IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v11y1982i1p101-111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Takahasi-Sakasegawa Randomized Response Technique

Author

Listed:
  • SANDRA F. BELDT

    (Georgia State University)

  • WAYNE W. DANIEL

    (Georgia State University)

  • BIKRAMJIT S. GARCHA

    (Georgia State University)

Abstract

The survey researcher who attempts to collect injormation on sensitive topics usually encounters resistance on the part of potential respondents. Subjects frequently either refuse to answer sensitive questions or give untruthful answers. The randomized response technique has been developed to facilitate the collection of sensitive information. Takahasi and Sakasegawa (1977) developed a variant of the randomized response technique that they claim to be suitable for selfadministered telephone interviews and mail surveys. A field test of the Takahasi-Sakasegawa technique cast doubt on its usefulness with self-administered and mail surveys with certain American respondents.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra F. Beldt & Wayne W. Daniel & Bikramjit S. Garcha, 1982. "The Takahasi-Sakasegawa Randomized Response Technique," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 11(1), pages 101-111, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:11:y:1982:i:1:p:101-111
    DOI: 10.1177/0049124182011001006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124182011001006
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0049124182011001006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koiti Takahasi & Hirotaka Sakasegawa, 1977. "A randomized response technique without making use of any randomizing device," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 29(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Hair, Joseph Jr. & Bush, Ronald F. & Busch, Paul, 1976. "Employee theft: Views from two sides," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 25-29, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John, Leslie K. & Loewenstein, George & Acquisti, Alessandro & Vosgerau, Joachim, 2018. "When and why randomized response techniques (fail to) elicit the truth," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 101-123.
    2. Blume, Andreas & Lai, Ernest K. & Lim, Wooyoung, 2019. "Eliciting private information with noise: The case of randomized response," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 356-380.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo-Liang Tian, 2014. "A new non-randomized response model: The parallel model," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 68(4), pages 293-323, November.
    2. Liu, Yin & Tian, Guo-Liang, 2013. "A variant of the parallel model for sample surveys with sensitive characteristics," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 115-135.
    3. Saigo, Hiroshi, 2021. "The independence assumption in the mixed randomized response model," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:11:y:1982:i:1:p:101-111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.