IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v36y2008i4p542-562.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing the Stability of an Acquiescence Style Factor Behind Two Interrelated Substantive Variables in a Panel Design

Author

Listed:
  • Jaak B. Billiet

    (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, Jaak.Billiet@soc.kuleuven.be)

  • Eldad Davidov

    (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium)

Abstract

This article addresses the question of to what extent one type of response style, called acquiescence (or agreeing response bias), is stable over time. A structural equation modeling approach is applied to measure the stability of one acquiescence factor behind two concepts among the same respondents for a 4-year period. The data used are representative population surveys in 1995 and 1999 from the Belgian Election Study in which balanced sets of items are used for measuring two interrelated constructs: perceived ethnic threat and distrust in politics. This study provides empirical support that acquiescence is stable and consistent for a 4-year period.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaak B. Billiet & Eldad Davidov, 2008. "Testing the Stability of an Acquiescence Style Factor Behind Two Interrelated Substantive Variables in a Panel Design," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 36(4), pages 542-562, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:36:y:2008:i:4:p:542-562
    DOI: 10.1177/0049124107313901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124107313901
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0049124107313901?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dorothy Watson, 1992. "Correcting for Acquiescent Response Bias in the Absence of a Balanced Scale," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 21(1), pages 52-88, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mingnan Liu & Frederick G. Conrad & Sunghee Lee, 2017. "Comparing acquiescent and extreme response styles in face-to-face and web surveys," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 941-958, March.
    2. Alice Barth & Andreas Schmitz, 2018. "Response quality and ideological dispositions: an integrative approach using geometric and classifying techniques," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 175-194, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Rosmalen, J.M. & van Herk, H. & Groenen, P.J.F., 2007. "Identifying Unknown Response Styles: A Latent-Class Bilinear Multinomial Logit Model," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2007-045-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    2. Maike Schulz, 2012. "Messartefakte bei der Erfassung der Gesundheit von Migranten in Deutschland: zur interkulturellen Äquivalenz des SF-12-Fragebogen im Sozio-oekonomischen Panel (SOEP)," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 447, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    3. Chau-kiu Cheung & Raymond Chan, 2010. "Social Capital as Exchange: Its Contribution to Morale," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 96(2), pages 205-227, April.
    4. B. Weijters & M. Geuens & N. Schillewaert, 2008. "The Stability of Individual Response Styles," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 08/547, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    5. Kristiina Janhunen, 2012. "A comparison of Likert-type rating and visually-aided rating in a simple moral judgment experiment," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1471-1477, August.
    6. Stephen Fox, 2018. "Irresponsible Research and Innovation? Applying Findings from Neuroscience to Analysis of Unsustainable Hype Cycles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Alain De Beuckelaer & Bert Weijters & Anouk Rutten, 2010. "Using ad hoc measures for response styles: a cautionary note," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 761-775, June.
    8. Watson, Dorothy, 2011. "Quality of Public Services: Irish Public Perceptions and Implications for Renewal," Papers EC6, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    9. Xijuan Zhang & Ramsha Noor & Victoria Savalei, 2016. "Examining the Effect of Reverse Worded Items on the Factor Structure of the Need for Cognition Scale," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, June.
    10. Jean-Charles Pillet & Claudio Vitari & Federico Pigni & Kevin Carillo, 2018. "Detecting Biased Items When Developing a Scale: A Quantitative Method," Post-Print halshs-01923612, HAL.
    11. Jean-Charles Pillet & Claudio Vitari & Federico Pigni & Kevin Carillo, 2018. "Detecting Biased Items When Developing a Scale: A Quantitative Method," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) halshs-01923612, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:36:y:2008:i:4:p:542-562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.