute for European Studies, Université Libre de Bruxelles)

Abstract

This article describes the major changes undergone by social dialogue in the 1990s. Two distinct periods are covered. The first, following in the wake of the Maastricht Social Agreement annexed to the Maastricht Treaty (1992), did not produce the expected new impetus and results. The novel institutional device of ‘collective bargaining in the shadow of the law’, though an advantage in some respects, was also a source of weakness for the social dialogue. The most striking feature of the second period, covering the later part of the 1990s, is the impressive diversification of institutional forms of social dialogue, a development that ought to multiply its chances of success, even if the new forms tend to be rather less ambitious. Four main new developments are described: • Diversification of the forums for discussion; • Increase in the number and type of topics covered; • Use of OMC tools in the context of the social dialogue; • Search for new ways of establishing connections between different forms and levels of social dialogue. Whether this proliferation of ‘entry points’, arenas and discussion topics will serve to strengthen the actors and improve the results of the European social dialogue remains an open question.

Suggested Citation

  • Janine Goetschy, 2005. "The European social dialogue in the 1990s: institutional innovations and new paradigms," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 11(3), pages 409-422, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:11:y:2005:i:3:p:409-422
    DOI: 10.1177/102425890501100315
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/102425890501100315
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/102425890501100315?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Janine Goetschy, 2005. "The open method of coordination and the Lisbon strategy: the difficult road from potential to results," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 11(1), pages 064-080, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stefan Clauwaert, 2011. "2011: 20 years of European interprofessional social dialogue: achievements and prospects," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 17(2), pages 169-179, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:11:y:2005:i:3:p:409-422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.