IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v48y2019i1p202-239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forms of Dependence: Comparing SAOMs and ERGMs From Basic Principles

Author

Listed:
  • Per Block
  • Christoph Stadtfeld
  • Tom A. B. Snijders

Abstract

Two approaches for the statistical analysis of social network generation are widely used; the tie-oriented exponential random graph model (ERGM) and the stochastic actor-oriented model (SAOM) or Siena model. While the choice for either model by empirical researchers often seems arbitrary, there are important differences between these models that current literature tends to miss. First, the ERGM is defined on the graph level, while the SAOM is defined on the transition level. This allows the SAOM to model asymmetric or one-sided tie transition dependence. Second, network statistics in the ERGM are defined globally but are nested in actors in the SAOM. Consequently, dependence assumptions in the SAOM are generally stronger than in the ERGM. Resulting from both, meso- and macro-level properties of networks that can be represented by either model differ substantively and analyzing the same network employing ERGMs and SAOMs can lead to distinct results. Guidelines for theoretically founded model choice are suggested.

Suggested Citation

  • Per Block & Christoph Stadtfeld & Tom A. B. Snijders, 2019. "Forms of Dependence: Comparing SAOMs and ERGMs From Basic Principles," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 48(1), pages 202-239, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:48:y:2019:i:1:p:202-239
    DOI: 10.1177/0049124116672680
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124116672680
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0049124116672680?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pavel N. Krivitsky & Mark S. Handcock, 2014. "A separable model for dynamic networks," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 76(1), pages 29-46, January.
    2. Tom Broekel & Pierre-Alexandre Balland & Martijn Burger & Frank Oort, 2014. "Modeling knowledge networks in economic geography: a discussion of four methods," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 53(2), pages 423-452, September.
    3. Stanley Wasserman & Philippa Pattison, 1996. "Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs andp," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(3), pages 401-425, September.
    4. Hunter, David R. & Goodreau, Steven M. & Handcock, Mark S., 2008. "Goodness of Fit of Social Network Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103, pages 248-258, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. De Nicola, Giacomo & Fritz, Cornelius & Mehrl, Marius & Kauermann, Göran, 2023. "Dependence matters: Statistical models to identify the drivers of tie formation in economic networks," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 351-363.
    2. Tom Broekel & Marcel Bednarz, 2018. "Disentangling link formation and dissolution in spatial networks: An Application of a Two-Mode STERGM to a Project-Based R&D Network in the German Biotechnology Industry," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 677-704, September.
    3. Anna Malinovskaya & Philipp Otto, 2021. "Online network monitoring," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(5), pages 1337-1364, December.
    4. Federica Bianchi & Francesco Bartolucci & Stefano Peluso & Antonietta Mira, 2020. "Longitudinal networks of dyadic relationships using latent trajectories: evidence from the European interbank market," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(4), pages 711-739, August.
    5. Lee, Jihui & Li, Gen & Wilson, James D., 2020. "Varying-coefficient models for dynamic networks," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    6. Teague R. Henry & Kathleen M. Gates & Mitchell J. Prinstein & Douglas Steinley, 2020. "Modeling Heterogeneous Peer Assortment Effects Using Finite Mixture Exponential Random Graph Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(1), pages 8-34, March.
    7. Kei, Yik Lun & Chen, Yanzhen & Madrid Padilla, Oscar Hernan, 2023. "A partially separable model for dynamic valued networks," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    8. Teague R. Henry & David Banks & Derek Owens-Oas & Christine Chai, 2019. "Modeling Community Structure and Topics in Dynamic Text Networks," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 36(2), pages 322-349, July.
    9. Sándor Juhász, 2021. "Spinoffs and tie formation in cluster knowledge networks," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1385-1404, April.
    10. Gaonkar, Shweta & Mele, Angelo, 2023. "A model of inter-organizational network formation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 82-104.
    11. Cornelius Fritz & Michael Lebacher & Göran Kauermann, 2020. "Tempus volat, hora fugit: A survey of tie‐oriented dynamic network models in discrete and continuous time," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 74(3), pages 275-299, August.
    12. Anna‐Maria Kindt & Matthias Geissler & Kilian Bühling, 2022. "Be my (little) partner?!—Universities' role in regional innovation systems when large firms are rare," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(5), pages 1274-1295, November.
    13. Chih-Sheng Hsieh & Michael D. Konig & Xiaodong Liu, 2022. "A Structural Model for the Coevolution of Networks and Behavior," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 104(2), pages 355-367, May.
    14. He, Xi-jun & Dong, Yan-bo & Wu, Yu-ying & Jiang, Guo-rui & Zheng, Yao, 2019. "Factors affecting evolution of the interprovincial technology patent trade networks in China based on exponential random graph models," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 514(C), pages 443-457.
    15. Manuel E. Sosa & Martin Gargiulo & Craig Rowles, 2015. "Can Informal Communication Networks Disrupt Coordination in New Product Development Projects?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 1059-1078, August.
    16. Guo, Yaoqi & Zheng, Ru & Zhang, Hongwei, 2023. "Tantalum trade structural dependencies are what we need: A perspective on the industrial chain," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    17. Alessandro Lomi & Dean Lusher & Philippa E. Pattison & Garry Robins, 2014. "The Focused Organization of Advice Relations: A Study in Boundary Crossing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 438-457, April.
    18. Brennecke, Julia & Sofka, Wolfgang & Wang, Peng & Rank, Olaf N., 2021. "How the organizational design of R&D units affects individual search intensity – A network study," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(5).
    19. Kabirigi, Michel & Abbasiharofteh, Milad & Sun, Zhanli & Hermans, Frans, 2022. "The importance of proximity dimensions in agricultural knowledge and innovation systems: The case of banana disease management in Rwanda," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    20. Carter, Nathan & Hadlock, Charles & Haughton, Dominique, 2008. "Generating random networks from a given distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(8), pages 3928-3938, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:48:y:2019:i:1:p:202-239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.