IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v16y1987i2p309-334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interviewing Style and Respondent Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • WIL DIJKSTRA

    (Free University—Amsterdam)

Abstract

Guided by the model of the question-answer process as developed by Cannell and his coworkers, our main research question focused on how interviewers should behave in order to obtain adequate responses in survey interviews. A field experiment was conducted in which the interviewers adopted one of two behavioral styles, namely, a personal versus a formal style of interviewing. The dependent variables concerned measures of accuracy, social desirability, and the degree of relevant as well as irrelevant information. In addition, by experimentally manipulating the interviewer's alleged opinion, it was possible to ascertain conformity effects. Two different hypotheses were proposed to account for the effect of interviewing style on the dependent variables. The motivation hypothesis proposed that a personal style, compared with a formal style, would motivate the respondent to do well on the task and to give responses that would be as accurate and as adequate as possible. According to the ingratiation hypothesis, respondents interviewed in a personal style would be more inclined to attempt to ingratiate themselves with the interviewer, leading to more socially desirable responses, conformity, and irrelevant information. The results supported the motivation hypothesis. We contend that both motivation and ingratiation are important mechanisms in the question-answer process. However, it may be easier to influence the respondent's motivational level by means of the style of interviewing or other interviewing techniques than the respondent's ingratiation tendencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Wil Dijkstra, 1987. "Interviewing Style and Respondent Behavior," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 16(2), pages 309-334, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:16:y:1987:i:2:p:309-334
    DOI: 10.1177/0049124187016002006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124187016002006
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0049124187016002006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wil Dijkstra, 1983. "How interviewer variance can bias the results of research on interviewer effects," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 179-187, June.
    2. Wahlke, John C., 1979. "Pre-Behavioralism in Political Science," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 73(1), pages 9-31, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. J. Hox, 1994. "Hierarchical Regression Models for Interviewer and Respondent Effects," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 22(3), pages 300-318, February.
    2. Fahmi Fidan Mahmut & Öztaş Ayhan H. & Batmaz İnci, 2021. "Interviewer allocation through interview–reinterview nested design for response error estimation in sample surveys," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 22(2), pages 67-93, June.
    3. Theo Van Tilburg, 1998. "Interviewer Effects in the Measurement of Personal Network Size," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 26(3), pages 300-328, February.
    4. Merijn Eikelenboom & Melany Horsfall & Stasja Draisma & Jan H Smit, 2023. "Investigating people’s lifetime history of suicide attempts: a roadmap for studying interviewer-related error," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3183-3197, August.
    5. Finn-Aage Esbensen & Scott Menard, 1991. "Interviewer-related measurement error in attitudinal research: a nonexperimental study," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 151-165, May.
    6. Robert M. Groves & Nancy H. Fultz, 1985. "Gender Effects among Telephone Interviewers in a Survey of Economic Attitudes," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 14(1), pages 31-52, August.
    7. Isabella Buber-Ennser & Judith Kohlenberger & Bernhard Rengs & Zakarya Al Zalak & Anne Goujon & Erich Striessnig & Michaela Potančoková & Richard Gisser & Maria Rita Testa & Wolfgang Lutz, 2016. "Human Capital, Values, and Attitudes of Persons Seeking Refuge in Austria in 2015," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-29, September.
    8. John R. Hibbing & Kevin B. Smith, 2007. "The Biology of Political Behavior: An Introduction," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 614(1), pages 6-14, November.
    9. Fidan Mahmut Fahmi & H. Öztaş Ayhan & Ìnci Batmaz, 2021. "Interviewer allocation through interview–reinterview nested design for response error estimation in sample surveys," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 22(2), pages 67-93, June.
    10. Allyson L. Holbrook & Isabel C. Farrar & Susan J. Popkin, 2006. "Surveying a Chicago Public Housing Development," Evaluation Review, , vol. 30(6), pages 779-802, December.
    11. Sigrid Haunberger, 2010. "The effects of interviewer, respondent and area characteristics on cooperation in panel surveys: a multilevel approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 957-969, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:16:y:1987:i:2:p:309-334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.