IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/soueco/v22y2021i1p110-131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Estimation of the Implementation Costs and Financing Options for Introducing a Universal Pension Scheme in Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Mustafizur Rahman
  • Towfiqul Islam Khan
  • Mostafa Amir Sabbih

Abstract

The number of people aged more than 60 in Bangladesh is projected to constitute 20% of total population by 2051. The demographic momentum makes it necessary to pursue policies that guarantee a secured life for the country’s senior citizens. Currently, more than 40% of old age population (more than 65 years) in Bangladesh do not receive any type of pension or social security benefits. In this backdrop, introduction of a universal pension scheme (UPS) is an idea that should merit serious consideration. The idea of a UPS is also aligned with several Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) targets. Based on the International Labour Organization multi-pillar pension model, the article deals with required financing under different scenarios of introducing UPS in Bangladesh. The study estimates that for introducing a non-contributory UPS in Bangladesh, it would require an additional average allocation equivalent to 0.1%–0.5% of gross domestic product per annum between now and 2040. The article also estimates financing needs considering two options for the contributory UPS. The article concludes that UPS in Bangladesh can be launched on a limited scale which then could be expanded in scope and coverage in a gradual and phased manner. The article also underscores that introduction of UPS will create opportunities to rationalize the existing safety net programmes that will release funds for underwriting the UPS. JEL: H53, H55, I31, I38

Suggested Citation

  • Mustafizur Rahman & Towfiqul Islam Khan & Mostafa Amir Sabbih, 2021. "An Estimation of the Implementation Costs and Financing Options for Introducing a Universal Pension Scheme in Bangladesh," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 22(1), pages 110-131, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:soueco:v:22:y:2021:i:1:p:110-131
    DOI: 10.1177/13915614211008102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13915614211008102
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/13915614211008102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Holzmann, Robert & Paul, Richard Hinz & Dorfman, Mark, 2008. "Pension systems and reform conceptual framework," Social Protection Discussion Papers and Notes 46175, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. María del Carmen Valls Martínez & José Manuel Santos-Jaén & Fahim-ul Amin & Pedro Antonio Martín-Cervantes, 2021. "Pensions, Ageing and Social Security Research: Literature Review and Global Trends," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(24), pages 1-25, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Susanti, Yuli, 2024. "Enhancing Employee Pension Fund Performance for Sustainable Economic Growth in Indonesia," Warwick-Monash Economics Student Papers 80, Warwick Monash Economics Student Papers.
    2. Tesliuc, Cornelia & Silverio Marques, Jose & Mookodi, Lillian & Braithwaite, Jeanine & Sharma, Siddarth & Ntseane, Dolly, 2013. "Botswana social protection," Social Protection Discussion Papers and Notes 89003, The World Bank.
    3. Olga Rajevska, 2015. "Sustainability of Pension Systems in the Baltic States," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 3(4), pages 139-153.
    4. Che-cheong Poon & Tai-Yuen Hon, 2015. "Household Savings in Hong Kong: A Statistical Analysis," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 353-368, September.
    5. Habibah TOLOS & Peijie WANG & Miao ZHANG & Rory SHAND, 2014. "Retirement systems and pension reform: A Malaysian perspective," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 153(3), pages 489-502, September.
    6. Lhaopadchan, Suntharee & Gerrans, Paul & Treepongkaruna, Sirimon, 2024. "Retirement savings behaviours and COVID-19: Evidence from Thailand," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    7. Peter Waring & Azad Bali & Chris Vas, 2020. "The fourth industrial revolution and labour market regulation in Singapore," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 31(3), pages 347-363, September.
    8. Marhanum Che Mohd Salleh & Mohammad Abdul Matin Chowdhury & Siti Salwani Razali & Nan Nurhidayu Megat Laksana, 2020. "Retirement Schemes, its Challenges and Ways of Reformation: A Cross-Border Study," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(9), pages 507-520, September.
    9. Teresa Ghilarducci & Karthik Manickam, 2023. "A Critical Survey of Pension Provision And Pension Reform," SCEPA working paper series. 2023-04, Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis (SCEPA), The New School.
    10. Gentian Qejvanaj, 2021. "International Organizations Lending Policy, are There Strings Attached? A Case Study From the Latest Wave of Reforms in the Albanian Social Security System," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Pension schemes; universality; financing; senior citizens; SDGs; Bangladesh;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H53 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs
    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions
    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:soueco:v:22:y:2021:i:1:p:110-131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ips.lk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.