IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v17y1988i2p123-157.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

True Score or Factor Models

Author

Listed:
  • WILLEM E. SARIS

    (University of Amsterdam)

  • BAS VAN DEN PUTTE

    (University of Amsterdam)

Abstract

In the February 1987 issue of Sociological Methods and Research several articles were published that dealt with the same data set. These data focused on attitudes toward guest workers. The purpose of that study was to demonstrate the application of measurement models, especially with respect to random measurement error, on large-scale survey data. Since we think that such studies are very valuable, we want to continue the discussion on measurement models by applying alternative models to the same data. We show that quite different models fit the same data set and that these models lead to quite different interpretations. In doing so we will use some tests that we think should be applied in order to differentiate between measurement or true score models and factor analysis models. In this article we show that the resulting models and interpretations of the data can vary quite a lot depending on whether one uses a true score model or a factor model. The substantive result of these analyses is that it seems possible to distinguish two types of opinions. One type we have called the first reaction, and the other type is called a more seriously considered opinion. These two opinions differ systematically from each other and therefore the results of research using the one or the other opinion will also differ.

Suggested Citation

  • Willem E. Saris & Bas Van Den Putte, 1988. "True Score or Factor Models," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 17(2), pages 123-157, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:17:y:1988:i:2:p:123-157
    DOI: 10.1177/0049124188017002001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124188017002001
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0049124188017002001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Albert Satorra & Willem Saris, 1985. "Power of the likelihood ratio test in covariance structure analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(1), pages 83-90, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ke-Hai Yuan & Wai Chan, 2005. "On Nonequivalence of Several Procedures of Structural Equation Modeling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 791-798, December.
    2. Ke-Hai Yuan & Peter Bentler, 2006. "Mean Comparison: Manifest Variable Versus Latent Variable," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(1), pages 139-159, March.
    3. Albert Satorra, 1989. "Alternative test criteria in covariance structure analysis: A unified approach," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 54(1), pages 131-151, March.
    4. Kenneth A. Bollen & James B. Kirby & Patrick J. Curran & Pamela M. Paxton & Feinian Chen, 2007. "Latent Variable Models Under Misspecification: Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) Estimators," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 36(1), pages 48-86, August.
    5. Dalia Khalil & Zinah George & Thomas Templin & Elizabeth Jenuwine & Arash Javanbakht, 2023. "Perceived adversity and psychological distress in refugee married couples resettling in the United States," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 69(5), pages 1268-1276, August.
    6. McQuitty, Shaun, 2004. "Statistical power and structural equation models in business research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 175-183, February.
    7. Feinian Chen & Kenneth A. Bollen & Pamela Paxton & Patrick J. Curran & James B. Kirby, 2001. "Improper Solutions in Structural Equation Models," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 29(4), pages 468-508, May.
    8. P. M. Bentler & Chih-Ping Chou, 1990. "Model Search With TETRAD II and EQS," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 19(1), pages 67-79, August.
    9. Dylan Molenaar, 2015. "Heteroscedastic Latent Trait Models for Dichotomous Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(3), pages 625-644, September.
    10. Cameron McIntosh, 2001. "Report on the Construct Validity of the Temporal Satisfaction With Life Scale," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 37-56, April.
    11. Clemens Draxler, 2010. "Sample Size Determination for Rasch Model Tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(4), pages 708-724, December.
    12. Nicolaou, Andreas I. & Masoner, Michael M., 2013. "Sample size requirements in structural equation models under standard conditions," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 256-274.
    13. Minjeong Jeon & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, 2016. "An autoregressive growth model for longitudinal item analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(3), pages 830-850, September.
    14. Albert Satorra, 2015. "A Comment on a Paper by H. Wu and M. W. Browne (2014)," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(3), pages 613-618, September.
    15. Patrick J. Curran & Kenneth A. Bollen & Feinian Chen & Pamela Paxton & James B. Kirby, 2003. "Finite Sampling Properties of the Point Estimates and Confidence Intervals of the RMSEA," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 32(2), pages 208-252, November.
    16. Bengt Muthén, 1989. "Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 54(4), pages 557-585, September.
    17. Julia Grass & Florian Krieger & Philipp Paulus & Samuel Greiff & Anja Strobel & Alexander Strobel, 2019. "Thinking in action: Need for Cognition predicts Self-Control together with Action Orientation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, August.
    18. Alberto Maydeu-Olivares & Rosa Montaño, 2013. "How Should We Assess the Fit of Rasch-Type Models? Approximating the Power of Goodness-of-Fit Statistics in Categorical Data Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 116-133, January.
    19. Wolfgang Jagodzinski & Steffen M. Kãœhnel & Peter Schmidt, 1987. "Is there a “Socratic Effect†in Nonexperimental Panel Studies?," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 15(3), pages 259-302, February.
    20. Paloma Bernal-Turnes & Ricardo Ernst, 2024. "More Bang for Your Buck: Best-Practice Recommendations for Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating Job Creation Studies," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 1889-1912, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:17:y:1988:i:2:p:123-157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.