IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v3y1998i3p16-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Choosing Qualitative Data Analysis Software: Atlas/ti and Nudist Compared

Author

Listed:
  • Christine A. Barry

Abstract

Choosing between Nudist and Atlas/ti, the main qualitative data analysis software packages can be difficult. To assist researchers in making this choice, I have conceptualised their differences along two dimensions, related to the qualities of the software and of the research project. The software dimension is structural design, and the project dimension is complexity. Software structure is dichotomised between structured, sequential, verbal versus visual, spatial, interconnected modes of operation. Projects are dichotomised between homogeneous sample, short timeframe, single data-type, single data analyst; versus multiple samples, longitudinal data, multiple data types and team data analysis. First I review the CAQDAS literature. Then I outline the different personalities and strengths of Atlas/ti and Nudist, and show how they match these dimensions. I offer suggestions as to how to choose, and whether to use in tandem with complementary conceptual network software.

Suggested Citation

  • Christine A. Barry, 1998. "Choosing Qualitative Data Analysis Software: Atlas/ti and Nudist Compared," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 3(3), pages 16-28, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:3:y:1998:i:3:p:16-28
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.178
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.178?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. K. Buston, 1997. "NUD*IST in Action: Its use and its Usefulness in a Study of Chronic Illness in Young People," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 2(3), pages 39-51, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dentoni, Domenico & Peterson, H. Christopher, 2011. "Multi-Stakeholder Sustainability Alliances in Agri-Food Chains: A Framework for Multi-Disciplinary Research," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 14(5), pages 1-25, December.
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2506 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Mauricio Marrone & Sascha Lemke & Lutz M. Kolbe, 2022. "Entity linking systems for literature reviews," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(7), pages 3857-3878, July.
    4. Sandip Mukhopadhyay & Jason Whalley, 2022. "The emergence and evolution of a disruptive platform ecosystem: evidence from the Indian mobile services industry," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 669-686, June.
    5. Katie MacMillan & Shelley McLachlan, 1999. "Theory-Building with Nud.Ist: Using Computer Assisted Qualitative Analysis in a Media Case Study," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 4(2), pages 1-14, July.
    6. Sandip Mukhopadhyay & Rajen K. Gupta, 2014. "Survey of Qualitative Research Methodology in Strategy Research and Implication for Indian Researchers," Vision, , vol. 18(2), pages 109-123, June.
    7. Lionel Garreau & Rodrigo Bandeira-De-Mello, 2008. "Possibilités et pièges liés à l'utilisation des logiciels dans le processus d'analyse au travers de la théorie enracinée," Post-Print halshs-00339851, HAL.
    8. Neringa Kalpokas & Ivana Radivojevic, 2022. "Bridging the Gap Between Methodology and Qualitative Data Analysis Software: A Practical Guide for Educators and Qualitative Researchers," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 27(2), pages 313-341, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Williamson & Gary Lynch-Wood & John Ramsay, 2006. "Drivers of Environmental Behaviour in Manufacturing SMEs and the Implications for CSR," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 67(3), pages 317-330, September.
    2. Peter Chen & S.M. Hinton, 1999. "Realtime Interviewing Using the World Wide Web," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 4(3), pages 63-81, September.
    3. Will Gibson & Peter Callery & Malcolm Campbell & Andy Hall & Dave Richards, 2005. "The Digital Revolution in Qualitative Research: Working with Digital Audio Data through Atlas. Ti," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 10(1), pages 57-68, June.
    4. Katie MacMillan & Shelley McLachlan, 1999. "Theory-Building with Nud.Ist: Using Computer Assisted Qualitative Analysis in a Media Case Study," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 4(2), pages 1-14, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:3:y:1998:i:3:p:16-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.