IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v49y2020i2p498-525.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Group Comparisons With Logistic Regression Models

Author

Listed:
  • Jouni Kuha
  • Colin Mills

Abstract

It is widely believed that regression models for binary responses are problematic if we want to compare estimated coefficients from models for different groups or with different explanatory variables. This concern has two forms. The first arises if the binary model is treated as an estimate of a model for an unobserved continuous response and the second when models are compared between groups that have different distributions of other causes of the binary response. We argue that these concerns are usually misplaced. The first of them is only relevant if the unobserved continuous response is really the subject of substantive interest. If it is, the problem should be addressed through better measurement of this response. The second concern refers to a situation which is unavoidable but unproblematic, in that causal effects and descriptive associations are inherently group dependent and can be compared as long as they are correctly estimated.

Suggested Citation

  • Jouni Kuha & Colin Mills, 2020. "On Group Comparisons With Logistic Regression Models," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 49(2), pages 498-525, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:49:y:2020:i:2:p:498-525
    DOI: 10.1177/0049124117747306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124117747306
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0049124117747306?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766555.
    2. Sophia Rabe-Hesketh & Anders Skrondal, 2012. "Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata, 3rd Edition," Stata Press books, StataCorp LP, edition 3, number mimus2, March.
    3. Richard Breen & Anders Holm & Kristian Bernt Karlson, 2014. "Correlations and Nonlinear Probability Models," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 43(4), pages 571-605, November.
    4. Imbens,Guido W. & Rubin,Donald B., 2015. "Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521885881, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Florian, Sandra & Ichou, Mathieu & Panico, Lidia, 2021. "Parental migrant status and health inequalities at birth: The role of immigrant educational selectivity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    2. Karlson, Kristian Bernt & Ben Jann, 2023. "Marginal Odds Ratios: What They Are, How to Compute Them, and Why Sociologists Might Want to Use Them," University of Bern Social Sciences Working Papers 45, University of Bern, Department of Social Sciences.
    3. Asror Nigmonov & Syed Shams, 2021. "COVID-19 pandemic risk and probability of loan default: evidence from marketplace lending market," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-28, December.
    4. Reboul, E. & Guérin, I. & Nordman, C.J., 2021. "The gender of debt and credit: Insights from rural Tamil Nadu," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    5. Camille Dumeignil & Jean-Yves Lesueur & Mareva Sabatier, 2021. "Cross-border labour mobility decisions: The effect of complementarities in local labour markets," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 41(3), pages 1036-1049.
    6. Camille Dumeignil & Jean-Yves Lesueur & Mareva Sabatier, 2021. "Cross-border labour mobility decisions: The effect of complementarities in local labour markets," Post-Print halshs-03978234, HAL.
    7. Lunke, Erik B. & Fearnley, N. & Aarhaug, J., 2021. "Public transport competitiveness vs. the car: Impact of relative journey time and service attributes," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kuha, Jouni & Mills, Colin, 2018. "On group comparisons with logistic regression models," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 84163, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Kuha, Jouni & Mills, Colin, 2017. "On Group Comparisons with Logistic Regression Models," SocArXiv gwck3, Center for Open Science.
    3. Yusuke Narita, 2018. "Toward an Ethical Experiment," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2127, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    4. Yusuke Narita, 2018. "Experiment-as-Market: Incorporating Welfare into Randomized Controlled Trials," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2127r, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised May 2019.
    5. Gregory S. Crawford & Nicola Pavanini & Fabiano Schivardi, 2018. "Asymmetric Information and Imperfect Competition in Lending Markets," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(7), pages 1659-1701, July.
    6. Peter Haan & Arne Uhlendorff, 2006. "Estimation of multinomial logit models with unobserved heterogeneity using maximum simulated likelihood," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 6(2), pages 229-245, June.
    7. Markku Maula & Wouter Stam, 2020. "Enhancing Rigor in Quantitative Entrepreneurship Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(6), pages 1059-1090, November.
    8. Kasy, Maximilian, 2023. "The Political Economy of AI: Towards Democratic Control of the Means of Prediction," SocArXiv x7pcy, Center for Open Science.
    9. Kiran Tomlinson & Johan Ugander & Austin R. Benson, 2021. "Choice Set Confounding in Discrete Choice," Papers 2105.07959, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    10. Daniel Minh McCarthy & Elliot Shin Oblander, 2021. "Scalable Data Fusion with Selection Correction: An Application to Customer Base Analysis," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 459-480, May.
    11. Stefan Wager & Kuang Xu, 2021. "Experimenting in Equilibrium," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(11), pages 6694-6715, November.
    12. Peng, Marcus & Oleson, Kirsten L.L., 2017. "Beach Recreationalists' Willingness to Pay and Economic Implications of Coastal Water Quality Problems in Hawaii," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 41-52.
    13. Noriko Irie & Naoko Kawahara, 2023. "Social Impact Scoping Using Statistical Methods: The Case of a Novel Design of Abandoned Farmland Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    14. Stefan Wager & Kuang Xu, 2019. "Experimenting in Equilibrium," Papers 1903.02124, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2020.
    15. Konrad Menzel, 2021. "Structural Sieves," Papers 2112.01377, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.
    16. Andrés Elberg & Pedro M. Gardete & Rosario Macera & Carlos Noton, 2019. "Dynamic effects of price promotions: field evidence, consumer search, and supply-side implications," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-58, March.
    17. Rudolph, Christian, 2016. "How may incentives for electric cars affect purchase decisions?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 113-120.
    18. Stabridis, Omar & van Gameren, Edwin, 2018. "Exposure to firewood: Consequences for health and labor force participation in Mexico," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 382-395.
    19. Zhifeng Gao & Ted C. Schroeder, 2009. "Consumer responses to new food quality information: are some consumers more sensitive than others?," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 40(3), pages 339-346, May.
    20. Cheng, Leilei & Yin, Changbin & Chien, Hsiaoping, 2015. "Demand for milk quantity and safety in urban China: evidence from Beijing and Harbin," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 59(2), April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:49:y:2020:i:2:p:498-525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.