IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v4y2000i4p152-170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Women in Low Status Part-Time Jobs: A Class and Gender Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Tracey Warren

Abstract

Why, given all the problems associated with part-time employment in Britain, do women work part-time at all? Does the answer to this question lie in gender-based explanations which focus on womenís caring responsibilities? This paper addresses these issues by focusing on the relative experiences of the largest group of part-timers, women working in low status occupations. It is concluded that a gender-informed analysis of womenís part-time employment is clearly vital, but an awareness of further dimensions of social inequality is required if we are to understand diversity amongst part-timers. Relative to full-timers, part-timers are similar in their life-cycle positions, their marital status and motherhood status. However, incorporating a class analysis shows that part-timers in lower status jobs stand apart in that they are disproportionately likely to have been brought up in working class households and, as adults, they are more likely to be living in very low waged households with partners who are also in low paid manual occupations. It is concluded that women go into the lowest status part-time jobs in specific social contexts and, as a result, we cannot lump together into one unified group, women working part-time in manual and higher status occupations, and then talk sensibly about part-time work and its impact on women. It is essential to examine the interaction of gender and class inequalities to better understand these womenís working lives.

Suggested Citation

  • Tracey Warren, 2000. "Women in Low Status Part-Time Jobs: A Class and Gender Analysis," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 4(4), pages 152-170, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:4:y:2000:i:4:p:152-170
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.328
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.328?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kalwant Bhopal, 1998. "How Gender and Ethnicity Intersect: The Significance of Education, Employment and Marital Status," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 3(3), pages 29-39, September.
    2. Karen O'Reilly & David Rose, 1998. "Changing Employment Relations: Plus ça Change, Plus C'est La Meme Chose? Reflections Arising from the ESRC Review of Government Social Classifications," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 12(4), pages 713-733, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tracey Warren & Karen Rowlingson & Claire Whyley, 2001. "Female finances: Gender Wage Gaps and Gender Assets Gaps," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 15(3), pages 465-488, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sami Miaari & Nabil Khattab & Ron Johnston, 2019. "Religion and ethnicity at work: a study of British Muslim women’s labour market performance," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 19-47, January.
    2. Kenneth Prandy, 1998. "Deconstructing Classes: Critical Comments on the Revised Social Classification," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 12(4), pages 743-753, December.
    3. Najia Syed & Cathy Banwell & Tehzeeb Zulfiqar, 2020. "Highly Skilled South Asian Migrant Women in Australia: Hidden Economic Assets," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(12), pages 130-130, November.
    4. F. L. Jones & Julie McMillan, 2001. "Scoring Occupational Categories for Social Research: A Review of Current Practice, with Australian Examples," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 15(3), pages 539-563, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:4:y:2000:i:4:p:152-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.